From tigerpeng2001 at yahoo.com Mon Oct 1 06:59:52 2007 From: tigerpeng2001 at yahoo.com (tiger peng) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 06:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Chicago-talk] Off Topic: Laptop Recommendation Message-ID: <211042.85535.qm@web58707.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Acer's keyboard is good, but its touch pad is really bad, I have to touch a mickey to it. Thinkpad's touch point is great. ----- Original Message ---- From: Jim Jacobus To: chicago-talk at pm.org Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 6:11:43 PM Subject: [Chicago-talk] Off Topic: Laptop Recommendation I know this is off topic, so please don't beat me up. I've been looking for a replacement for my much loved Micron GX3 laptop which I've used daily since June 2002! I'm frustrated with the way laptops are classified by manufacturers (what if I want an "all-purpose, power, ultraportable, desktop replacement"?) The search is getting pretty time-consuming. I figured since you're all s/w developers like me, I could ask what machines you prefer. One of my most important criteria is the keyboard. When you spend hours pounding out code you need a good keyboard with sculpted keys, nice tactile response, properly spaced and somewhat long travel to the keyclick. I've tried those flat keys on Macs and Sony and have thus ruled those machines out--just can't touch type accurately for any length of time. Dell's seem a little cramped to me. HP's keyboard seems to be good. Not sure about Gateways or Toshibas. I've never had the opportunity to even see an Asus. Another concern I have is with those 'glassy' screens. Don't you get a lot of glare off them especially under office florescent lights? For what it's worth my other criteria are: XP-pro; 15.4 (or so) inch screen with resolution of at least 1400 x 1050; Intel Core 2 Duo; 1-2 GB memory; 60+GB drive; ATI or nVidia dedicated graphics card. I'm finding it really difficult to narrow my search down using the selection criteria at websites like notebookreview.com So, if you care to respond, could you comment on what machines you use (or prefer)? A couple grand or more is a big purchase, so I'm casting wide net for opinions. Thanks in advance. _______________________________________________ Chicago-talk mailing list Chicago-talk at pm.org http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071001/6a9b7a95/attachment.html From lembark at wrkhors.com Mon Oct 1 13:14:26 2007 From: lembark at wrkhors.com (Steven Lembark) Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 16:14:26 -0400 Subject: [Chicago-talk] advanced perl training in chicagoland In-Reply-To: <841e880a0709280713r7e4b5c5auaf30390e8c4e04f2@mail.gmail.com> References: <841e880a0709280713r7e4b5c5auaf30390e8c4e04f2@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <47015522.4070101@wrkhors.com> > Does anyone have suggestions for Perl training around the chicagoland > area? Something more advanced than an intro, but not specializing on a > topic like web frameworks. Check Stonehenge. They have open classes (or you can get enough people together to have one). -- Steven Lembark 85-09 90th Street Workhorse Computing Woodhaven, NY 11421 lembark at wrkhors.com +1 888 359 3508 From brian.d.foy at gmail.com Mon Oct 1 13:27:48 2007 From: brian.d.foy at gmail.com (brian d foy) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:27:48 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] advanced perl training in chicagoland In-Reply-To: <841e880a0709280713r7e4b5c5auaf30390e8c4e04f2@mail.gmail.com> References: <841e880a0709280713r7e4b5c5auaf30390e8c4e04f2@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <2715accf0710011327j3488ceefxca04b7140432d3f1@mail.gmail.com> On 9/28/07, Warren Lindsey wrote: > Does anyone have suggestions for Perl training around the chicagoland > area? Something more advanced than an intro, but not specializing on a > topic like web frameworks. Hi Warren, Is there someway that Stonehenge can help? Feel free to call me at 503 766 2264 to talk about it. Thanks, -- brian d foy http://www.pair.com/~comdog/ From lembark at wrkhors.com Tue Oct 2 12:25:20 2007 From: lembark at wrkhors.com (Steven Lembark) Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Off Topic: Laptop Recommendation In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20070930174311.03192e00@SurplusRecord.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20070930174311.03192e00@SurplusRecord.com> Message-ID: <47029B20.5070902@wrkhors.com> I picked up a unit from "generation-X" computers. They are helpful in selling decent systems without an O/S if you don't want it (i.e., avoiding the microsoft tax). Basically, they go to the same chinese factories that produce Sony, Toshiba, etc, machines and buy them without logos. I picked up a 17" box with st'a rosa cpu, 2GB core, 120GB drive, spare battery, and shipping for < $3000. The high-res (1900x1200) display is useful for graphics processing, you might not need that high-end of a display. They got me the machine quickly and it worked the first time. Their web site is: http://www.gen-x-pc.com/ My machine is: http://www.gen-x-pc.com/note_9260.htm enjoi -- Steven Lembark 85-09 90th Street Workhorse Computing Woodhaven, NY 11421 lembark at wrkhors.com +1 888 359 3508 From JJacobus at PonyX.com Tue Oct 2 14:17:48 2007 From: JJacobus at PonyX.com (Jim Jacobus) Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Off Topic: Laptop Recommendation In-Reply-To: <47029B20.5070902@wrkhors.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20070930174311.03192e00@SurplusRecord.com> <47029B20.5070902@wrkhors.com> Message-ID: <6.2.5.6.2.20071002161348.03903870@PonyX.com> Wow. Didn't know about this company before. Gives you a lot of options. What o/s did you load? At 02:25 PM 10/2/2007, you wrote: >I picked up a unit from "generation-X" computers. >They are helpful in selling decent systems without >an O/S if you don't want it (i.e., avoiding the >microsoft tax). Basically, they go to the same >chinese factories that produce Sony, Toshiba, >etc, machines and buy them without logos. > >I picked up a 17" box with st'a rosa cpu, 2GB core, >120GB drive, spare battery, and shipping for < $3000. >The high-res (1900x1200) display is useful for >graphics processing, you might not need that high-end >of a display. > >They got me the machine quickly and it worked the >first time. > >Their web site is: > > http://www.gen-x-pc.com/ > >My machine is: > > http://www.gen-x-pc.com/note_9260.htm > >enjoi > >-- >Steven Lembark 85-09 90th Street >Workhorse Computing Woodhaven, NY 11421 >lembark at wrkhors.com +1 888 359 3508 >_______________________________________________ >Chicago-talk mailing list >Chicago-talk at pm.org >http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk From warren.lindsey at gmail.com Wed Oct 3 05:30:08 2007 From: warren.lindsey at gmail.com (Warren Lindsey) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 07:30:08 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] advanced perl training in chicagoland In-Reply-To: <2715accf0710011327j3488ceefxca04b7140432d3f1@mail.gmail.com> References: <841e880a0709280713r7e4b5c5auaf30390e8c4e04f2@mail.gmail.com> <2715accf0710011327j3488ceefxca04b7140432d3f1@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <841e880a0710030530u1ca4f051q4e5c38ce9786c892@mail.gmail.com> Thanks Brian, Of course, Stonehenge was my first suggestion. I have a training requirment to meet at work by end of year. I was actually planning on attending some veritas cluster training but it's been turned down because of a travel freeze. Is there a class schedule for the intermediate class here in chicago? How often do you do classes? Thanks, Warren On 10/1/07, brian d foy wrote: > On 9/28/07, Warren Lindsey wrote: > > Does anyone have suggestions for Perl training around the chicagoland > > area? Something more advanced than an intro, but not specializing on a > > topic like web frameworks. > > Hi Warren, > > Is there someway that Stonehenge can help? Feel free to call me at 503 > 766 2264 to talk about it. > > Thanks, > > -- > brian d foy > http://www.pair.com/~comdog/ > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > From robert at robertblackwell.com Wed Oct 3 14:18:09 2007 From: robert at robertblackwell.com (Robert Blackwell) Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The Pittsburgh Perl Workshop 2007 is October 13-14, 2007. Message-ID: (Please feel free to forward...) The 2007 Pittsburgh Perl Workshop is only 10 days away. The Pittsburgh Perl Mongers are pleased to announce The PITTSBURGH PERL WORKSHOP, a two-day, low-cost conference on Saturday and Sunday, October 13-14, 2007. The Pittsburgh Perl Workshop is an annual conference dedicated to the Perl programming language. In 2006, the Pittsburgh Perl Mongers hosted the first Perl Workshop based in the United States. This year, the Workshop has been expanded to two days. The 2007 Workshop is structured as a series of short lectures, but the atmosphere is low key and engaging: the perfect combination to open your mind and then cram it full of good stuff. After last year's conference you gave us lots of feedback, and we listened. * The workshop was expanded to a two-day event to allow for more talks, birds-of-a-feather sessions, and social interactions. * A one-day course for programmers with little or no Perl experience?- taught by a world-class Perl trainer?-was added. * The schedule has been improved to allow you more flexibility in choosing sessions to attend. Lightning Talks There?s still time to get a third of your fifteen minutes of fame! Submit your lightning talk today. The deadline for early acceptance is one week before the conference (October 6). But if you have an idea on the first day of the conference, we?re holding at least two lightning talk spots until the end of that day. However, you have a much better chance of being accepted if submit your talk now. Stay up to date with everything that's going on with the Perl Workshop by subscribing to our RSS feed at http://pghpw.org/ppw2007/ atom/en.xml. If you are coming to the Friday Social, RSVP at http://pghpw.org/ ppw2007/wiki?node=Friday%20Social. Full details are on the Workshop Web site at http://pghpw.org. Hope to see you there. Robert Blackwell From lembark at wrkhors.com Thu Oct 4 09:10:17 2007 From: lembark at wrkhors.com (Steven Lembark) Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Off Topic: Laptop Recommendation In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20071002161348.03903870@PonyX.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20070930174311.03192e00@SurplusRecord.com> <47029B20.5070902@wrkhors.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20071002161348.03903870@PonyX.com> Message-ID: <47051069.8090204@wrkhors.com> > Wow. Didn't know about this company before. Gives you a lot of > options. What o/s did you load? Gentoo 2007.0 base w/ gentoo-sources kernel. I'm playing around with the "suspend" kernel but the time required for a cold restart is low enough (about 30 seconds round trip) that it isn't all that necessary. enjoi -- Steven Lembark 85-09 90th Street Workhorse Computing Woodhaven, NY 11421 lembark at wrkhors.com +1 888 359 3508 From lembark at wrkhors.com Thu Oct 4 09:11:17 2007 From: lembark at wrkhors.com (Steven Lembark) Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Chicago-talk] advanced perl training in chicagoland In-Reply-To: <841e880a0710030530u1ca4f051q4e5c38ce9786c892@mail.gmail.com> References: <841e880a0709280713r7e4b5c5auaf30390e8c4e04f2@mail.gmail.com> <2715accf0710011327j3488ceefxca04b7140432d3f1@mail.gmail.com> <841e880a0710030530u1ca4f051q4e5c38ce9786c892@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <470510A5.1070508@wrkhors.com> > Of course, Stonehenge was my first suggestion. I have a training > requirment to meet at work by end of year. I was actually planning on > attending some veritas cluster training but it's been turned down > because of a travel freeze. Might also want to see about the upcoming weekend in Pittsburg. They might have something that would work for you. -- Steven Lembark 85-09 90th Street Workhorse Computing Woodhaven, NY 11421 lembark at wrkhors.com +1 888 359 3508 From joshua.mcadams at gmail.com Thu Oct 4 11:35:08 2007 From: joshua.mcadams at gmail.com (Joshua McAdams) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:35:08 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] advanced perl training in chicagoland In-Reply-To: <470510A5.1070508@wrkhors.com> References: <841e880a0709280713r7e4b5c5auaf30390e8c4e04f2@mail.gmail.com> <2715accf0710011327j3488ceefxca04b7140432d3f1@mail.gmail.com> <841e880a0710030530u1ca4f051q4e5c38ce9786c892@mail.gmail.com> <470510A5.1070508@wrkhors.com> Message-ID: <49d805d70710041135g3c177e09vfe8da906177dec80@mail.gmail.com> > Might also want to see about the upcoming weekend > in Pittsburg. They might have something that would > work for you. London.pm did a "Teach-In" over the course of four Saturdays. I'm not sure if the event was a paid event or a free one; however, something like that might be good for the Chicago area on occasion. Anyone interested? From jon at jrock.us Thu Oct 4 13:49:33 2007 From: jon at jrock.us (Jonathan Rockway) Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:49:33 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] advanced perl training in chicagoland In-Reply-To: <49d805d70710041135g3c177e09vfe8da906177dec80@mail.gmail.com> References: <841e880a0709280713r7e4b5c5auaf30390e8c4e04f2@mail.gmail.com> <2715accf0710011327j3488ceefxca04b7140432d3f1@mail.gmail.com> <841e880a0710030530u1ca4f051q4e5c38ce9786c892@mail.gmail.com> <470510A5.1070508@wrkhors.com> <49d805d70710041135g3c177e09vfe8da906177dec80@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <470551DD.7010409@jrock.us> Joshua McAdams wrote: >> Might also want to see about the upcoming weekend >> in Pittsburg. They might have something that would >> work for you. >> > > London.pm did a "Teach-In" over the course of four Saturdays. I'm not > sure if the event was a paid event or a free one; however, something > like that might be good for the Chicago area on occasion. Anyone > interested? It was free, and certainly was a good idea. It would be nice to have some Perl-related activity to fill the void between PPW and Frozen Perl :) Regards, Jonathan Rockway -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 370 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071004/e2937210/attachment.bin From warren.lindsey at gmail.com Thu Oct 4 14:34:14 2007 From: warren.lindsey at gmail.com (warren.lindsey at gmail.com) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:34:14 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] advanced perl training in chicagoland In-Reply-To: <470551DD.7010409@jrock.us> References: <841e880a0709280713r7e4b5c5auaf30390e8c4e04f2@mail.gmail.com> <2715accf0710011327j3488ceefxca04b7140432d3f1@mail.gmail.com> <841e880a0710030530u1ca4f051q4e5c38ce9786c892@mail.gmail.com> <470510A5.1070508@wrkhors.com> <49d805d70710041135g3c177e09vfe8da906177dec80@mail.gmail.com> <470551DD.7010409@jrock.us> Message-ID: <841e880a0710041434h3ec627c3xd86f10958f7c28b9@mail.gmail.com> So it sounds like there aren't many options in chicago besides stonehenge. On 10/4/07, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > Joshua McAdams wrote: > >> Might also want to see about the upcoming weekend > >> in Pittsburg. They might have something that would > >> work for you. > >> > > > > London.pm did a "Teach-In" over the course of four Saturdays. I'm not > > sure if the event was a paid event or a free one; however, something > > like that might be good for the Chicago area on occasion. Anyone > > interested? > > It was free, and certainly was a good idea. It would be nice to have > some Perl-related activity to fill the void between PPW and Frozen Perl :) > > Regards, > Jonathan Rockway > > > From orders at siraim.com Thu Oct 4 14:58:54 2007 From: orders at siraim.com (Orders Guy) Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] advanced perl training in chicagoland In-Reply-To: <841e880a0710041434h3ec627c3xd86f10958f7c28b9@mail.gmail.com> References: <841e880a0709280713r7e4b5c5auaf30390e8c4e04f2@mail.gmail.com> <2715accf0710011327j3488ceefxca04b7140432d3f1@mail.gmail.com> <841e880a0710030530u1ca4f051q4e5c38ce9786c892@mail.gmail.com> <470510A5.1070508@wrkhors.com> <49d805d70710041135g3c177e09vfe8da906177dec80@mail.gmail.com> <470551DD.7010409@jrock.us> <841e880a0710041434h3ec627c3xd86f10958f7c28b9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4705621E.1050501@siraim.com> Sun usually has a course or two downtown at their offices... warren.lindsey at gmail.com wrote: > So it sounds like there aren't many options in chicago besides stonehenge. > > On 10/4/07, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > >> Joshua McAdams wrote: >> >>>> Might also want to see about the upcoming weekend >>>> in Pittsburg. They might have something that would >>>> work for you. >>>> >>>> >>> London.pm did a "Teach-In" over the course of four Saturdays. I'm not >>> sure if the event was a paid event or a free one; however, something >>> like that might be good for the Chicago area on occasion. Anyone >>> interested? >>> >> It was free, and certainly was a good idea. It would be nice to have >> some Perl-related activity to fill the void between PPW and Frozen Perl :) >> >> Regards, >> Jonathan Rockway >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > From jon at jrock.us Sun Oct 7 00:19:43 2007 From: jon at jrock.us (Jonathan Rockway) Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 02:19:43 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Chicago Perl Workshop 2007? Message-ID: <4708888F.7000906@jrock.us> At the Perl lunch on Friday, some proposals for a workshop in December were floated (since it's almost 4 months between PPW and Frozen Perl, and who can go without a Perl conference for that long!?). Here were the ideas: * A 1 or 2 day mini-conference at PFX (or Hacklab? in Pilsen). This would be free if we can get presenters for free. * A hackathon at the youth hostel downtown. Perhaps we could do some talks too. * Paid, open-enrollment training by Stonehenge at a hotel downtown. I would like to do something that is Friday/Saturday/Sunday since that is long enough to convince people from other cities to show up. My pipe dream is a 3 day hackathon, where half the day (or so) is open hacking, and the other half is structured talks. That might be a pain to organize, though, so I'm interested in other ideas. The idea is to keep it interesting, educational, low-cost, close to downtown, and easy to organize (since most of us are busy organizing YAPC). BTW, the idea that inspired this was London's Perl Teach-In and LPW: http://london.pm.org/teach-in/, http://conferences.yapceurope.org/lpw2007/. Apparently they are expecting 200 people! Awesome! Anyway, your feedback would be appreciated. What are you interested in? What would you like to do to help? Thanks in advance! Regards, Jonathan Rockway -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 370 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071007/ece30ae5/attachment.bin From andy at petdance.com Sun Oct 7 11:52:17 2007 From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 13:52:17 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Tuesday's Chicago.pm meeting will be short and/or boring unless YOU help Message-ID: Our next suburban meeting is on Tuesday, and we have exactly one person (me) who will be talking about tools. Sounds like it will last about 15-20 minutes, and then we're done. There's only one way to solve this problem: Other people need to contribute. Please let me know if you'd like to talk about the tools you use. Only YOU can save Chicago.PM meetings from lack of content. Thanks, xoxo, Andy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Chicago Perl Mongers / UniForum Meeting Announcement ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Topic: Chicago Perl Mongers Tool Expo Presenter: You! Moderator: Andy Lester Date/Time: Tuesday, October 9th, 2007, 7:00 PM Location: IIT-Rice Campus, 201 East Loop Rd, Wheaton, IL Afterward: Dinner at CozyMel's ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- We'll be sharing the tools that we use for Perl programming. Anything that helps you do your job is worth mentioning, and we'd like you to talk about it. Andy Lester will be talking about ack, his grep replacement, and OpenKomodo, which just got release as open source. Now we need YOUR help. What tools do you use? vim? emacs? TextMate? BBEdit? Eclipse? What about other tools, like Ant? CruiseControl? We want to hear from you. A 10-15 minute demo is all you need to do to help spread the love. We especially want to hear from the UniForum people! If you'd like to talk about your favorite tool, let Andy Lester know at andy at petdance.com. Even if you don't have a laptop to do a presentation on, we can work something out. As with all Chicago Perl Mongers meetings, everyone is welcome, whether or not you consider yourself a member. We look forward to seeing you there! Questions about this meeting? Ask on the chicago-talk at pm.org mailing list, or send email to andy at petdance dot com. You can also see a list of past and upcoming meetings at http://chicago.pm.org/meetings/. -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance From joshua.mcadams at gmail.com Sun Oct 7 13:12:38 2007 From: joshua.mcadams at gmail.com (Joshua McAdams) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Chicago Perl Workshop 2007? In-Reply-To: <4708888F.7000906@jrock.us> References: <4708888F.7000906@jrock.us> Message-ID: <49d805d70710071312i724d4e44y9f63d9b767a5ee82@mail.gmail.com> > Anyway, your feedback would be appreciated. What are you interested > in? What would you like to do to help? Thanks in advance! Sounds like something that TPF might provide a grant for. I've contacted Hosteling International for pricing. They have meeting rooms that can accommodate 60 people. That's seems like a big enough place for a hack-a-thon. From a.wong2.nu at gmail.com Sun Oct 7 19:06:19 2007 From: a.wong2.nu at gmail.com (Tony Wong) Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 21:06:19 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Chicago Perl Workshop 2007? In-Reply-To: <4708888F.7000906@jrock.us> References: <4708888F.7000906@jrock.us> Message-ID: <334a3ab20710071906r2e17a1bfs376a391399856dd4@mail.gmail.com> All of these ideas are great. Since I couldn't make it to YAPC this year and I will not be able to go to Pittsburgh, having something in Chicago would be fantastic. I'd be very glad to lend a hand with whatever needs to be done. Tony > * A 1 or 2 day mini-conference at PFX (or Hacklab? in Pilsen). This > would be free if we can get presenters for free. > > * A hackathon at the youth hostel downtown. Perhaps we could do some > talks too. > > * Paid, open-enrollment training by Stonehenge at a hotel downtown. > > I would like to do something that is Friday/Saturday/Sunday since that > is long enough to convince people from other cities to show up. My pipe > dream is a 3 day hackathon, where half the day (or so) is open hacking, > and the other half is structured talks. That might be a pain to > organize, though, so I'm interested in other ideas. The idea is to keep > it interesting, educational, low-cost, close to downtown, and easy to > organize (since most of us are busy organizing YAPC). > > BTW, the idea that inspired this was London's Perl Teach-In and LPW: > http://london.pm.org/teach-in/, > http://conferences.yapceurope.org/lpw2007/. Apparently they are > expecting 200 people! Awesome! > > Anyway, your feedback would be appreciated. What are you interested > in? What would you like to do to help? Thanks in advance! > > Regards, > Jonathan Rockway > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > > From joshua.mcadams at gmail.com Mon Oct 8 10:38:11 2007 From: joshua.mcadams at gmail.com (Joshua McAdams) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 12:38:11 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Fwd: Thanks for your interest in Hostelling International Chicago In-Reply-To: <001d01c809dc$c86b7600$ca01a8c0@EmilyLENOVO> References: <001d01c809dc$c86b7600$ca01a8c0@EmilyLENOVO> Message-ID: <49d805d70710081038u19ab8942j88a9530faf5fef54@mail.gmail.com> Looks like HI Chicago is an option for a weekend hack-a-thon. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Emily Paxson Date: Oct 8, 2007 1:55 PM Subject: Thanks for your interest in Hostelling International Chicago To: joshua.mcadams at gmail.com Hi Mr. McAdams, Thank you for your interest in Hostelling International Chicago! I'm so glad to hear of your interest in bringing a group to stay here in December. We do have availability the weekend of December 14-16. We are a great hostel in the heart of downtown Chicago, just blocks from the Art Institute, Grant Park, Millennium Park, Museum Campus and the Magnificent Mile. We are also within steps of all major bus and train lines to get you to any other place in the city that you wish to visit. Do you know what your plans are for while you're in the city? I would be more than happy to offer you recommendations of things to do while you are here. We have discounts to many area attractions, such as the Sears Tower, Hancock Observatory, IMAX Theatre at Navy Pier, Museum of Contemporary Art, Untouchables Gangster Tours, walking tours with the Chicago Architecture Foundation, bike tours with Bobby's Bike Hike, and river tours with Chicago from the Lake. We also have discounts to Stefani's Tuscany Caf? for a great meal or Kingston Mines if you like blues. Rates range from $27 to $33/person/night plus tax, depending on room type. Some rooms have an en suite bath ($33-$31) and others have a shared bath in the hall ($29-$27). Please reference which room type you would prefer. The rooms are separated by gender, and we try to keep groups in rooms to themselves, with no outside travelers. The Hostel offers a continental breakfast for each guest. You also have the option of storing your own food and making it in our state-of-the-art kitchen. In order to confirm a reservation with us, I will need you to fill out a group contract and return a signed copy to us along with a 50% deposit. Your final balance along with your final numbers is due 14 business days prior to arrival. Once you are ready to book, I can prepare a contract for you and email it as an attachment. You will then have 2 weeks to return the contract to us with a deposit in order to guarantee your dates and rates. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to hearing back from you soon. Best regards, Emily Emily Paxson Group Sales Manager at Hostelling International Chicago 24 E. Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60605-1226 USA epaxson at hichicago.org direct: 312-583-2216 Fax: 312-360-0313 www.hichicago.org We bring the world to Chicago! Click here to sign up for our free e-newsletter! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Hostels info FY08.doc Type: application/msword Size: 47616 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071008/55af0db6/attachment-0002.doc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Hostel Discounts and Tickets.doc Type: application/msword Size: 57344 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071008/55af0db6/attachment-0003.doc From andy at petdance.com Mon Oct 8 10:59:16 2007 From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 12:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists Message-ID: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> I believe we are now seeing the negative impact of having a separate windycity.pm mailing list: Those who are only subscribed to windycity.pm and not chicago.pm, or vice versa, don't know what is going on in the other list while discussing this hackathon idea. -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance From adam at battleaxe.net Mon Oct 8 11:08:41 2007 From: adam at battleaxe.net (Adam Israel) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:08:41 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> References: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> Message-ID: I didn't even know there was a windycity.pm. Off to subscribe now, thanks. -Adam On 10/8/07, Andy Lester wrote: > I believe we are now seeing the negative impact of having a separate > windycity.pm mailing list: Those who are only subscribed to > windycity.pm and not chicago.pm, or vice versa, don't know what is > going on in the other list while discussing this hackathon idea. > > -- > Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance > From andy at petdance.com Mon Oct 8 11:33:48 2007 From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:33:48 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: References: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> Message-ID: <20071008183348.GA14543@petdance.com> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 01:08:41PM -0500, Adam Israel (adam at battleaxe.net) wrote: > I didn't even know there was a windycity.pm. Off to subscribe now, thanks. Thing is, Adam, my point was that there doesn't need to be a separate list. We don't need to have two lists when it's largely overlap. It's unnecessarily segregated. -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance From chicago.pm at galumph.com Mon Oct 8 12:04:07 2007 From: chicago.pm at galumph.com (Elliot Shank) Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:04:07 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: <20071008183348.GA14543@petdance.com> References: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> <20071008183348.GA14543@petdance.com> Message-ID: <470A7F27.9040105@galumph.com> Andy Lester wrote: > Thing is, Adam, my point was that there doesn't