[Chicago-talk] TT vs Mason

[Elias Lutfallah]

Thanks for the suggestions. I'll look into them, but I don't want to put
too many layers of abstraction in between my code and mod_perl. So far I
like Mason. It seems well suited to the project that I am working on. Very
well documented as well.

> On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 10:08 -0500, Alan Mead wrote:
>> Elias Lutfallah wrote:
>> > Thanks for the info. I think I'll stick with Mason. I dabbled with TT
>> a
>> > couple years back and didn't find it as intuitive as Mason. YMMV.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Eli
>> >
>>
>> Eli,
>>
>> Are you familiar with Catalyst or Maypole?
>>
>> http://search.cpan.org/~agrundma/Catalyst-5.6902/lib/Catalyst.pm
>> http://search.cpan.org/~teejay/Maypole-2.11_pre3/lib/Maypole.pm
>
> ..or http://www.jifty.org (which uses mason)
>   or http://www.plainblack.com/webgui
>
>
>
>
>>
>> >From your description... I thought these might be handy.  I guess you
>> could say that Catalyst adds an MVC framework to TT.
>>
>> -Alan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chicago-talk mailing list
>> Chicago-talk at pm.org
>> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
> --
> Scott T. Hildreth <shild at sbcglobal.net>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago-talk mailing list
> Chicago-talk at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
>


-- 
Elias Lutfallah
Chief Technology Officer
Mortgage Desk, Inc.