SPUG: XML::XPath, LibXML Re: [was can't die() ...]
cmeyer at helvella.org
Mon Sep 17 20:04:13 CDT 2001
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 03:35:05PM -0700, Douglas Leonard wrote:
> I'd recommend moving towards XML::LibXML rather than something such as
> XML::XPath if you are looking for reasonable speed of execution. I used
> XPath on my last project and have been regretting it ever since because it
> is so slow. The reiterative manner in which it builds relationships can
> severely impact performance on even relatively small datasets.
I'd agree that XML::XPath is very slow at what it does. I should have
added that I typically have used it for one-time processing, and not for
dynamic requests. If your processing is cached with a system like
AxKit, that can also help out on dynamic request times.
Hmm, upon examining the documentation of XML::LibXML, I see that it
supports XPath notation through the findnodes() method. It even
seems that Matt Seargent made the API quite similar to XML::XPath,
so porting should be easy. I'll have to give it a whirl.
The only downside to XML::LibXML that I can see is that it doesn't yet
support SAX. It seems that the underlying c library does support SAX.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
POST TO: spug-list at pm.org PROBLEMS: owner-spug-list at pm.org
Subscriptions; Email to majordomo at pm.org: ACTION LIST EMAIL
Replace ACTION by subscribe or unsubscribe, EMAIL by your Email-address
For daily traffic, use spug-list for LIST ; for weekly, spug-list-digest
Seattle Perl Users Group (SPUG) Home Page: http://zipcon.net/spug/
More information about the spug-list