[Chicago-talk] HTML::Tree progress
Shawn Carroll
shawn.c.carroll at gmail.com
Sun Sep 19 14:04:04 CDT 2004
Should we forward this to the author? Or get the author on the list?
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:39:37 -0500, Leland Johnson <easyasy2k at gmail.com> wrote:
> Wow, that does sound interesting. Too bad I can't really look into it
> right now. I've still got to do some of the POD markup stuff and see
> if I have commit privileges.
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 10:41:26 -0500, Andy Lester <andy at petdance.com> wrote:
> > > oldparse.t passes the 'nested-comment' test? So... I am now
> > > suspecting the 'new_from_*' calls as not performing some step when
> > > wrapping the lower level calls...? Hopefully I'll find time today to
> > > dig deeper...
> > >
> >
> > Beautiful. This is exactly the sort of thing I thought we might dig up.
> >
> >
> >
> > xoxo,
> > Andy
> >
> > --
> > Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chicago-talk mailing list
> > Chicago-talk at mail.pm.org
> > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
> >
>
>
> --
> Leland Johnson
> http://protoplasmic.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago-talk mailing list
> Chicago-talk at mail.pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
>
--
shawn.c.carroll at gmail.com
Perl Programmer
Soccer Referee
More information about the Chicago-talk
mailing list