SPUG: diference between Test::More and use Test::Simple tests
Medrano-Zaldivar, L E
LMedrano-Zaldivar at ciber.com
Mon Jun 6 14:13:53 PDT 2005
how can be implementing Test: more with Test::Harness?
From: Colin Meyer
Sent: Mon 6/6/2005 3:03 PM
To: Medrano-Zaldivar, L E
Cc: spug-list at pm.org
Subject: Re: SPUG: diference between Test::More and use Test::Simple tests
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 01:47:32PM -0700, Medrano-Zaldivar, L E wrote:
> I got a script I need to modify on the script is using Test::More
> module but on this cases I don't have output of if the OK() errors or
> nothing like that and I would like to implement Test::Simple tests
> module get a feel if is working or not but I haven't see much
> documentation about this. Any of you has experience implementing this
> modules or if you can point me to documentation where make this
I am not sure if I am understanding your question correctly.
Test::More and Test::Simple are compatible with eachother. They both
produce output that can be consumed by Test::Harness, and are inline
with the defacto testing style of nearly all CPAN modules.
If you have some existing tests for your script, and would like to write
additional tests using Test::Simple instead of Test::More, then yes,
that will work fine.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the spug-list