SPUG: Some changes I'd like in Perl
sthoenna at efn.org
Thu Nov 28 12:22:03 CST 2002
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:09:13 -0800, tim at consultix-inc.com wrote:
>I submitted a serious bug report concerning "Restricted
>Hashes" earlier this week, using "perlbug", and it went to
>the perl5porters list, where it's been vigorously ignored.
I saw it and started to take a look at it. You'll find the reception
bugs get varies quite a lot based on how busy people are and whether
or not it catches the eye of someone familiar with a particular piece
of perl. In general, I'd recommend resending a bug report to
perl5-porters at perl.org (with the assigned bug-id in the subject) if a
week goes by with no response.
>If that's the reception real bugs get, what chance would I
>have with minor recommendations there? Maybe I should just
>email these suggestions directly to the pumpking? Who is that
>these days? Etc. . . .
Hugo van der Sanden <hv at crypt.org> is the pumpking. But he would
probably just bounce your mail to p5p, so you might as well start there.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
POST TO: spug-list at pm.org PROBLEMS: owner-spug-list at pm.org
Subscriptions; Email to majordomo at pm.org: ACTION LIST EMAIL
Replace ACTION by subscribe or unsubscribe, EMAIL by your Email-address
For daily traffic, use spug-list for LIST ; for weekly, spug-list-digest
Seattle Perl Users Group (SPUG) Home Page: http://seattleperl.org
More information about the spug-list