need to be a separate > list. We don't need to have two lists when it's largely overlap. > It's unnecessarily segregated. Ummm... exactly how much traffic does that other list get? I count a whopping grand total of 28 messages since June 1st, and the vast majority of them are duplicates of announcements included here. Just ignore it Andy. There's nothing there worth worrying about. From e.ellington at gmail.com Mon Oct 8 12:06:27 2007 From: e.ellington at gmail.com (Eric Ellington) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 14:06:27 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: <20071008183348.GA14543@petdance.com> References: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> <20071008183348.GA14543@petdance.com> Message-ID: I agree that it has been a seemingly unnecessary segregation. However, as a lurker on these lists I have yet to pipe up about it. I see Andy and others who say they are from the burbs all the time at city functions. Who knows maybe one day there will be something cool enough to make me go way out to Weaton. On 10/8/07, Andy Lester wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 01:08:41PM -0500, Adam Israel (adam at battleaxe.net) wrote: > > I didn't even know there was a windycity.pm. Off to subscribe now, thanks. > > Thing is, Adam, my point was that there doesn't need to be a separate > list. We don't need to have two lists when it's largely overlap. It's > unnecessarily segregated. > > -- > Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > -- Eric Ellington e.ellington at gmail.com From warren.lindsey at gmail.com Mon Oct 8 17:11:54 2007 From: warren.lindsey at gmail.com (Warren Lindsey) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:11:54 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> References: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> Message-ID: <841e880a0710081711t2140b87fi897d665d8c075bfc@mail.gmail.com> I thought the reason the list was split was because there were two groups of Perl Mongers in the Chicagoland area: 1-Chicago.pm covers Chicago and the suburbs 2-WindyCity.pm covers the City of Chicago Which is comprised of three groups of people: 1-People who don't want to go to the city. 2-People who don't want to go to the burbs. 3-People who will go anywhere. As such, you should subscribe accordingly. On 10/8/07, Andy Lester wrote: > I believe we are now seeing the negative impact of having a separate > windycity.pm mailing list: Those who are only subscribed to > windycity.pm and not chicago.pm, or vice versa, don't know what is > going on in the other list while discussing this hackathon idea. > > -- > Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > From jim at jimandkoka.com Mon Oct 8 17:16:36 2007 From: jim at jimandkoka.com (Jim Thomason) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:16:36 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: <841e880a0710081711t2140b87fi897d665d8c075bfc@mail.gmail.com> References: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> <841e880a0710081711t2140b87fi897d665d8c075bfc@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5cfdfaf70710081716qefbd775oe99385a82ab7c425@mail.gmail.com> The concept that the list was split because there are two groups of perl mongers was declared by fiat. I don't see the point. Hell, even that breakdown is arbitrary and silly. North side or south side? Hell, north suburbs or south suburbs? I went to the get togethers in Vernon Hills all the time 'cuz it was crazy convenient for me. Wheaton? Not so much. I mean, how many people are there on the list? The site lists 19 (unless I miscounted). Let's assume that that's wildly inaccurate and only 1/3rd of the users registered. So we have 60 people. Hell, let's say it's 100 people. How many mailing lists do 100 people need to coordinate the same information? I'm not going to subscribe to multiple local lists just to get duplicate posts of the same messages, the same questions, and the same events. The split was silly. -Jim..... On 10/8/07, Warren Lindsey wrote: > I thought the reason the list was split was because there were two > groups of Perl Mongers in the Chicagoland area: > > 1-Chicago.pm covers Chicago and the suburbs > 2-WindyCity.pm covers the City of Chicago > > Which is comprised of three groups of people: > > 1-People who don't want to go to the city. > 2-People who don't want to go to the burbs. > 3-People who will go anywhere. > > As such, you should subscribe accordingly. > > On 10/8/07, Andy Lester wrote: > > I believe we are now seeing the negative impact of having a separate > > windycity.pm mailing list: Those who are only subscribed to > > windycity.pm and not chicago.pm, or vice versa, don't know what is > > going on in the other list while discussing this hackathon idea. > > > > -- > > Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Chicago-talk mailing list > > Chicago-talk at pm.org > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > From andy at petdance.com Mon Oct 8 17:19:36 2007 From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: <5cfdfaf70710081716qefbd775oe99385a82ab7c425@mail.gmail.com> References: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> <841e880a0710081711t2140b87fi897d665d8c075bfc@mail.gmail.com> <5cfdfaf70710081716qefbd775oe99385a82ab7c425@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1F4FB688-E073-46D3-84F1-63EE408D97D1@petdance.com> On Oct 8, 2007, at 7:16 PM, Jim Thomason wrote: >> 1-People who don't want to go to the city. >> 2-People who don't want to go to the burbs. >> 3-People who will go anywhere. The Chicago Perl community is more than just who will attend which meeting. What about questions people have about Perl? Organizing events like YAPC? etc etc etc? If Chicago.PM was nothing more than meetings, sure, it would make sense. But it's not, and it doesn't. -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance From warren.lindsey at gmail.com Mon Oct 8 17:59:39 2007 From: warren.lindsey at gmail.com (Warren Lindsey) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:59:39 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: <1F4FB688-E073-46D3-84F1-63EE408D97D1@petdance.com> References: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> <841e880a0710081711t2140b87fi897d665d8c075bfc@mail.gmail.com> <5cfdfaf70710081716qefbd775oe99385a82ab7c425@mail.gmail.com> <1F4FB688-E073-46D3-84F1-63EE408D97D1@petdance.com> Message-ID: <841e880a0710081759l6ef8628cm5550d916e1f8f3a@mail.gmail.com> It's not just split lists that cause this, it is split groups. Two groups and two lists is silly. We should just have one group and alternate months in different locations. Isn't that how it worked when it was Chicago.pm and Uniforum meetings? At some point, the Uniforum meeting became the dual Chicago.pm meeting. Wasn't Uniforum more than just Perl? I don't attend alot of meetings, but I've attended them at different venues. Location is not important to me, but scheduling of a meeting so that I can get there in time is. I will attend a meeting anywhere within an hour of Chicago, if the topic is interesting and I can get out of work in time to reach that destination. On 10/8/07, Andy Lester wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2007, at 7:16 PM, Jim Thomason wrote: > > >> 1-People who don't want to go to the city. > >> 2-People who don't want to go to the burbs. > >> 3-People who will go anywhere. > > The Chicago Perl community is more than just who will attend which > meeting. What about questions people have about Perl? Organizing > events like YAPC? etc etc etc? If Chicago.PM was nothing more than > meetings, sure, it would make sense. But it's not, and it doesn't. > > -- > Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > From andy at petdance.com Mon Oct 8 18:05:52 2007 From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:05:52 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: <841e880a0710081759l6ef8628cm5550d916e1f8f3a@mail.gmail.com> References: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> <841e880a0710081711t2140b87fi897d665d8c075bfc@mail.gmail.com> <5cfdfaf70710081716qefbd775oe99385a82ab7c425@mail.gmail.com> <1F4FB688-E073-46D3-84F1-63EE408D97D1@petdance.com> <841e880a0710081759l6ef8628cm5550d916e1f8f3a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Oct 8, 2007, at 7:59 PM, Warren Lindsey wrote: > Two groups and two lists is silly. We should just have one group and > alternate months in different locations. We have exactly what you're saying. We have one group, and we have meetings in alternate locations, where the 2nd Tuesday is in the suburbs, and the 4th Tuesday is in the city. -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance From mrnicksgirl at gmail.com Mon Oct 8 18:12:48 2007 From: mrnicksgirl at gmail.com (Nola Stowe) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:12:48 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: References: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> <841e880a0710081711t2140b87fi897d665d8c075bfc@mail.gmail.com> <5cfdfaf70710081716qefbd775oe99385a82ab7c425@mail.gmail.com> <1F4FB688-E073-46D3-84F1-63EE408D97D1@petdance.com> <841e880a0710081759l6ef8628cm5550d916e1f8f3a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <43e95380710081812u40c05a04t6df99deb3e0dab90@mail.gmail.com> The list was created mainly because my annoucements for Perl Lunch were rejected to the annoucelist. I didnt want to send to the chatter list because there was only a small number interested anyways. Simple as that. On 10/8/07, Andy Lester wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2007, at 7:59 PM, Warren Lindsey wrote: > > > Two groups and two lists is silly. We should just have one group and > > alternate months in different locations. > > We have exactly what you're saying. > > We have one group, and we have meetings in alternate locations, where > the 2nd Tuesday is in the suburbs, and the 4th Tuesday is in the city. > > > -- > Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > -- http://rubygeek.com - my blog featuring: Ruby, PHP and Perl http://DevChix.com - boys can't have all the fun From jim at jimandkoka.com Mon Oct 8 18:17:00 2007 From: jim at jimandkoka.com (Jim Thomason) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:17:00 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: <43e95380710081812u40c05a04t6df99deb3e0dab90@mail.gmail.com> References: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> <841e880a0710081711t2140b87fi897d665d8c075bfc@mail.gmail.com> <5cfdfaf70710081716qefbd775oe99385a82ab7c425@mail.gmail.com> <1F4FB688-E073-46D3-84F1-63EE408D97D1@petdance.com> <841e880a0710081759l6ef8628cm5550d916e1f8f3a@mail.gmail.com> <43e95380710081812u40c05a04t6df99deb3e0dab90@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <5cfdfaf70710081817o2db7398eod22afdd43723ae5c@mail.gmail.com> On 10/8/07, Nola Stowe wrote: > The list was created mainly because my annoucements for Perl Lunch > were rejected to the annoucelist. > > I didnt want to send to the chatter list because there was only a > small number interested anyways. > > Simple as that. This sounds like an extraordinarily complicated solution for a simple problem. Alternative: Post lunch announcements to the Chicago.pm chatter list. With a reasonable subject ("Let's do lunch!") I won't even open it. Assuming it hits at the same time as a bunch of other messages I'm archiving unread, it's not even any additional work for me ("Select all" -> "Archive"). Trying to create a separate group with a separate list just for the occasional lunch email seems like overengineering to me. -Jim..... From andy at petdance.com Mon Oct 8 18:17:01 2007 From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester) Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:17:01 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: <43e95380710081812u40c05a04t6df99deb3e0dab90@mail.gmail.com> References: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> <841e880a0710081711t2140b87fi897d665d8c075bfc@mail.gmail.com> <5cfdfaf70710081716qefbd775oe99385a82ab7c425@mail.gmail.com> <1F4FB688-E073-46D3-84F1-63EE408D97D1@petdance.com> <841e880a0710081759l6ef8628cm5550d916e1f8f3a@mail.gmail.com> <43e95380710081812u40c05a04t6df99deb3e0dab90@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <71BF0D9B-6793-44D8-8E5B-BAA9F041F023@petdance.com> On Oct 8, 2007, at 8:12 PM, Nola Stowe wrote: > The list was created mainly because my annoucements for Perl Lunch > were rejected to the annoucelist. So rather than furthering the misconception that windycity.pm ne chicago.pm, why not create a list that is chicago-pm-social, or something similar? Where it's inclusive, not exclusive? Better yet, how about saying "Hey, Andy, my announcements for Perl Lunch keep getting rejected, can we do something about that?" -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance From ccf3 at mindspring.com Mon Oct 8 18:34:27 2007 From: ccf3 at mindspring.com (Clyde Forrester) Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 20:34:27 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: <5cfdfaf70710081817o2db7398eod22afdd43723ae5c@mail.gmail.com> References: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> <841e880a0710081711t2140b87fi897d665d8c075bfc@mail.gmail.com> <5cfdfaf70710081716qefbd775oe99385a82ab7c425@mail.gmail.com> <1F4FB688-E073-46D3-84F1-63EE408D97D1@petdance.com> <841e880a0710081759l6ef8628cm5550d916e1f8f3a@mail.gmail.com> <43e95380710081812u40c05a04t6df99deb3e0dab90@mail.gmail.com> <5cfdfaf70710081817o2db7398eod22afdd43723ae5c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <470ADAA3.70404@mindspring.com> Jim Thomason wrote: > On 10/8/07, Nola Stowe wrote: > >> The list was created mainly because my annoucements for Perl Lunch >> were rejected to the annoucelist. >> >> I didnt want to send to the chatter list because there was only a >> small number interested anyways. >> >> Simple as that. >> > > This sounds like an extraordinarily complicated solution for a simple problem. > It appears to be a simple solution which has worked rather well. The announcements are well targeted, and do not bounce. Clyde From frag at ripco.com Tue Oct 9 08:09:18 2007 From: frag at ripco.com (Mike Fragassi) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 10:09:18 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: <1F4FB688-E073-46D3-84F1-63EE408D97D1@petdance.com> References: <8A9D77F1-43A2-46EA-A9C5-63C7DC23FEBB@petdance.com> <841e880a0710081711t2140b87fi897d665d8c075bfc@mail.gmail.com> <5cfdfaf70710081716qefbd775oe99385a82ab7c425@mail.gmail.com> <1F4FB688-E073-46D3-84F1-63EE408D97D1@petdance.com> Message-ID: I've got to agree that the list splitting was not a good idea. (Among other things, no one told me about the new list for a while; I saw no public posting of the list's creation to Chicago-talk. I still don't see anything like that; while newcomers have been turning up on Chicago-talk, are they subscribing to WindyCity-pm?) But then I also don't like having separate *-announce lists in the first place. It would be one thing if the list had the traffic of perl5-porters, long inane threads with no relevance to Perl, or trolling problems, but we don't. (Except for the occasional meta thread, like this.) In any case, as an example of the problem with multiple lists, some of the posts about the forthcoming hackathon are only getting sent to WindyCity-pm instead of Chicago-talk, which is a bad idea since a hackathon would concern more than just the people downtown. I suppose it beats multiple copies of each email for those of us subscribed to both, but it should be all on a single general unmoderated list that covers the whole area, which seems to be Chicago-talk. (I mean, no one actually has approval/rejection power for posts on Chicago-talk, right?) My preferred solutions would be one of the following: 1. "WindyCity-pm" list should be strictly for downtown announcements, in which case it would be better off rechristened WindyCity-announce for clarity. Talk planning for forthcoming downtown events (hackathon, Stonehenge classes, etc.) should be kept on the Chicago-talk list until an actual announcement is ready. Whether WindyCity-announce is open or has a moderator granting approval doesn't matter much unless the list starts to be abused. 