<html>
<body>
I am at a cross roads in my career. I have a brilliant idea and I
know exactly how I want to do it and I want to do it in pure object
oriented Pearl, the correct way the first time. First my abstract
for a paper I know exactly how to write if only I completely understood
pure Pearl Objects.<br><br>
I have been doing exactly the same thing since 1995 with, wait for
it:<br><br>
dos C. With a limited understanding of pointers never mind
objects. I knew pointers were the key to understanding memory which
was somehow important. I quickly learned how important.
Sometimes it took days to learn how one misplaced pointer could screw
things up, eventually. And then it took days to figure out how to
fix it. Then I worked for a guy who understood that pointers were
not 2 dimensional, nor 3 dimensional. In fact
multi-dimensional. Cool, I know I can use this someday and let it
lie. <br><br>
We continued to use our same 2 dimensional model to represent a quasi 3
dimensional model. It was very effective, and very fast and has
made my a good portion over my career. I know have a way to solve a
problem that bothered my since I started making money with this
model. It isn't as accurate as some people would like. Who
cares, it has made me a fair amount of money and has made other people a
lot more. <br><br>
I know what the next step is and I want to "control it".
All I need is to become an expert in Pearl fast, very fast. The
best way to become an expert on anything is to write a paper, present
some nice pictures at a conference and you are off the races. That
is what I did in 2001. I co-authored other papers but let the other
person do the conference thing - ever two years or so since then.
So he gets the benefit, because he completely understand and uses this
model and the tools I developed. <br><br>
Here is my abstract:<br><br>
<font size=3>A Perl Object Oriented Program to model a multi-dimension
matrix. <br>
<br>
We have developed Perl Object, Multi-D, control a 2-d matrix model to
represent the same 3-d system.<br><br>
</font>It is as simple as that. I know all the math, I know
the complete structure of the Object. I know all the inputs and
outputs to each object within the object right down to the base object
and how it all interrelates to product the same output object. I
also know the complete structure of the output object and how all its
tiny little objects represent all the tiny little objects in the input
Object. So in essence, I have a fairly good understanding of the
object. And I have it all laid out and named and what each object
represents in 10 files. Text files all object oriented. I
need the Object Multi-D to first read these files to create itself.
<br><br>
Does this sound like an exciting, challenging pure Pearl Object? I
need a co-author. I have been to the Mongers meeting with another
Pearl problem about this same Object which I already knew but didn't know
what to do with it that might get someone interested. <br><br>
Can I come to another Mongers meet, this time with a nice slide show with
pictures and matrixes and solvers and structures and all that
stuff. <br><br>
The curve is just about to start because I started it, the same as I did
in 2001. <br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
>><br>
Christopher Jones, P.Eng.<br>
Suite 1801, 1 Yonge Street<br>
Toronto, ON M5E1W7<br>
Tel. 416-203-7465<br>
Fax. 416-946-1005<br>
email cj@enersave.ca<br>
</body>
</html>