SPUG: Self-generating code: yea or nay? (was: Dijsktra is Dead)
Jonathan Gardner
jgardn at alumni.washington.edu
Fri Aug 9 22:12:32 CDT 2002
On Friday 09 August 2002 08:03 am, Richard Anderson wrote:
> And what is the reason for not simply writing a perl program using DBD/DBI?
> This would seem to be a cleaner implementation, more maintenance-friendly.
>
When you're dealing with many gigabytes of data, even the small overhead of
having DBI get in the way is a large cost. The plan is to keep it all as
low-level as possible to turn a several hour job into a few hours. I write
bash scripts because bash is much better suited for running the programs
directly.
Perl is great for organizing the scripts. I can make a few changes to the perl
script, and change which tables and rows I am grabbing.
--
Jonathan Gardner
jgardn at alumni.washington.edu
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
POST TO: spug-list at pm.org PROBLEMS: owner-spug-list at pm.org
Subscriptions; Email to majordomo at pm.org: ACTION LIST EMAIL
Replace ACTION by subscribe or unsubscribe, EMAIL by your Email-address
For daily traffic, use spug-list for LIST ; for weekly, spug-list-digest
Seattle Perl Users Group (SPUG) Home Page: http://seattleperl.org
More information about the spug-list
mailing list