[Chicago-talk] HTML::Tree progress

Shawn Carroll shawn.c.carroll at gmail.com
Sun Sep 19 14:04:04 CDT 2004


Should we forward this to the author?  Or get the author on the list?


On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:39:37 -0500, Leland Johnson <easyasy2k at gmail.com> wrote:
> Wow, that does sound interesting. Too bad I can't really look into it
> right now. I've still got to do some of the POD markup stuff and see
> if I have commit privileges.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 10:41:26 -0500, Andy Lester <andy at petdance.com> wrote:
> > > oldparse.t passes the 'nested-comment' test?  So...  I am now
> > > suspecting the 'new_from_*' calls as not performing some step when
> > > wrapping the lower level calls...?  Hopefully I'll find time today to
> > > dig deeper...
> > >
> >
> > Beautiful.  This is exactly the sort of thing I thought we might dig up.
> >
> >
> >
> > xoxo,
> > Andy
> >
> > --
> > Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chicago-talk mailing list
> > Chicago-talk at mail.pm.org
> > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Leland Johnson
> http://protoplasmic.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago-talk mailing list
> Chicago-talk at mail.pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
> 



-- 
shawn.c.carroll at gmail.com
Perl Programmer
Soccer Referee


More information about the Chicago-talk mailing list