SPUG: Piping a file to perl to execute

JD Brennan jazzdev at gmail.com
Thu Sep 7 14:26:05 PDT 2006


Interesting.  I'd say using a byte-code or native-code
compiler would be better than encryption.

David said he just wants to keep the code from
a 'casual user' so compiling would accomplish
that.

JD


On 9/7/06, Murray Chapman <muzzle at imdb.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, David S. Patterson wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to kludge together a strategy to protect some perl source
> code from
> > prying eyes (this would be on a Unix-like system).
>
> > Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions about this?
>
> See:
>
>   http://omaha.pm.org/emails/2003/msg00188.html
>
> and then if you still want to proceed:
>
>   Filter::Crypto
>
>
> Murray
>
>
> -- Murray Chapman                               Zheenl Punczna          --
> -- muzzle at imdb.com                              zhmmyr at vzqo.pbz         --
>
> -- Internet Movie Database                      Vagrearg Zbivr Qngnonfr --
> -- http://www.imdb.com                          uggc://jjj.vzqo.pbz     --
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> Seattle Perl Users Group Mailing List
>      POST TO: spug-list at pm.org
> SUBSCRIPTION: http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/spug-list
>     MEETINGS: 3rd Tuesdays
>     WEB PAGE: http://seattleperl.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/spug-list/attachments/20060907/15293c9b/attachment.html 


More information about the spug-list mailing list