On Wednesday, February 8, 2006, at 01:42 PM, apv wrote: > That's right and even s/\s+/ /g can be improved b/c as is it is > substituting > every " " with a " " too which is pointless. This would be closer to > the > literal intent: Sorry, this > s/ */ /g; should have been s/ +/ /g; Otherwise it's no different from the original.