[yapc] Missing subcribers

[Bradley Andersen]

Ah, another one, eh?

If I have so lowered myself, why should it warrant a response?

/bda


On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Chris Nehren <c.nehren/yapc at shadowcat.co.uk
> wrote:

> [top-posting considered harmful; please quote in context]
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 14:17:03 -0400 , Bradley Andersen wrote:
> > This thread is _not_ spam?
>
> Then you don't have to read it. I'm sure your MUA has an option to
> automatically mark messages as read. Even the Google Web UI can do that.
>
> > J.T. is doing a fine job. [...]
>
> [Two paragraphs of ad hominem snipped. Let's keep it civil and
> fact-based, please; this *is* a discussion for a technical event, after
> all]
>
> That's your opinion, and you are perfectly entitled to it. I do not see
> anywhere in this thread where mst or uri are saying JT is doing a
> horrible job altogether. This is merely a *suggestion* of how to reach
> more people and thus have an *even better* conference. It's meta, for
> sure, but by no means spam.
>
> Of course, the people making this argument are also rather opinionated
> and about as blunt as the side of a barn. Their approach has its merits
> and its drawbacks, for sure, but it doesn't warrant ad hominem.
>
> > PS: Fire away!
>
> This is neither welcome nor desired, and in saying things like this you
> lower yourself to the level where you imagine Matt to be.
>
> --
> Chris Nehren           | Coder, Sysadmin, Masochist
> Shadowcat Systems Ltd. | http://shadowcat.co.uk/
> _______________________________________________
> yapc mailing list
> yapc at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/yapc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/yapc/attachments/20120525/bc3e2995/attachment.html>