Wellington Perl Mongers Meeting in 3 Weeks
jules.anderson at zivo.co.nz
Sun Jun 11 21:59:14 CDT 2000
> Finally, I'd like to leave you with this quote from Larry Rosler
> (another Perl Hacker), bemoaning what he refers to as 'evaporating
> expectations of software quality' in an interview on www.perl.com
> ( http://www.perl.com/pub/2000/06/rosler.html ):
> 1980's paradigm: If it's worth implementing once,
> it's worth implementing twice.
> 1990's paradigm: Ship the prototype!
> 2000's paradigm: Ship the idea!
Actually, from that article I was more interested in some of his
comments about OO development and Perl (negative, for those who
haven't read it). I've had some sucess using the UML and Perl in a
very strongly OO style, and while I didn't do any serious performance
testing I felt it behaved very well. Perhaps more importantly, however,
I ended up writing some of the tightest, nicest Perl I've ever written,
while retaining a design that could (and was) easily extended. It was
a bit of an experiment and I was astonished how well it paid off.
I'd be interested in others comments about Perl and OO, espcially
in light of Rosler's comments about complexity and performance.
More information about the Wellington-pm