2. One Big List. You yourself indicate announcements by slapping [ANNOUNCE] to the start of the Subject: when you mail. No gatekeeping. People who don't like chatter are offered a hand with email filtering recipes. -- Mike F. From Andy_Bach at wiwb.uscourts.gov Tue Oct 9 10:21:40 2007 From: Andy_Bach at wiwb.uscourts.gov (Andy_Bach at wiwb.uscourts.gov) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:21:40 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists In-Reply-To: <841e880a0710081759l6ef8628cm5550d916e1f8f3a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hmmm, this rings a bell http://www.mwscomp.com/movies/brian/brian-07.htm REG: Right. You're in. Listen. The only people we hate more than the Romans are the fucking Judean People's Front. P.F.J.: Yeah... JUDITH: Splitters. P.F.J.: Splitters... FRANCIS: And the Judean Popular People's Front. P.F.J.: Yeah. Oh, yeah. Splitters. Splitters... LORETTA: And the People's Front of Judea. P.F.J.: Yeah. Splitters. Splitters... REG: What? LORETTA: The People's Front of Judea. Splitters. REG: We're the People's Front of Judea! LORETTA: Oh. I thought we were the Popular Front. REG: People's Front! C-huh. FRANCIS: Whatever happened to the Popular Front, Reg? REG: He's over there. P.F.J.: Splitter! a Andy Bach Systems Mangler Internet: andy_bach at wiwb.uscourts.gov VOICE: (608) 261-5738 FAX 264-5932 Wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. And radio operates exactly the same way. The only difference is that there is no cat. --Albert Einstein (explaining radio) From andy at petdance.com Wed Oct 17 12:56:16 2007 From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:56:16 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Hacking your printer Message-ID: <29CBA641-52CA-4B59-98DF-AF8466179DE7@petdance.com> Chicago.PM's own Yaakov Sloman (OK, he's in Indiana, but we're the closest he has) is on Boing Boing today with his hack to change the message on your HP printer. http://www.boingboing.net/2007/10/17/howto-change-the-pri.html xoxo, Andyu -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance From merlyn at stonehenge.com Wed Oct 17 17:01:20 2007 From: merlyn at stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:01:20 -0700 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Hacking your printer In-Reply-To: <29CBA641-52CA-4B59-98DF-AF8466179DE7@petdance.com> (Andy Lester's message of "Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:56:16 -0500") References: <29CBA641-52CA-4B59-98DF-AF8466179DE7@petdance.com> Message-ID: <867illnve7.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> >>>>> "Andy" == Andy Lester writes: Andy> Chicago.PM's own Yaakov Sloman (OK, he's in Indiana, but we're the Andy> closest he has) is on Boing Boing today with his hack to change the Andy> message on your HP printer. Andy> http://www.boingboing.net/2007/10/17/howto-change-the-pri.html It's too bad he says "stdin" when he means "the command line". Oh well. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! From wsmith at etc.com Sat Oct 20 15:22:03 2007 From: wsmith at etc.com (wsmith at etc.com) Date: 20 Oct 2007 22:22:03 -0000 Subject: [Chicago-talk] UniForum: Old Pentiums Message-ID: <02601EDA-0F99-4C52-94B4-40458AB402AC@etc.com> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------- How to Revive an Old Pentium Howard Fosdick Tuesday, October 23rd 2007, 7:00-9:00pm Illinois Institute of Technology, Rice Campus, Wheaton, IL, Room 103 Abstract -------- This presentation will be about how to use older PC's to get that something else done on a computer without spending a lot of money. 1. What you can do with older PCs 2. How to take mature Pentiums and make them useful 3. Where to get a free computer! 4. What you can use that old computer in your basement for. 5. What operating systems (and versions) to install 6. Where to get all the free software you'll want -- to do ANYTHING you want 7. How to judge what software is appropriate to run on various mature Pentiums 8. How to "anonymize" your old PC before giving it away to charity Speaker Bio ----------- Howard Fosdick is an independent DBA consultant in the Chicago area who works hands-on with Oracle databases. He's also advised software and hardware vendors about the database market and technologies. Getting There ------------- The next meeting of UniForum Chicago will be from 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2007 at the Illinois Institute of Technology Rice campus. The address of the meeting facility is: IIT's Rice Campus Room 103 201 East Loop Road, Wheaton, Illinois 60187 Take I-88 to the Naperville Road exit. Go North on Naperville Road to Butterfield/Rt. 56. Turn right on Butterfield and proceed East to the next stoplight East (East Loop Road). Turn north onto East Loop Road (Big Bowl/Cozymel's Restaurants and Phillip's 66 Gas Station on the corners); the campus will be on your right about a block north of Butterfield Road. Park in the student parking lot behind the building. Room 103 is the first room inside the north entrance. More detailed directions and maps are available at: http://www.rice.iit.edu/directions.html http://www.rice.iit.edu/floorplan.html All UniForum Chicago general meetings are open to the public free of charge. For additional information contact Scott Nemec at (630) 990-6265 or president at uniforum.chi.il.us, or visit the UniForum Chicago web site at: http://www.uniforum.chi.il.us/ From frag at ripco.com Mon Oct 22 07:45:17 2007 From: frag at ripco.com (Mike Fragassi) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:45:17 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [Chicago-talk] use.perl.org - unreadable? Message-ID: Am I the only one out there who can't read the new javascript comments in use.perl.org? (Firefox 2.0.0.8 Win Xp with noscript 1.1.7.2 permiting perl.org javascript.) Taking for e.g. http://use.perl.org/comments.pl?sid=37308 pulling the slider to '11 Full', many of the comments only show partially, e.g. http://use.perl.org/comments.pl?sid=37308&cid=58513 stops at "If that's not in the cards," The rest of the comment is not there, even when I view source. And switching to classic view doesn't persist; switching the comment mode form elements jumps you back to what I'm beginning to think of as the New Coke view. Is this just me? Is there anything I can do, besides giving up reading use.perl except for the front page? -- Mike F. From tigerpeng2001 at yahoo.com Mon Oct 22 07:52:33 2007 From: tigerpeng2001 at yahoo.com (tiger peng) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:52:33 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters Message-ID: <86182.62961.qm@web58706.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Hello, There must be better way for removing the double quote in a CSV file optionally quoted by double quote. What I did as below is ugly and not reliable. Could anyone provide one beautify line? $delimiter=chr(0227); s/^"/$delimiter/g; s/,"/,$delimiter/g; s/"$/$delimiter/g; s/",/$delimiter,/g; s/"//g; s/$delimiter/"/g; -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071022/16d5e8ba/attachment.html From a.wong2.nu at gmail.com Mon Oct 22 07:54:32 2007 From: a.wong2.nu at gmail.com (Tony Wong) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:54:32 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] use.perl.org - unreadable? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <334a3ab20710220754t56a62638s3af392df212cc372@mail.gmail.com> You aren't the only one. I just checked it and am getting the same thing with the comments. I have pretty much the same setup as you as well (XP, Firefox 2.0.0.8). Tony On 10/22/07, Mike Fragassi wrote: > > Am I the only one out there who can't read the new javascript comments > in use.perl.org? (Firefox 2.0.0.8 Win Xp with noscript 1.1.7.2 > permiting perl.org javascript.) > > Taking for e.g. > http://use.perl.org/comments.pl?sid=37308 > pulling the slider to '11 Full', many of the comments only show > partially, e.g. http://use.perl.org/comments.pl?sid=37308&cid=58513 > stops at "If that's not in the cards," The rest of the comment is not > there, even when I view source. > > And switching to classic view doesn't persist; switching the comment > mode form elements jumps you back to what I'm beginning to think of as > the New Coke view. > > Is this just me? Is there anything I can do, besides giving up reading > use.perl except for the front page? > > -- Mike F. > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > From jason at froebe.net Mon Oct 22 07:55:02 2007 From: jason at froebe.net (Jason L. Froebe) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:55:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Chicago-talk] use.perl.org - unreadable? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <647841.90435.qm@web801.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Works fine here: Firefox 2.0.0.8 with noscript 1.1.7.2 on Vista business. Does clearing the cache help? jason --- Mike Fragassi wrote: > > Am I the only one out there who can't read the new javascript > comments > in use.perl.org? (Firefox 2.0.0.8 Win Xp with noscript 1.1.7.2 > permiting perl.org javascript.) > > Taking for e.g. > http://use.perl.org/comments.pl?sid=37308 > pulling the slider to '11 Full', many of the comments only show > partially, e.g. http://use.perl.org/comments.pl?sid=37308&cid=58513 > stops at "If that's not in the cards," The rest of the comment is > not > there, even when I view source. > > And switching to classic view doesn't persist; switching the comment > mode form elements jumps you back to what I'm beginning to think of > as > the New Coke view. > > Is this just me? Is there anything I can do, besides giving up > reading > use.perl except for the front page? > > -- Mike F. > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > Jason L. Froebe WebBlog http://jfroebe.livejournal.com Tech log http://www.froebe.net/blog Froebe Fibers http://www.froebe-fibers.com From jason at froebe.net Mon Oct 22 07:55:02 2007 From: jason at froebe.net (Jason L. Froebe) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:55:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Chicago-talk] use.perl.org - unreadable? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <647841.90435.qm@web801.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Works fine here: Firefox 2.0.0.8 with noscript 1.1.7.2 on Vista business. Does clearing the cache help? jason --- Mike Fragassi wrote: > > Am I the only one out there who can't read the new javascript > comments > in use.perl.org? (Firefox 2.0.0.8 Win Xp with noscript 1.1.7.2 > permiting perl.org javascript.) > > Taking for e.g. > http://use.perl.org/comments.pl?sid=37308 > pulling the slider to '11 Full', many of the comments only show > partially, e.g. http://use.perl.org/comments.pl?sid=37308&cid=58513 > stops at "If that's not in the cards," The rest of the comment is > not > there, even when I view source. > > And switching to classic view doesn't persist; switching the comment > mode form elements jumps you back to what I'm beginning to think of > as > the New Coke view. > > Is this just me? Is there anything I can do, besides giving up > reading > use.perl except for the front page? > > -- Mike F. > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > Jason L. Froebe WebBlog http://jfroebe.livejournal.com Tech log http://www.froebe.net/blog Froebe Fibers http://www.froebe-fibers.com From mongers at bsod.net Mon Oct 22 07:58:10 2007 From: mongers at bsod.net (Pete Krawczyk) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:58:10 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [Chicago-talk] October 23, 2007: Make Your Own CPAN Message-ID: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chicago Perl Mongers Meeting Announcement -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Topic: Make Your Own CPAN Presenter: brian d foy Date/Time: Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007, 7:00 PM Location: Performics, 12th Floor, 180 N. LaSalle, Chicago, IL RSVP: By noon on Oct. 23rd to "pkrawczyk" with "doubleclick.com" -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Want your own CPAN? Need to add your own modules, take out other modules, start from scratch, or put it on a CD? With a little bit of knowledge about how CPAN works you can easily make your own archive that works with the standard CPAN tools. Want to go home with your own copy of CPAN? Bring a 1 G thumb drive and we'll make you a copy as you wait. brian will also be bringing a big pile of random books with him. That pile includes several recent promotional copies as well as things he doesn't want on his shelf anymore. Why not bring your unwanted books, too? We'll have a book swap. Give a book, take a book. And, for those that want first crack at the books, give a lightning talk. You don't need slides or anything fancy. Just get up and talk for 3 to 5 minutes about something you're doing with Perl or that happened in your Perl development since the last meeting. It's a great way to get used to talking about a technical topic in front of a friendly audience. brian will give everyone who gives a lightning talk a free copy of the current issue of The Perl Review, which currently has a long article on his talk topic. Don't forget that everyone is invited to Monks for drinks and food after the meeting. Anyone who shows up at Monks for their first time gets a free drink on brian. :) As with all Chicago Perl Mongers meetings, everyone is welcome, whether or not you consider yourself a member. We look forward to seeing you there! Questions about this meeting? Ask on the chicago-talk at pm.org mailing list, or send email to andy at petdance dot com. You can also see a list of past and upcoming meetings at http://chicago.pm.org/meetings/. From frag at ripco.com Mon Oct 22 08:24:20 2007 From: frag at ripco.com (Mike Fragassi) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:24:20 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters In-Reply-To: <86182.62961.qm@web58706.