SPUG: Piping a file to perl to execute
JD Brennan
jazzdev at gmail.com
Thu Sep 7 14:26:05 PDT 2006
Interesting. I'd say using a byte-code or native-code
compiler would be better than encryption.
David said he just wants to keep the code from
a 'casual user' so compiling would accomplish
that.
JD
On 9/7/06, Murray Chapman <muzzle at imdb.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, David S. Patterson wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to kludge together a strategy to protect some perl source
> code from
> > prying eyes (this would be on a Unix-like system).
>
> > Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions about this?
>
> See:
>
> http://omaha.pm.org/emails/2003/msg00188.html
>
> and then if you still want to proceed:
>
> Filter::Crypto
>
>
> Murray
>
>
> -- Murray Chapman Zheenl Punczna --
> -- muzzle at imdb.com zhmmyr at vzqo.pbz --
>
> -- Internet Movie Database Vagrearg Zbivr Qngnonfr --
> -- http://www.imdb.com uggc://jjj.vzqo.pbz --
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> Seattle Perl Users Group Mailing List
> POST TO: spug-list at pm.org
> SUBSCRIPTION: http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/spug-list
> MEETINGS: 3rd Tuesdays
> WEB PAGE: http://seattleperl.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/spug-list/attachments/20060907/15293c9b/attachment.html
More information about the spug-list
mailing list