[Chicago-talk] What module will we attack?
Shawn Carroll
shawn.c.carroll at gmail.com
Wed Aug 11 13:42:24 CDT 2004
I won't be too hurt I guess. Let's go after Scalar::List::Utils...
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:36:37 -0500, Andy Lester <andy at petdance.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 12:38:24PM -0500, Mike Fragassi (frag at ripco.com) wrote:
> > Another one that would be feasible is HTML::Tree. (Author: SBURKE, %42
> > coverage). Or Scalar::List::Utils. (GBARR, %36 coverage.) Or we can go
> > for broke: CGI.pm! (70% coverage.)
>
> HTML::Tree or Scalar::List::Utils would seem to me to be even better
> choices. I'm sure Graham would be on board, and I can't imagine Sean
> wouldn't as well.
>
> Shawn: Do you mind if we poke at one of these instead?
>
>
>
> xoa
>
> --
> Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
> _______________________________________________
> Chicago-talk mailing list
> Chicago-talk at mail.pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
>
--
shawn.c.carroll at gmail.com
Perl Programmer
Soccer Referee
More information about the Chicago-talk
mailing list