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <86182.62961.qm@web58706.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Try Text::ParseWords. You'll need to use something like: my @words = "ewords(',', undef, $line); -- Mike F. On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, tiger peng wrote: > > Hello, > > There must be better way for removing the double quote in a CSV file > optionally quoted by double quote. What I did as below is ugly and not > reliable. Could anyone provide one beautify line? From andy at petdance.com Mon Oct 22 08:24:27 2007 From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:24:27 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters In-Reply-To: <86182.62961.qm@web58706.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <86182.62961.qm@web58706.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20071022152427.GA24850@petdance.com> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:52:33AM -0700, tiger peng (tigerpeng2001 at yahoo.com) wrote: > There must be better way for removing the double quote in a CSV file optionally quoted by double quote. > What I did as below is ugly and not reliable. Could anyone provide one beautify line? > > $delimiter=chr(0227); > s/^"/$delimiter/g; > s/,"/,$delimiter/g; > s/"$/$delimiter/g; > s/",/$delimiter,/g; > s/"//g; > s/$delimiter/"/g; Why are you trying to remove the double quotes? Is the format wrong? I would probably read in your CSV file with Text::CSV_XS and re-output it with different parameters. -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance From frag at ripco.com Mon Oct 22 08:26:45 2007 From: frag at ripco.com (Mike Fragassi) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:26:45 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [Chicago-talk] use.perl.org - unreadable? In-Reply-To: <647841.90435.qm@web801.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <647841.90435.qm@web801.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Jason L. Froebe wrote: > Works fine here: Firefox 2.0.0.8 with noscript 1.1.7.2 on Vista > business. > > Does clearing the cache help? No, it doesn't. -- Mike F. From shlomif at iglu.org.il Mon Oct 22 08:27:11 2007 From: shlomif at iglu.org.il (Shlomi Fish) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:27:11 +0200 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters In-Reply-To: <86182.62961.qm@web58706.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <86182.62961.qm@web58706.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <200710221727.11518.shlomif@iglu.org.il> On Monday 22 October 2007, tiger peng wrote: > Hello, > > There must be better way for removing the double quote in a CSV file > optionally quoted by double quote. What I did as below is ugly and not > reliable. Could anyone provide one beautify line? > > $delimiter=chr(0227); > s/^"/$delimiter/g; > s/,"/,$delimiter/g; > s/"$/$delimiter/g; > s/",/$delimiter,/g; > s/"//g; > s/$delimiter/"/g; Is there any reason you're not using Text::CSV_XS to parse the CSV? http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-CSV_XS/ Otherwise, you may wish to process the line incrementally using \G and /g. Regards, Shlomi Fish --------------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish shlomif at iglu.org.il Homepage: http://www.shlomifish.org/ If it's not in my E-mail it doesn't happen. And if my E-mail is saying one thing, and everything else says something else - E-mail will conquer. -- An Israeli Linuxer From tzz at lifelogs.com Mon Oct 22 08:29:39 2007 From: tzz at lifelogs.com (Ted Zlatanov) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:29:39 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters In-Reply-To: <86182.62961.qm@web58706.mail.re1.yahoo.com> (tiger peng's message of "Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:52:33 -0700 (PDT)") References: <86182.62961.qm@web58706.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:52:33 -0700 (PDT) tiger peng wrote: tp> There must be better way for removing the double quote in a CSV file optionally quoted by double quote. tp> What I did as below is ugly and not reliable. Could anyone provide one beautify line? tp> $delimiter=chr(0227); tp> s/^"/$delimiter/g; tp> s/,"/,$delimiter/g; tp> s/"$/$delimiter/g; tp> s/",/$delimiter,/g; tp> s/"//g; tp> s/$delimiter/"/g; Have you considered Text::CSV_XS or any other CSV parsing modules? You could just say $columns = $csv->getline($io); # you need an IO object You can then use $columns, which is an array ref, any way you like. Ted From jon at jrock.us Mon Oct 22 08:32:19 2007 From: jon at jrock.us (Jonathan Rockway) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] October 23, 2007: Make Your Own CPAN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <471CC283.1000105@jrock.us> Pete Krawczyk wrote: > And, for those that want first crack at the books, give a lightning talk. > You don't need slides or anything fancy. Just get up and talk for 3 to 5 > minutes about something you're doing with Perl or that happened in your > Perl development since the last meeting. It's a great way to get used to > talking about a technical topic in front of a friendly audience. brian > will give everyone who gives a lightning talk a free copy of the current > issue of The Perl Review, which currently has a long article on his talk > topic. I would like to give my 15 minutes "Test More" talk. Regards, Jonathan Rockway -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 370 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071022/c489d186/attachment.bin From jon at jrock.us Mon Oct 22 08:35:40 2007 From: jon at jrock.us (Jonathan Rockway) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] use.perl.org - unreadable? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <471CC34C.3080204@jrock.us> Mike Fragassi wrote: > Am I the only one out there who can't read the new javascript comments > in use.perl.org? (Firefox 2.0.0.8 Win Xp with noscript 1.1.7.2 > permiting perl.org javascript.) > You can disable the new interface by going to your preferences: http://use.perl.org/users.pl?op=editcomm And changing the Discussion Style checkbox from D2 to classic. Regards, Jonathan Rockway -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 370 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071022/0f6e16d2/attachment.bin From a.wong2.nu at gmail.com Mon Oct 22 09:37:52 2007 From: a.wong2.nu at gmail.com (Tony Wong) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] October 23, 2007: Make Your Own CPAN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <334a3ab20710220937r6885ebfdy45dfc00183a7967a@mail.gmail.com> Hi Pete, Thanks for sending out the notice. Would you mind putting my name down on the list for check-in? I'll look through my books and see what I've got to bring tomorrow night. Tony On 10/22/07, Pete Krawczyk wrote: > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Chicago Perl Mongers Meeting Announcement > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Topic: Make Your Own CPAN > Presenter: brian d foy > Date/Time: Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007, 7:00 PM > Location: Performics, 12th Floor, 180 N. LaSalle, Chicago, IL > RSVP: By noon on Oct. 23rd to "pkrawczyk" with "doubleclick.com" > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Want your own CPAN? Need to add your own modules, take out other modules, > start from scratch, or put it on a CD? With a little bit of knowledge > about how CPAN works you can easily make your own archive that works with > the standard CPAN tools. Want to go home with your own copy of CPAN? Bring > a 1 G thumb drive and we'll make you a copy as you wait. > > brian will also be bringing a big pile of random books with him. That pile > includes several recent promotional copies as well as things he doesn't > want on his shelf anymore. Why not bring your unwanted books, too? We'll > have a book swap. Give a book, take a book. > > And, for those that want first crack at the books, give a lightning talk. > You don't need slides or anything fancy. Just get up and talk for 3 to 5 > minutes about something you're doing with Perl or that happened in your > Perl development since the last meeting. It's a great way to get used to > talking about a technical topic in front of a friendly audience. brian > will give everyone who gives a lightning talk a free copy of the current > issue of The Perl Review, which currently has a long article on his talk > topic. > > Don't forget that everyone is invited to Monks for drinks and food > after the meeting. Anyone who shows up at Monks for their first time > gets a free drink on brian. :) > > > > As with all Chicago Perl Mongers meetings, everyone is welcome, > whether or not you consider yourself a member. We look forward to > seeing you there! > > Questions about this meeting? Ask on the chicago-talk at pm.org mailing > list, or send email to andy at petdance dot com. You can also see a list > of past and upcoming meetings at http://chicago.pm.org/meetings/. > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > From frag at ripco.com Mon Oct 22 09:49:21 2007 From: frag at ripco.com (Mike Fragassi) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:49:21 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [Chicago-talk] use.perl.org - unreadable? In-Reply-To: <471CC34C.3080204@jrock.us> References: <471CC34C.3080204@jrock.us> Message-ID: On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > You can disable the new interface by going to your preferences: > > http://use.perl.org/users.pl?op=editcomm > > And changing the Discussion Style checkbox from D2 to classic. Meh; why should I log in just to browse? (Especially when logging in means seeing the ridiculous emoti-face icons on each entry. I can't tell from the preference page whether there's a way to hide them completely, but man o man I hate those.) In any case, if this isn't just me with the problem, I want to see what can be done to get it fixed; I'm assuming that this is indeed a bug, and not a feature. I've figured out via the FAQ that since the site is updated weekly with the latest slashcode, that the sourceforge tracker for slashcode must be the proper place for bug reports. I'll have to give that a shot later on when I have time. -- Mike F. From chicago.pm at galumph.com Mon Oct 22 10:05:45 2007 From: chicago.pm at galumph.com (Elliot Shank) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:05:45 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] use.perl.org - unreadable? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <471CD869.6080803@galumph.com> Mike Fragassi wrote: > Am I the only one out there who can't read the new javascript comments > in use.perl.org? (Firefox 2.0.0.8 Win Xp with noscript 1.1.7.2 > permiting perl.org javascript.) Fx 2.0.0.8 Mac, no js blocking software at all: borked. From list at phaedrusdeinus.org Mon Oct 22 11:19:04 2007 From: list at phaedrusdeinus.org (John Melesky) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Frozen Perl Message-ID: <240953B3-2A3D-4288-9F79-D9CD5DBB6376@phaedrusdeinus.org> Everyone, Many of you have been to the Pittsburgh Perl Workshop. There's something similar happening up in Minneapolis in February. It's called Frozen Perl. http://www.frozen-perl.org/mpw2008/ The call for speakers is almost closed (tomorrow's it), and they need some more presentations. This year's theme is "Perl in Practice". http://www.frozen-perl.org/mpw2008/cfs.html Despite the fact that Minnesota's winters are worse than Chicago's, this promises to be (indoor and heated) fun. If you've never given a presentation before, this is a good place to start. If you have given presentations before, dust one off and submit it. That is all. -johnnnnnnnn From lembark at wrkhors.com Wed Oct 24 12:14:48 2007 From: lembark at wrkhors.com (Steven Lembark) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters In-Reply-To: <86182.62961.qm@web58706.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <86182.62961.qm@web58706.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <471F99A8.3030301@wrkhors.com> > There must be better way for removing the double quote in a CSV file > optionally quoted by double quote. > What I did as below is ugly and not reliable. Could anyone provide one > beautify line? > > $delimiter=chr(0227); > s/^"/$delimiter/g; > s/,"/,$delimiter/g; > s/"$/$delimiter/g; > s/",/$delimiter,/g; > s/"//g; > s/$delimiter/"/g; You don't seem to want all of the quotes removed, only the embedded ones. If the data is well-formatted then the operation above will leave you with a bunch of naked backslashes in the text: "this is a \"double quoted\" text line" becomes "this is a \double quoted\ text line" and you probably don't want the \d or \ in your result. If the real problem is that fate has handed you some CSV data with embedded, un-escaped quotes then your approach makes the most sense, but you'll have to remove escaped quotes also: s{ \\" }{}gx; will strip the \" char's. You might prefer to replace them with non-delimiting quotes, e.g., s{ \\" }{'}gx; All of the CSV parsing modules assume "clean" CSV source (oxymoron?) so if you need to clean up botched data then some iterative approach is likely to be what you need. enjoi -- Steven Lembark 85-09 90th Street Workhorse Computing Woodhaven, NY 11421 lembark at wrkhors.com +1 888 359 3508 From tigerpeng2001 at yahoo.com Wed Oct 24 12:54:38 2007 From: tigerpeng2001 at yahoo.com (tiger peng) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:54:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters Message-ID: <90912.45436.qm@web58705.mail.re1.yahoo.com> You are right if it is well formated CSV file. But I don't know if this is guaranteed. There is no document about it. I just rewrite an old old uncommented/undocumented working scripts. The segment is just rewritten to make it little bit easier to read by replacing the embedded 'DEL' charters with a variable populate with function chr. Below is the best I can do. It looks better to me and can run as two times faster than the old one does. I still cannot make out one-liner for it. Can anyone get ride of the first line? my $leadingQ=""; $leadingQ='"' if /^"/; #save the leading quote if it is there s/(? To: Chicago.pm chatter Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 2:14:48 PM Subject: Re: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters > There must be better way for removing the double quote in a CSV file > optionally quoted by double quote. > What I did as below is ugly and not reliable. Could anyone provide one > beautify line? > > $delimiter=chr(0227); > s/^"/$delimiter/g; > s/,"/,$delimiter/g; > s/"$/$delimiter/g; > s/",/$delimiter,/g; > s/"//g; > s/$delimiter/"/g; You don't seem to want all of the quotes removed, only the embedded ones. If the data is well-formatted then the operation above will leave you with a bunch of naked backslashes in the text: "this is a \"double quoted\" text line" becomes "this is a \double quoted\ text line" and you probably don't want the \d or \ in your result. If the real problem is that fate has handed you some CSV data with embedded, un-escaped quotes then your approach makes the most sense, but you'll have to remove escaped quotes also: s{ \\" }{}gx; will strip the \" char's. You might prefer to replace them with non-delimiting quotes, e.g., s{ \\" }{'}gx; All of the CSV parsing modules assume "clean" CSV source (oxymoron?) so if you need to clean up botched data then some iterative approach is likely to be what you need. enjoi -- Steven Lembark 85-09 90th Street Workhorse Computing Woodhaven, NY 11421 lembark at wrkhors.com +1 888 359 3508 _______________________________________________ Chicago-talk mailing list Chicago-talk at pm.org http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071024/d544868d/attachment.html From lembark at wrkhors.com Wed Oct 24 17:03:05 2007 From: lembark at wrkhors.com (Steven Lembark) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters In-Reply-To: <90912.45436.qm@web58705.