SPUG: interesting while() behavior and hosting recs
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
sthoenna at efn.org
Sun Oct 3 07:16:53 CDT 2004
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 04:09:32AM -0700, "John W. Krahn" <krahnj at telus.net> wrote:
> Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>
> >They are just there for reasons of precedence. Parens really really
> >really truly don't function as list constructors.
>
> So in the expressions:
>
> while ( () ) { print "this won't print\n" }
>
> $count = () = $string =~ /\d+/g;
>
> You are saying that there is no list?
:) For every rule, there's an exception; () is the exception here.
But it doesn't work by way of some grammatical rule that what's inside
() is a list; empty parens are handled in perl's grammar as a special
case. I guess you could look at it as the parentheses being required
to delimit the empty list for which there is no other syntactic
provision.
More information about the spug-list
mailing list