SPUG: Spug-wiki trashed again

Simon Wilcox essuu at ourshack.com
Sun Oct 9 09:53:23 PDT 2005

On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Tim Maher wrote:

> There's got to be a better way to maintain a Wiki than to have
> a guy monitoring it 24x7 and manually restoring earlier
> archived pages.
> Any ideas?

Registered users only can update ?

And you need to be subscribed to the list to be a registered user.

I know that this goes slightly against the concept of the anyone-can-edit
wiki but really, how many people outside of the list should be editing the
pages anyway ?


More information about the spug-list mailing list