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <90912.45436.qm@web58705.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <471FDD39.3060201@wrkhors.com> > You are right if it is well formated CSV file. > But I don't know if this is guaranteed. There is no document about it. I > just rewrite an old old uncommented/undocumented working scripts. > > The segment is just rewritten to make it little bit easier to read by > replacing the embedded 'DEL' charters with a variable populate with > function chr. > > Below is the best I can do. It looks better to me and can run as two > times faster than the old one does. I still cannot make out one-liner > for it. Can anyone get ride of the first line? > > my $leadingQ=""; $leadingQ='"' if /^"/; #save the leading quote if it > is there > s/(? at the end of the line > print OUTF $leadingQ, $_; That's what I was going to suggest. You might want to eyeball Text::Balanced (Conway) and Regexp::Common::balanced (abagail). T::B allows you to validate the content, which might be the best approach: work your way in from the edges and discard what's in the middle of balanced quotes. -- Steven Lembark 85-09 90th Street Workhorse Computing Woodhaven, NY 11421 lembark at wrkhors.com +1 888 359 3508 From briank at kappacs.com Wed Oct 24 18:33:11 2007 From: briank at kappacs.com (Brian Katzung) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters In-Reply-To: <90912.45436.qm@web58705.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <90912.45436.qm@web58705.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <471FF257.8010306@kappacs.com> tiger peng wrote: > You are right if it is well formated CSV file. > But I don't know if this is guaranteed. There is no document about it. I > just rewrite an old old uncommented/undocumented working scripts. > > The segment is just rewritten to make it little bit easier to read by > replacing the embedded 'DEL' charters with a variable populate with > function chr. > > Below is the best I can do. It looks better to me and can run as two > times faster than the old one does. I still cannot make out one-liner > for it. Can anyone get ride of the first line? > > my $leadingQ=""; $leadingQ='"' if /^"/; #save the leading quote if it > is there > s/(? at the end of the line > print OUTF $leadingQ, $_; OK. Here's my one-liner version (well, two including the print) of the above: s/(? ----- Original Message ---- > From: Steven Lembark > To: Chicago.pm chatter > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 2:14:48 PM > Subject: Re: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters > > > There must be better way for removing the double quote in a CSV file > > optionally quoted by double quote. > > What I did as below is ugly and not reliable. Could anyone provide one > > beautify line? > > > > $delimiter=chr(0227); > > s/^"/$delimiter/g; > > s/,"/,$delimiter/g; > > s/"$/$delimiter/g; > > s/",/$delimiter,/g; > > s/"//g; > > s/$delimiter/"/g; > > You don't seem to want all of the quotes removed, > only the embedded ones. If the data is well-formatted > then the operation above will leave you with a bunch > of naked backslashes in the text: > > "this is a \"double quoted\" text line" > > becomes > > "this is a \double quoted\ text line" > > and you probably don't want the \d or \ in your > result. > > If the real problem is that fate has handed you some > CSV data with embedded, un-escaped quotes then your > approach makes the most sense, but you'll have to > remove escaped quotes also: > > s{ \\" }{}gx; > > will strip the \" char's. You might prefer to replace > them with non-delimiting quotes, e.g., > > > s{ \\" }{'}gx; > > All of the CSV parsing modules assume "clean" CSV > source (oxymoron?) so if you need to clean up botched > data then some iterative approach is likely to be > what you need. > > enjoi > > -- > Steven Lembark 85-09 90th Street Here's a "smarter" but longer obfuscation: s{((?:^|,)")((?:[^"]|\\"|"")*?)(")(?=,|$)|([^,]*)}{ (sub { my @a = @_; $a[1] =~ s/\\"|"//g; join('', grep(defined, @a)); })-> ($1, defined($2)? $2: $4, $3)}eg; print; You're certainly at liberty to remove newlines from the code if the line count is that important to you. :-) This one considers a field to be quoted only if it has (anchored) quotes at each end and internal quotes are \-escaped or doubled. All other \" and " that are not anchored in a quoted field are removed. I haven't attempted any timings. - Brian -- Brian Katzung, Kappa Computer Solutions, LLC Leveraging UNIX, Linux, open source, and custom software solutions for business and beyond Phone: 877.367.8837 x1 http://www.kappacs.com From tigerpeng2001 at yahoo.com Wed Oct 24 20:22:22 2007 From: tigerpeng2001 at yahoo.com (tiger peng) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:22:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters Message-ID: <525492.83241.qm@web58709.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Thanks everyone. Here is the one-liner I am looking for! perl -ne 's/(? out.csv (-; I have not used my real first name 'Ge' for regex for a while ;-) I believe the replace character and the delimiter can be a set of character, such as ["'] [,:|]. Another question: How to use one-liner to split web log file? ----- Original Message ---- From: Brian Katzung To: Chicago.pm chatter Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 8:33:11 PM Subject: Re: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters tiger peng wrote: > You are right if it is well formated CSV file. > But I don't know if this is guaranteed. There is no document about it. I > just rewrite an old old uncommented/undocumented working scripts. > > The segment is just rewritten to make it little bit easier to read by > replacing the embedded 'DEL' charters with a variable populate with > function chr. > > Below is the best I can do. It looks better to me and can run as two > times faster than the old one does. I still cannot make out one-liner > for it. Can anyone get ride of the first line? > > my $leadingQ=""; $leadingQ='"' if /^"/; #save the leading quote if it > is there > s/(? at the end of the line > print OUTF $leadingQ, $_; OK. Here's my one-liner version (well, two including the print) of the above: s/(? ----- Original Message ---- > From: Steven Lembark > To: Chicago.pm chatter > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 2:14:48 PM > Subject: Re: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters > > > There must be better way for removing the double quote in a CSV file > > optionally quoted by double quote. > > What I did as below is ugly and not reliable. Could anyone provide one > > beautify line? > > > > $delimiter=chr(0227); > > s/^"/$delimiter/g; > > s/,"/,$delimiter/g; > > s/"$/$delimiter/g; > > s/",/$delimiter,/g; > > s/"//g; > > s/$delimiter/"/g; > > You don't seem to want all of the quotes removed, > only the embedded ones. If the data is well-formatted > then the operation above will leave you with a bunch > of naked backslashes in the text: > > "this is a \"double quoted\" text line" > > becomes > > "this is a \double quoted\ text line" > > and you probably don't want the \d or \ in your > result. > > If the real problem is that fate has handed you some > CSV data with embedded, un-escaped quotes then your > approach makes the most sense, but you'll have to > remove escaped quotes also: > > s{ \\" }{}gx; > > will strip the \" char's. You might prefer to replace > them with non-delimiting quotes, e.g., > > > s{ \\" }{'}gx; > > All of the CSV parsing modules assume "clean" CSV > source (oxymoron?) so if you need to clean up botched > data then some iterative approach is likely to be > what you need. > > enjoi > > -- > Steven Lembark 85-09 90th Street Here's a "smarter" but longer obfuscation: s{((?:^|,)")((?:[^"]|\\"|"")*?)(")(?=,|$)|([^,]*)}{ (sub { my @a = @_; $a[1] =~ s/\\"|"//g; join('', grep(defined, @a)); })-> ($1, defined($2)? $2: $4, $3)}eg; print; You're certainly at liberty to remove newlines from the code if the line count is that important to you. :-) This one considers a field to be quoted only if it has (anchored) quotes at each end and internal quotes are \-escaped or doubled. All other \" and " that are not anchored in a quoted field are removed. I haven't attempted any timings. - Brian -- Brian Katzung, Kappa Computer Solutions, LLC Leveraging UNIX, Linux, open source, and custom software solutions for business and beyond Phone: 877.367.8837 x1 http://www.kappacs.com _______________________________________________ Chicago-talk mailing list Chicago-talk at pm.org http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071024/6b3bb8c4/attachment-0001.html From tigerpeng2001 at yahoo.com Wed Oct 24 21:00:17 2007 From: tigerpeng2001 at yahoo.com (tiger peng) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:00:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters Message-ID: <549072.55955.qm@web58713.mail.re1.yahoo.com> And this one will keep the double quote escape by backslash \". But if a backslash is escaped by a backslash, the double quote following the escaped backslash, this double quote is not escaped, will still be kept. Phew ;-& 's/(? To: Chicago.pm chatter Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:22:22 PM Subject: Re: [Chicago-talk] Removing Characters Thanks everyone. Here is the one-liner I am looking for! perl -ne 's/(? out.csv (-; I have not used my real first name 'Ge' for regex for a while ;-) I believe the replace character and the delimiter can be a set of character, such as ["'] [,:|]. 's/(? References: <549072.55955.qm@web58713.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4720C40E.70008@wrkhors.com> > And this one will keep the double quote escape by backslash \". But if a > backslash is escaped by a backslash, the double quote following the > escaped backslash, this double quote is not escaped, will still be kept. > > Phew ;-& > > 's/(? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Chicago Perl Mongers Meeting Announcements ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Date/Time: Tuesday, November 13th, 2007, 7:00 PM Location: IIT-Rice Campus, 201 East Loop Rd, Wheaton, IL Afterward: Dinner at CozyMel's ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Date/Time: Tuesday, November 27th, 2007, 7:00 PM Location: Performics, 12th Floor, 180 N. LaSalle, Chicago, IL RSVP: By noon on Nov. 27th to "pkrawczyk" with "doubleclick.com" ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- This is a consolidated November announcement for both the city and Wheaton meetings. There is no speaker information in this announcement, because we have no volunteers to speak at either meeting. Perl Mongers groups rely on members to provide the content to these meetings, and so far, no one has heeded the call to speak in November. We have only had 9 different people present at 19 meetings so far this year. We'd like to hear what you're doing with Perl! Even if you don't think you need two whole hours, we would still like to see new faces with new content. If we can't come up with content for these meetings, they will likely be cancelled. To avoid that, speak up today! In case you're wondering, 2007's speaker list reads as follows: Jan Wheaton: Andy Lester, Josh McAdams, Pete Krawczyk Jan Chicago: Jon Rockway Feb W: CANCELLED due to weather Feb C: Chris McAvoy Mar W: Chris McAvoy Mar C: Jon Rockway Apr W: Andy Lester, Pete Krawczyk Apr C: Andy Lester, Pete Krawczyk May C: Various (cancellation) May W: Clyde Forrester Jun W: Andy Lester Jun C: Clyde Forrester, Ryan Gerry Jul W: Andy Lester Jul C: Various (lightning talks) Aug W: Kent Cowgill Aug C: Josh McAdams Sep W: Andy Lester Sep C: Kent Cowgill Oct W: Andy Lester (lightning talks) Oct C: brian d foy As with all Chicago Perl Mongers meetings, everyone is welcome, whether or not you consider yourself a member. We look forward to seeing you there! Questions about this meeting? Ask on the chicago-talk at pm.org mailing list, or send email to andy at petdance dot com. You can also see a list of past and upcoming meetings at http://chicago.pm.org/meetings/. (And thanks to Pete Krawczyk for writing this. I'm just mailing it out.) xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance From andy at petdance.com Fri Oct 26 08:25:20 2007 From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Suburban meetings need a new organizer Message-ID: <00B2C94E-F034-4AD4-81B4-8C964825F892@petdance.com> I'm stepping aside as organizer of the suburban Chicago.PM and Uniforum meetings. If meetings are to continue out in the suburbs, someone needs to step forward and take over the responsibility of organizing them, either getting people to speak, or figuring out what will happen during the meeting. What you choose to do with the mantle of organizer is up to you. There's no "supposed to" or "have to". This is open source, and it works with meetings just like software. Whatever someone does is what happens. We have a space at IIT in Wheaton on the 2nd Tuesday of each month, although that could probably get changed by working with the Uniforum people. I'll say it again: Whatever someone does to make meetings happens is what will happen for meetings. YOU can make the meetings be exactly what you want. You wanna have 'em at the bar down the street from your house? Then take the meeting organizer hat and make it happen. If you want to have panel discussions about how Perl can be used best for figuring out lotto numbers, then by all means, do it. Messages about "Wheaton sucks, we should move the meeting