SPUG: software libertarianism (was: Scope question)
cmeyer at helvella.org
Fri Jun 14 22:20:51 CDT 2002
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 06:47:53PM -0700, Asim Jalis wrote:
> Perl's permissiveness with object fields and also
> its lack of method prototyping makes changing the
> code a frightening experience.
Aha! A simply stated problem where Perl falls short of other languages
for large projects.
I can certainly relate to this from the experience of maintaining own
code and others.
> The interpreter does not care if I change the
> number of parameters to a method and forget to fix
> some of the calls.
To combat this problem, I like to code methods to take
$mushroom->name( GENUS => 'Melanoleuca',
SPECIES => 'verrucipes' );
The extra typing makes the fingers a tad wearier, but the code
is easier to read later. And this isn't much of a solution
to existing code, which there's plenty of.
> It also does not care if I
> rename a field in half my code but forget to
> rename it in a few places.
> While there are some solutions to this they are
> all fat. Class::Multimethods and Class::Struct
> make classes slow and expensive to use. It would
> be nice if these features were supported in raw
> Perl through something like "use strict".
There's Tie::SecureHash. (Disclaimer: I haven't used it, other than
tinkering, but enjoyed the lecture at TPC a couple of years ago.) It's
model is run with slow, tied, very strict objects during devel and
testing; untie for speed at deployment.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
POST TO: spug-list at pm.org PROBLEMS: owner-spug-list at pm.org
Subscriptions; Email to majordomo at pm.org: ACTION LIST EMAIL
Replace ACTION by subscribe or unsubscribe, EMAIL by your Email-address
For daily traffic, use spug-list for LIST ; for weekly, spug-list-digest
Seattle Perl Users Group (SPUG) Home Page: http://seattleperl.org
More information about the spug-list