[yapc] Talk submissions are closed

Michael Peters mpeters at plusthree.com
Thu Apr 29 11:18:26 PDT 2010

On 04/29/2010 02:14 PM, Scott Walters wrote:

> I'd like to politely descent here.  Having a full length talk rejected
> is not a sure indication that that speaker should not be speaking,
> period.

In this case it probably is. They didn't reject anyone. That, to me is a 
cause for concern. I come to conferences expecting to see quality 
presentations. Yes this is a community event and we are all amateurs, 
but by accepting all presentations it means there was no vetting 
process, no selection criteria and no general theme. 5 tracks might just 
be too many for a small 300 person conference.

Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP

More information about the yapc mailing list