to X" or "We should have X at our meetings" are not helpful unless YOU are the one who is going to make X happen. Without YOU taking some sort of action to make it happen, you're really saying "I want you to do X for me," and that's not helpful, and is frustrating at best. I will help however I can. If you're at all interested, even if only in helping a bit, please let me know. Thanks, xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance From brian.d.foy at gmail.com Fri Oct 26 11:27:16 2007 From: brian.d.foy at gmail.com (brian d foy) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] November's meeting announcements In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2715accf0710261127h330baa22v98e2b9075f20c91c@mail.gmail.com> On 10/25/07, Andy Lester wrote: > We have only had 9 different people present at 19 meetings so far > this year. I think that's doing pretty well, especially since some of the talks were repeated for each group. Just out of the talent in the Chicago area we filled up the year without having a lot of visiting speakers. And, nine people is a bit low since it doesn't count the lightning talks. It takes awhile to build up to being able to give a long talk, so I don't discount the shorter talks. Other groups would feel lucky to have half the activity. So, congratulations everyone. We rock :) -- brian d foy http://www.pair.com/~comdog/ From jon at jrock.us Tue Oct 30 10:30:25 2007 From: jon at jrock.us (Jonathan Rockway) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] exciting perl events in chicago this december Message-ID: <47276A31.5020103@jrock.us> Hi all, Two things. First, Stonehenge is doing a few low-cost open-enrollment Perl courses this December downtown. Anyone is welcome to enroll. The schedule is as follows: Day courses, 8am to 4pm --------------- Learning Perl, Dec 10-12, $750/person Intermediate Perl, Dec 13-15, $500/person Night courses, 6pm to 9pm --------------- Catalyst, Dec 10-12, $375/person Test Driven Development, Dec 13-14, $250/person Learning Perl and Intermediate Perl will be taught by brian d foy, Test Driven Development will be taught by Josh McAdams, and I will be teaching the Catalyst course. If you're interested in any of the courses, please contact brian to register (brian.d.foy AT gmail.com). Questions are also welcome :) Secondly, WindyCity.pm is sponsoring a hackathon on the weekend of December 14-16 (all day Fri-Sun). It's open-ended, so bring whatever project you want to work on and get some other people to help you out! It's a great way to spend some quality time with both your favorite perl projects and your fellow perl mongers :) The event is of course free, and it will be on the second floor of the J.Ira & Nicki Harris Family Hostel (http://www.hichicago.org/). Food will be provided :) Finally, if you're coming in from out of town, we've reserved rooms at the hostel for something like $31/night (Thursday-Sunday) Contact me for details. Please e-mail me directly if you plan on attending or if you have any questions. I look forward to seeing you all there! Regards, Jonathan Rockway -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 370 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071030/2dce7efc/attachment.bin From chicago.pm at galumph.com Tue Oct 30 11:38:46 2007 From: chicago.pm at galumph.com (Elliot Shank) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:38:46 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] exciting perl events in chicago this december In-Reply-To: <47276A31.5020103@jrock.us> References: <47276A31.5020103@jrock.us> Message-ID: <47277A36.1050408@galumph.com> Jonathan Rockway wrote: > Secondly, WindyCity.pm is sponsoring a hackathon on the weekend of > December 14-16 (all day Fri-Sun). It's open-ended, so bring whatever > project you want to work on and get some other people to help you out! > It's a great way to spend some quality time with both your favorite perl > projects and your fellow perl mongers :) Is this going to get more widely publicized than here? From kent at c2group.net Tue Oct 30 11:48:58 2007 From: kent at c2group.net (Kent Cowgill) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:48:58 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] exciting perl events in chicago this december In-Reply-To: <47277A36.1050408@galumph.com> References: <47276A31.5020103@jrock.us> <47277A36.1050408@galumph.com> Message-ID: Yeah - it was on use.perl.org yesterday. -Kent Cowgill C2 Group, Inc. kent at c2group.net http://www.c2group.net 312.804.0160 On Oct 30, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Elliot Shank wrote: > Jonathan Rockway wrote: >> Secondly, WindyCity.pm is sponsoring a hackathon on the weekend of >> December 14-16 (all day Fri-Sun). It's open-ended, so bring whatever >> project you want to work on and get some other people to help you >> out! >> It's a great way to spend some quality time with both your >> favorite perl >> projects and your fellow perl mongers :) > > Is this going to get more widely publicized than here? > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > From kent at c2group.net Wed Oct 31 09:02:52 2007 From: kent at c2group.net (Kent Cowgill) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? Message-ID: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> Hello, I'm working up a talk, and if there's any interest, I'll be happy to finish it up in time for either (or both) of the meetings for November. The current title is "Simple Photo Processing and Web Display with Perl". I'll touch on a few modules: Imager, MIME::Lite, Email::MIME::Attachment::Stripper, and Image::ExifTool. -Kent Cowgill C2 Group, Inc. kent at c2group.net http://www.c2group.net 312.804.0160 From jon at jrock.us Wed Oct 31 09:05:02 2007 From: jon at jrock.us (Jonathan Rockway) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:05:02 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> Message-ID: <4728A7AE.6040502@jrock.us> Kent Cowgill wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working up a talk, and if there's any interest, I'll be happy to > finish it up in time for either (or both) of the meetings for November. > > The current title is "Simple Photo Processing and Web Display with > Perl". > > I'll touch on a few modules: Imager, MIME::Lite, > Email::MIME::Attachment::Stripper, and Image::ExifTool. > > Sounds cool; I'm looking forward to hearing this. I said last time I would do my "Test More" talk, and the offer still stands. It's only about 15 minutes, so maybe we can do both of these talks next time? Regards, Jonathan Rockway -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 370 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071031/bbd4b928/attachment.bin From andy at petdance.com Wed Oct 31 09:10:19 2007 From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> Message-ID: <6A9057BB-1370-4130-93F0-77C0733B74B6@petdance.com> On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:02 AM, Kent Cowgill wrote: > The current title is "Simple Photo Processing and Web Display with > Perl". > > I'll touch on a few modules: Imager, MIME::Lite, > Email::MIME::Attachment::Stripper, and Image::ExifTool. ' That would be great, Kent. Can I put you down for the 13th? -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance From kent at c2group.net Wed Oct 31 09:10:42 2007 From: kent at c2group.net (Kent Cowgill) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: <4728A7AE.6040502@jrock.us> References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> <4728A7AE.6040502@jrock.us> Message-ID: <8FF8F342-E9A6-463E-860A-96C147949903@c2group.net> (Adding the other list, too) Yeah, that's a good idea, since my talk most likely won't be able to fill up the available time. -Kent Cowgill C2 Group, Inc. kent at c2group.net http://www.c2group.net 312.804.0160 On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > Kent Cowgill wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm working up a talk, and if there's any interest, I'll be happy to >> finish it up in time for either (or both) of the meetings for >> November. >> >> The current title is "Simple Photo Processing and Web Display with >> Perl". >> >> I'll touch on a few modules: Imager, MIME::Lite, >> Email::MIME::Attachment::Stripper, and Image::ExifTool. >> >> > > Sounds cool; I'm looking forward to hearing this. > > I said last time I would do my "Test More" talk, and the offer still > stands. It's only about 15 minutes, so maybe we can do both of these > talks next time? > > Regards, > Jonathan Rockway > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk From mrnicksgirl at gmail.com Wed Oct 31 09:12:44 2007 From: mrnicksgirl at gmail.com (Nola Stowe) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:12:44 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> Message-ID: <43e95380710310912u2589c89aqe7b3292cbb6788c0@mail.gmail.com> I had an idea for the downtown meeting.. Everyone pitches in in 5-10 bucks and we order food, and watch an episode or two of IT Crowd. We could do a short talk and then one episode instead. We could do this in december.... maybe having it earlier in the month to avoid the holiday rush... *if* moving the meeting won't cause problems. anyways.. just some ideas. On 10/31/07, Kent Cowgill wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm working up a talk, and if there's any interest, I'll be happy to > finish it up in time for either (or both) of the meetings for November. > > The current title is "Simple Photo Processing and Web Display with > Perl". > > I'll touch on a few modules: Imager, MIME::Lite, > Email::MIME::Attachment::Stripper, and Image::ExifTool. > > -Kent Cowgill > > C2 Group, Inc. > kent at c2group.net > http://www.c2group.net > 312.804.0160 > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > -- http://rubygeek.com - my blog featuring: Ruby, PHP and Perl http://DevChix.com - boys can't have all the fun From jon at jrock.us Wed Oct 31 09:23:09 2007 From: jon at jrock.us (Jonathan Rockway) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:23:09 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: <43e95380710310912u2589c89aqe7b3292cbb6788c0@mail.gmail.com> References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> <43e95380710310912u2589c89aqe7b3292cbb6788c0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <4728ABED.8050406@jrock.us> Nola Stowe wrote: > I had an idea for the downtown meeting.. > > Everyone pitches in in 5-10 bucks and we order food, and watch an > episode or two of IT Crowd. > > We could do a short talk and then one episode instead. > > We could do this in december.... maybe having it earlier in the month > to avoid the holiday rush... *if* moving the meeting won't cause > problems. > > anyways.. just some ideas. > Or we could do this a week or two earlier and just call it a "social event" instead of a meeting. (more downtown events)++ (The IT Crowd)++ BTW, is it even "legal" to watch The IT Crowd in the US? The only DVDs I can find are region 2, and it's apparently a DMCA violation to circumvent the region code. FWIW, I just downloaded the episodes from Usenet ;) Regards, Jonathan Rockway -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 370 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071031/fd75cfd2/attachment.bin From andy at petdance.com Wed Oct 31 09:29:46 2007 From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:29:46 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: <4728ABED.8050406@jrock.us> References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> <43e95380710310912u2589c89aqe7b3292cbb6788c0@mail.gmail.com> <4728ABED.8050406@jrock.us> Message-ID: On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > Or we could do this a week or two earlier and just call it a "social > event" instead of a meeting. > > (more downtown events)++ Please make up your mind about this division of groups. If you're going to have WindyCity.pm be "downtown only", then keep the downtown- only discussion on the WindyCity.pm list. Or, let's merge the two lists back together as they were. But you can't have it both ways. Thanks, Andy -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance From kent at c2group.net Wed Oct 31 09:39:52 2007 From: kent at c2group.net (Kent Cowgill) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: <6A9057BB-1370-4130-93F0-77C0733B74B6@petdance.com> References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> <6A9057BB-1370-4130-93F0-77C0733B74B6@petdance.com> Message-ID: Absolutely. -Kent Cowgill C2 Group, Inc. kent at c2group.net http://www.c2group.net 312.804.0160 On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:10 AM, Andy Lester wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:02 AM, Kent Cowgill wrote: > >> The current title is "Simple Photo Processing and Web Display with >> Perl". >> >> I'll touch on a few modules: Imager, MIME::Lite, >> Email::MIME::Attachment::Stripper, and Image::ExifTool. > ' > That would be great, Kent. Can I put you down for the 13th? > > -- > Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > From jon at jrock.us Wed Oct 31 09:40:40 2007 From: jon at jrock.us (Jonathan Rockway) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:40:40 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> <43e95380710310912u2589c89aqe7b3292cbb6788c0@mail.gmail.com> <4728ABED.8050406@jrock.us> Message-ID: <4728B008.6050105@jrock.us> Andy Lester wrote: > Please make up your mind about this division of groups. If you're > going to have WindyCity.pm be "downtown only", then keep the downtown- > only discussion on the WindyCity.pm list. Or, let's merge the two > lists back together as they were. Everyone is invited to the downtown events. > But you can't have it both ways. > Why not? Regards, Jonathan Rockway -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 370 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071031/b7e210d9/attachment.bin From andy at petdance.com Wed Oct 31 09:44:45 2007 From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:44:45 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: <4728B008.6050105@jrock.us> References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> <43e95380710310912u2589c89aqe7b3292cbb6788c0@mail.gmail.com> <4728ABED.8050406@jrock.us> <4728B008.6050105@jrock.us> Message-ID: > >> But you can't have it both ways. >> > Why not? Because if you're going to be exclusive about being in your own little world, I (and others) don't want to hear about it. If the non-city folks are going to be excluded, then go exclude yourselves, but do it off of this list. Nobody needs to monitor two lists. Either combine the two lists, or stay off this one. Andy -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance From jon at jrock.us Wed Oct 31 09:52:14 2007 From: jon at jrock.us (Jonathan Rockway) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:52:14 