[yapc] Talk submissions are closed
scott at slowass.net
Thu Apr 29 11:16:38 PDT 2010
Ooops, I missed a "no" in my hasty reading and hasty reply. Pardon me.
In that case, it's awesome we agree! Let's be BFFs!!
*Five* rooms? I was wondering about this. Is there any way we can
repeat the conference the next weekend and run the whole thing twice?
On 0, Dave Rolsky <autarch at urth.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, David Fetter wrote:
> >I know you meant well by this, but please, NEVER encourage anyone to do
> >their not-accepted long talk as a lightning talk. It simply won't fit
> >in the time allotted, and makes the speaker look like a desperate fool.
> >A lightning talk is a completely different beast from any other kind,
> >and is something you write from the ground up as a lightning talk.
> I think you're reading too much into this. If you wanted to talk about
> Project X for 40 minutes, there's no reason you can't talk about Project X
> for 5 minutes instead.
> http://VegGuide.org http://blog.urth.org
> Your guide to all that's veg House Absolute(ly Pointless)
> yapc mailing list
> yapc at pm.org
More information about the yapc