[Chicago-talk] Django / Rails Event
jason at multiply.org
Thu Dec 8 09:02:31 PST 2005
yes in the similar, however, catalyst is kinda like
frankenstein,cobbled together from the corpses of those long since
IMO, the strength of catalyst lies in excellent controllers and a
completely simple way to support multiple technologies for the view.
The model part of it suffers a lot in comparison to Django and
Rails. In and of themselves, the perl ORMs are not so bad, but none
of them integrate into the rest of Catalyst as well as ActiveRecord
in rails or the Django bidness.
On Dec 8, 2005, at 10:42 AM, Edward Summers wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2005, at 11:02 PM, Jason Gessner wrote:
>> I am still following it very closely, but it is a totally different
> Aren't all three essentially MVC web frameworks? I'm that catalyst is
> different (as RoR and Django are) but isn't it more similar than it
> is different?
> Chicago-talk mailing list
> Chicago-talk at pm.org
More information about the Chicago-talk