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> <43e95380710310912u2589c89aqe7b3292cbb6788c0@mail.gmail.com> <4728ABED.8050406@jrock.us> <4728B008.6050105@jrock.us> Message-ID: <4728B2BE.2090706@jrock.us> Andy Lester wrote: > Because if you're going to be exclusive about being in your own little > world, I (and others) don't want to hear about it. If the non-city > folks are going to be excluded, then go exclude yourselves, but do it > off of this list. > How are we excluding anyone? We are not trying to. I personally welcome you to attend the planned IT Crowd screening :) Anyway, the reason the discussion happened on this list is because Nola happened to have the idea while replying to a message on this list. It's a good idea, and exchanging ideas on the "wrong" list is definitely better than not exchanging them at all. I highly doubt that anyone really cares which list is which, except you. > Either combine the two lists, or stay off this one. > Or what? Regards, Jonathan Rockway -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 370 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/chicago-talk/attachments/20071031/dfd85dde/attachment.bin From jim at jimandkoka.com Wed Oct 31 09:56:55 2007 From: jim at jimandkoka.com (Jim Thomason) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: <4728B2BE.2090706@jrock.us> References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> <43e95380710310912u2589c89aqe7b3292cbb6788c0@mail.gmail.com> <4728ABED.8050406@jrock.us> <4728B008.6050105@jrock.us> <4728B2BE.2090706@jrock.us> Message-ID: <5cfdfaf70710310956q7a11e08dhb3a0684acaa15996@mail.gmail.com> > > Either combine the two lists, or stay off this one. > > > > Or what? I'm hoping for a big West Side Story musical gang fight where we all dance around and snap our fingers at each other. -Jim..... From Andy_Bach at wiwb.uscourts.gov Wed Oct 31 10:39:36 2007 From: Andy_Bach at wiwb.uscourts.gov (Andy_Bach at wiwb.uscourts.gov) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:39:36 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: > Because if you're going to be exclusive about being in your own little world, I (and others) don't want to hear about it. Not that it's matter too much, as I'm in the furthest 'burb of them all ("Madison, the nicest suburb of Chicago circa 2026") but I prefer to hear about them all on one list, even if it causes some duplication. is the easiest email handling process I have and w/ what, 800 msgs, I'm really good at it. my .018 dollars worth (rounded up) Andy Bach Systems Mangler Internet: andy_bach at wiwb.uscourts.gov VOICE: (608) 261-5738 FAX 264-5932 Boo! From brian.d.foy at gmail.com Wed Oct 31 11:50:01 2007 From: brian.d.foy at gmail.com (brian d foy) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> <43e95380710310912u2589c89aqe7b3292cbb6788c0@mail.gmail.com> <4728ABED.8050406@jrock.us> Message-ID: <2715accf0710311150i6de8bb46pc6496aef94fd98b5@mail.gmail.com> > But you can't have it both ways. In which universe does that law of phsyics exist? Perhaps you mean "I don't want you to have it both ways", but that gets us back to the original flame war of you saying that you don't control everything but acting like you do. If you don't like that a Chicago.pm list talks about things in Chicago, why don't you leave? Make another list and have whatever rules that you like. It's really easy. Don't pretend that this is your list though. -- brian d foy http://www.pair.com/~comdog/ From mrnicksgirl at gmail.com Wed Oct 31 12:02:24 2007 From: mrnicksgirl at gmail.com (Nola Stowe) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:02:24 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43e95380710311202j3329fc2asae038d483aa6d0ba@mail.gmail.com> all meeting announcements go to both lists downtown lunch events only go to windycity don't you guys have anything better to do? On 10/31/07, Andy_Bach at wiwb.uscourts.gov wrote: > > Because if you're going to be exclusive about being in your own little > world, I (and others) don't want to hear about it. > > Not that it's matter too much, as I'm in the furthest 'burb of them all > ("Madison, the nicest suburb of Chicago circa 2026") but I prefer to hear > about them all on one list, even if it causes some duplication. > is the easiest email handling process I have and w/ what, 800 msgs, I'm > really good at it. > > my .018 dollars worth (rounded up) > > Andy Bach > Systems Mangler > Internet: andy_bach at wiwb.uscourts.gov > VOICE: (608) 261-5738 FAX 264-5932 > > Boo! > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > -- http://rubygeek.com - my blog featuring: Ruby, PHP and Perl http://DevChix.com - boys can't have all the fun From arodland at comcast.net Wed Oct 31 12:35:49 2007 From: arodland at comcast.net (Andrew Rodland) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:35:49 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> <4728ABED.8050406@jrock.us> Message-ID: <200710311435.49853.arodland@comcast.net> On Wednesday 31 October 2007 11:29:46 am Andy Lester wrote: > On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > > (more downtown events)++ > > Please make up your mind about this division of groups. If you're > going to have WindyCity.pm be "downtown only", then keep the downtown- > only discussion on the WindyCity.pm list. Or, let's merge the two > lists back together as they were. But you can't have it both ways. > Or you, as the sole person who is constitutionally unable to get along with anyone, could leave the whole thing alone, and leave people to their friendly discussions, without jumping into conversations uninvited to snipe at people and dictate terms to the internet at large. If you can't do that, then I'd kindly request that you have the decency to delete this list, so that those of us who prefer civility can move elsewhere without causing undue confusion. Just, y'know, friendly suggestions. Andrew From mongers at bsod.net Wed Oct 31 12:40:20 2007 From: mongers at bsod.net (Pete Krawczyk) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:40:20 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [Chicago-talk] Our Community (was Re: Possible Talk Subject...?) In-Reply-To: <2715accf0710311150i6de8bb46pc6496aef94fd98b5@mail.gmail.com> References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> <43e95380710310912u2589c89aqe7b3292cbb6788c0@mail.gmail.com> <4728ABED.8050406@jrock.us> <2715accf0710311150i6de8bb46pc6496aef94fd98b5@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? From: brian d foy Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:50:01 -0400 }Don't pretend that this is your list though. : >> Chicago-talk list run by andy at petdance.com Really, this solves nothing. I thought the goal here was one group, talking and communicating together, sharing knowledge and promoting Perl. What happened to that? None of this looks good to anyone outside our group anymore, and I'll even wager to anyone inside the group. We've had a couple new people show up this year to a meeting, but other than that, we haven't grown as a group or as a community. We're supposed to be hosting a hackathon in a month and a half and a YAPC in seven months. How can we even think of doing those things if we can't even get along as a community? Today, I am ashamed to be a Chicago Perl Monger, because I can't stand to see a community torn apart by infighting. I've only been around since the WDI days, but since we lost that space it's pretty much all been downhill. It makes me believe that our usefulness as an educational, mentoring and cooperation community has come to an end. One thing's for sure, though: Someone needs to pick up the ball and make this community whole again, by hook or by crook. Until or unless that happens, our efforts at promoting Perl will be in vain. -Pete K -- Pete Krawczyk Chicago Perl Mongers mongers at bsod dot net From perl at cromedome.net Wed Oct 31 12:42:53 2007 From: perl at cromedome.net (Jason A. Crome) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:42:53 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Possible Talk Subject...? In-Reply-To: <200710311435.49853.arodland@comcast.net> References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> <4728ABED.8050406@jrock.us> <200710311435.49853.arodland@comcast.net> Message-ID: <4A916DF3-E696-4859-BCE8-687957DD5441@cromedome.net> Seriously, everyone needs to knock this shit off. Go find a gym, get some boxing gloves, and go beat the crap out of each other there. Get it off the fucking list. It doesn't do anyone any good. Kthxbye. On Oct 31, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Andrew Rodland wrote: > On Wednesday 31 October 2007 11:29:46 am Andy Lester wrote: >> On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Jonathan Rockway wrote: >>> (more downtown events)++ >> >> Please make up your mind about this division of groups. If you're >> going to have WindyCity.pm be "downtown only", then keep the >> downtown- >> only discussion on the WindyCity.pm list. Or, let's merge the two >> lists back together as they were. But you can't have it both ways. >> > > Or you, as the sole person who is constitutionally unable to get > along with > anyone, could leave the whole thing alone, and leave people to > their friendly > discussions, without jumping into conversations uninvited to snipe > at people > and dictate terms to the internet at large. > > If you can't do that, then I'd kindly request that you have the > decency to > delete this list, so that those of us who prefer civility can move > elsewhere > without causing undue confusion. > > Just, y'know, friendly suggestions. > > Andrew > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk > From dave at obtiva.com Wed Oct 31 13:00:02 2007 From: dave at obtiva.com (Dave Hoover) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:00:02 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Simple Photo Processing and Web Display Message-ID: <11c8704e0710311300p65109bf6gbbfa6d5c09810158@mail.gmail.com> Kent Cowgill has stepped forward to present at the next meeting in Wheaton. Topic: Simple Photo Processing and Web Display with Perl Also appearing: Imager, MIME::Lite, Email::MIME::Attachment::Stripper, and Image::ExifTool Location: IIT-Rice Campus, 201 East Loop Rd, Wheaton, IL Date/Time: Tuesday, November 13th, 2007 (7:00 PM - 9:00 PM) I will be organizing the Wheaton meetings going forward. See you there! Dave Hoover http://obtiva.com http://redsquirrel.com/dave From tom at yarrish.com Wed Oct 31 12:46:18 2007 From: tom at yarrish.com (Tom Yarrish) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Our Community (was Re: Possible Talk Subject...?) In-Reply-To: References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> <43e95380710310912u2589c89aqe7b3292cbb6788c0@mail.gmail.com> <4728ABED.8050406@jrock.us> <2715accf0710311150i6de8bb46pc6496aef94fd98b5@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <906706B3-CB1C-4154-8A8A-26411995C7E0@yarrish.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Oct 31, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Pete Krawczyk wrote: > > Really, this solves nothing. I thought the goal here was one group, > talking and communicating together, sharing knowledge and promoting > Perl. > What happened to that? > > None of this looks good to anyone outside our group anymore, and > I'll even > wager to anyone inside the group. We've had a couple new people > show up > this year to a meeting, but other than that, we haven't grown as a > group > or as a community. We're supposed to be hosting a hackathon in a > month > and a half and a YAPC in seven months. How can we even think of doing > those things if we can't even get along as a community? > > Today, I am ashamed to be a Chicago Perl Monger, because I can't > stand to > see a community torn apart by infighting. I've only been around > since the > WDI days, but since we lost that space it's pretty much all been > downhill. > It makes me believe that our usefulness as an educational, > mentoring and > cooperation community has come to an end. > > One thing's for sure, though: Someone needs to pick up the ball and > make > this community whole again, by hook or by crook. Until or unless that > happens, our efforts at promoting Perl will be in vain. > > -Pete K > -- > Pete Krawczyk > Chicago Perl Mongers > mongers at bsod dot net > _______________________________________________ > Chicago-talk mailing list > Chicago-talk at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk Amen to that brother....my thoughts exactly. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) iD8DBQFHKNuKZWzkfeDiTw4RAvPzAJ0fZkgiLwXvtLSufV6ZSxzB9QfIKwCeJBiY q2PndYRuk9L32/4iesQxCGU= =xrXM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From zrusilla at mac.com Wed Oct 31 13:31:18 2007 From: zrusilla at mac.com (Elizabeth Cortell) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:31:18 -0700 Subject: [Chicago-talk] Our Community (was Re: Possible Talk Subject...?) In-Reply-To: References: <9EFA307E-533A-4AA5-B30C-C3EF3F6A546F@c2group.net> <43e95380710310912u2589c89aqe7b3292cbb6788c0@mail.gmail.com> <4728ABED.8050406@jrock.us> <2715accf0710311150i6de8bb46pc6496aef94fd98b5@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hear, hear. I am not enjoying watching this from afar. I get along with ALL of my Chicago.pm homies because I make a POINT of it. Each and every one of us belongs, no matter our particular strengths and shortcomings. And let's face it, we all have...how to say it delicately...UNIQUE personalities. Small communities, such as Perl Mongers, English departments, hippie communes, Maoist parties, minor Protestant sects or avant-garde composers, are prone to power struggles, infighting, holy wars and backstabbing. We need to recognize this phenomenon and make it stop. Negative comments off list, please, and disagreements settled directly with the person in question. Liz Cortell LA.pm, TO.pm, Chi.pm emerita From andy at petdance.com Wed Oct 31 14:02:01 2007 From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:02:01 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] list traffic is stopped 'til tomorrow Message-ID: <6959EB46-D4F9-43E9-A916-AB60F1C72FE7@petdance.com> I've put the list on "no list traffic gets thru" mode for now. I'll look at turning it back on again tomorrow. Andy -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance From andy at petdance.com Wed Oct 31 14:10:45 2007 From: andy at petdance.com (Andy Lester) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:10:45 -0500 Subject: [Chicago-talk] List traffic part II Message-ID: <09A9923D-FB85-492A-B13B-432C2F7CC375@petdance.com> Let me try this again. I've turned off the list traffic for today because this flamewar is pointless, and cooling down can only help. If anyone really feels a need to have a flamefest, I'm sure there are other places it can happen. If you feel a burning need to have a flamefest, start it up again tomorrow. I hope tomorrow that maybe we can start fresh. -- Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance