SPUG: Debugging methodology (was: How to deal with same name packages?)

El JoPe Magnifico jope-spug at jope.net
Wed Jan 30 02:47:39 CST 2002


On 29 Jan 2002, Michael R. Wolf wrote:
> Tim Maher <tim at consultix-inc.com> writes:
>> That's just too kinky. I thought the whole idea of this backwards
>> statement was to make the code *easier* to read, not to make it
>> harder to see how much is being executed conditionally!
[...]
> As with all formatting and logic issues in programming,
> there are competing values toward a balance point.

If you're into kinky code, just wait til Perl 6's switch-on-steroids
becomes an option.  Man, the RFC on that thing made my brain hurt.
Which was an obvious sign that Damian wrote it, of course.  =)
 -jp


 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
     POST TO: spug-list at pm.org       PROBLEMS: owner-spug-list at pm.org
      Subscriptions; Email to majordomo at pm.org:  ACTION  LIST  EMAIL
  Replace ACTION by subscribe or unsubscribe, EMAIL by your Email-address
 For daily traffic, use spug-list for LIST ;  for weekly, spug-list-digest
     Seattle Perl Users Group (SPUG) Home Page: http://seattleperl.org





More information about the spug-list mailing list