[Chicago-talk] Moose Role naming conventions
sean at blanton.com
Mon Apr 12 12:38:33 PDT 2010
Since Moose Roles go into the same package format as regular classes, how
are people organizing them so they can be distinguished from classes that
A) Through namespace, as in:
B) through the package names (I think I'm going to go with this one):
C) or you don’t care at all about the fact that a .pm file might be a Moose
I’d like to hear what others consider when making a decision.
Does a Moose role even have to be a package?
Sean Blanton, Ph.D.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Chicago-talk