From darren at DarrenDuncan.net Sat Mar 8 01:58:35 2008 From: darren at DarrenDuncan.net (Darren Duncan) Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 01:58:35 -0800 Subject: [VPM] Tuesday March 11 VLUG Meeting : Programming! Message-ID: This message is forwarded from the Victoria Linux Users Group mailing list. -- Darren Duncan ------------- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:28:58 -0800 To: discuss at vlug.org From: "Larry Gagnon" Subject: [Discuss] Tuesday March 11 VLUG Meeting : Programming! List-Id: discuss.vlug.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Just a reminder to all members and friends that the monthly VLUG meeting is this Tuesday, March 11th. We will meet at UVic, Cornett Bldg, Rm B108, 7PM, but it is likely we will move to rooom A125 from there (if free. We are awaiting formal UVic approval to use Room A125 for future meetings). John Blomfield will give a talk entitled: "Writing Programs for Linux". The first half of the talk will discuss the basic differences between programming languages, interpreters and compilers, with some simple examples. GUI's, widgets, IDE's and software installation will be discussed briefly. In the second half of the talk John will demonstrate the use of the IDE KDevelop and Qt Designer, first on some simple programs and then progressing to multi-file projects. Discussion will include C++, Qt and STL libraries. This should prove to be an interesting and educational talk for beginners and advanced Linux users. Tell all your friends about us and hope to see you there. Larry Gagnon _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss at vlug.org http://ladybug.vlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss From Peter at PSDT.com Mon Mar 10 10:04:12 2008 From: Peter at PSDT.com (Peter Scott) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:04:12 -0700 Subject: [VPM] March meeting? Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.2.20080310100139.0225e910@mail.webquarry.com> Can I see a show of hands for who would be interested in a March Victoria Perl Mongers meeting please? I could present: Parsing with Parse::RecDescent New features in 5.10 Probably both, since they're about an hour each. The meeting would be on the 18th if it takes place but only if there's sufficient expression of interest. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies http://www.perldebugged.com/ http://www.perlmedic.com/ From mock at obscurity.org Mon Mar 10 11:05:52 2008 From: mock at obscurity.org (mock) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:05:52 +0000 Subject: [VPM] March meeting? In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20080310100139.0225e910@mail.webquarry.com> References: <6.2.3.4.2.20080310100139.0225e910@mail.webquarry.com> Message-ID: <20080310180552.GD32319@obscurity.org> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:04:12AM -0700, Peter Scott wrote: > Can I see a show of hands for who would be interested in a March > Victoria Perl Mongers meeting please? I could present: > > Parsing with Parse::RecDescent > > New features in 5.10 > > Probably both, since they're about an hour each. The meeting would be > on the 18th if it takes place but only if there's sufficient expression > of interest. > -- > I can't do it this month. Got to be in Vancouver for a conference. I'd be interested in next month though... From darren at DarrenDuncan.net Mon Mar 10 12:52:19 2008 From: darren at DarrenDuncan.net (Darren Duncan) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:52:19 -0700 Subject: [VPM] March meeting? In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20080310100139.0225e910@mail.webquarry.com> References: <6.2.3.4.2.20080310100139.0225e910@mail.webquarry.com> Message-ID: At 10:04 AM -0700 3/10/08, Peter Scott wrote: >Can I see a show of hands for who would be interested in a March >Victoria Perl Mongers meeting please? I could present: > > Parsing with Parse::RecDescent > > New features in 5.10 > >Probably both, since they're about an hour each. The meeting would be >on the 18th if it takes place but only if there's sufficient expression >of interest. Both of those topics would interest me. And the 18th would probably work for me, but I can also wait for a month to accommodate mock et al. Assuming we can't just meet on a different day this month. -- Darren Duncan From Peter at PSDT.com Wed Mar 12 17:28:54 2008 From: Peter at PSDT.com (Peter Scott) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:28:54 -0700 Subject: [VPM] Testing module alert Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.2.20080312172828.03002540@mail.webquarry.com> I just discovered problems with the very new Test::Tester module and the quite new Test::Builder module in the Test::Simple distribution. The check_test() function does not work right in Test::Tester any more (don't know why it passed its tests) and this causes, for instance, Test::Output to fail its tests (horribly). Quite probably many other modules would be affected, albeit only in their tests. I have alerted the module authors and rolled back using the following CPAN shell commands: install M/MS/MSCHWERN/Test-Simple-0.74.tar.gz install F/FD/FDALY/Test-Tester-0.106.tar.gz I suggest waiting for a version of Test::Tester with a version number > 0.107 and a version of Test::Simple with a version number > 0.79_01. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies http://www.perldebugged.com/ http://www.perlmedic.com/ From darren at DarrenDuncan.net Wed Mar 12 17:36:23 2008 From: darren at DarrenDuncan.net (Darren Duncan) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:36:23 -0700 Subject: [VPM] Testing module alert In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20080312172828.03002540@mail.webquarry.com> References: <6.2.3.4.2.20080312172828.03002540@mail.webquarry.com> Message-ID: At 5:28 PM -0700 3/12/08, Peter Scott wrote: >I just discovered problems with the very new Test::Tester module and >the quite new Test::Builder module in the Test::Simple >distribution. The check_test() function does not work right in >Test::Tester any more (don't know why it passed its tests) and this >causes, for instance, Test::Output to fail its tests (horribly). Quite >probably many other modules would be affected, albeit only in their tests. > >I have alerted the module authors and rolled back using the following >CPAN shell commands: > > install M/MS/MSCHWERN/Test-Simple-0.74.tar.gz > install F/FD/FDALY/Test-Tester-0.106.tar.gz > >I suggest waiting for a version of Test::Tester with a version number > >0.107 and a version of Test::Simple with a version number > 0.79_01. Is Victoria.pm the mailing list that you intended to contact with that post, in contrast to a more general CPAN list? In any event, I've always been using Test::More for my own modules, which is bundled with Perl, and it is plenty simple enough. -- Darren Duncan From Peter at PSDT.com Wed Mar 12 18:05:42 2008 From: Peter at PSDT.com (Peter Scott) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:05:42 -0700 Subject: [VPM] Testing module alert In-Reply-To: References: <6.2.3.4.2.20080312172828.03002540@mail.webquarry.com> Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.2.20080312180339.02fd9070@mail.webquarry.com> At 05:36 PM 3/12/2008, Darren Duncan wrote: >At 5:28 PM -0700 3/12/08, Peter Scott wrote: > >I just discovered problems with the very new Test::Tester module and > >the quite new Test::Builder module in the Test::Simple > >distribution. The check_test() function does not work right in > >Test::Tester any more (don't know why it passed its tests) and this > >causes, for instance, Test::Output to fail its tests (horribly). Quite > >probably many other modules would be affected, albeit only in their tests. > > > >I have alerted the module authors and rolled back using the following > >CPAN shell commands: > > > > install M/MS/MSCHWERN/Test-Simple-0.74.tar.gz > > install F/FD/FDALY/Test-Tester-0.106.tar.gz > > > >I suggest waiting for a version of Test::Tester with a version number > > >0.107 and a version of Test::Simple with a version number > 0.79_01. > >Is Victoria.pm the mailing list that you intended to contact with >that post, in contrast to a more general CPAN list? I may have been too hasty. Even though I verified this behaviour on two different machines, I am now no longer able to reproduce it, i.e., the newer versions of Test::Simple and Test::Tester work just fine with Test::Output. I am trying to figure out why I saw what I did. >In any event, I've always been using Test::More for my own modules, >which is bundled with Perl, and it is plenty simple enough. Test::More is part of the Test::Simple distribution. And Test::Output is extremely handy if you want to test things output to stdout or stderr. Without that you have to much around with IO::Scalar or similar. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies http://www.perldebugged.com/ http://www.perlmedic.com/