[yapc] Talk submissions are closed
Michael Peters
mpeters at plusthree.com
Thu Apr 29 11:18:26 PDT 2010
On 04/29/2010 02:14 PM, Scott Walters wrote:
> I'd like to politely descent here. Having a full length talk rejected
> is not a sure indication that that speaker should not be speaking,
> period.
In this case it probably is. They didn't reject anyone. That, to me is a
cause for concern. I come to conferences expecting to see quality
presentations. Yes this is a community event and we are all amateurs,
but by accepting all presentations it means there was no vetting
process, no selection criteria and no general theme. 5 tracks might just
be too many for a small 300 person conference.
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
More information about the yapc
mailing list