SPUG: rejecting PERL applicants?

[C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP]

ITYM pædantic

On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 18:00 -0600, Robin Darby wrote:
> LOL!
> YES, but it's probably a lucky escape for the candidate, if you are that pedantic! :)
> 
> Ty
>   Robin... 
> 
> On 8 Jun 2012, at 15:46, Andrew Sweger wrote:
> 
> > Am I out of my gourd for refusing to consider job applicants that put PERL
> > (in all caps) in their resume for a senior position?
> > 
> > (Am I trolling? Perhaps a little. But the question has been on my mind and
> > it's been awfully quiet around here?)
> > 
> > -- 
> > Andrew B. Sweger -- The great thing about multitasking is that several
> >                                things can go wrong at once.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _____________________________________________________________
> > Seattle Perl Users Group Mailing List
> >     POST TO: spug-list at pm.org
> > SUBSCRIPTION: http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/spug-list
> >    MEETINGS: 3rd Tuesdays
> >    WEB PAGE: http://seattleperl.org/
> 
> _____________________________________________________________
> Seattle Perl Users Group Mailing List
>      POST TO: spug-list at pm.org
> SUBSCRIPTION: http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/spug-list
>     MEETINGS: 3rd Tuesdays
>     WEB PAGE: http://seattleperl.org/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/spug-list/attachments/20120608/9f31c145/attachment.bin>