From philiph at pobox.com Mon Jan 2 15:57:53 2012 From: philiph at pobox.com (Philip J. Hollenback) Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:57:53 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] #code2011 on twitter Message-ID: <1325548673.15381.140661018480085@webmail.messagingengine.com> Tracking the languages people claimed they used in 2011: http://code2011.hybridgroup.com/ so apparently I need to write some javascript to get with the program. (I know this is baloney and it only checks the last 100 tweets with the #code2011 tag) P. -- Philip J. Hollenback philiph at pobox.com www.hollenback.net From earl at ruby.org Tue Jan 3 20:13:49 2012 From: earl at ruby.org (Earl Ruby) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:13:49 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] [job] Senior Perl Programmer Message-ID: Senior Perl Programmer http://www.webcdr.com/about/careers (second listing on the page) You will be developing hosted software for the telecom industry using Perl, Linux, Apache, Oracle, and Javascript. You will be part of a devops team responsible for developing new features and managing systems. Required Technical Skills Strong software development skills: requirements, architecture, design, implementation, and maintenance. 4-year Computer Science, Math, or related degree, or equivalent experience. 6+ years Perl programming experience. Strong Linux sysadmin abilities including knowledge of iptables, ipsec, ipvs, Nagios, SMTP, Xen, Git, Apache. Database skills (Oracle a plus). Web application development skills. Professional Excellent spoken and written English. This position requires direct customer interaction for requirements gathering and application support. Proven ability to document what you do. Highly productive; revenue aware. Ability to accept direction and instruction from management. Ability to track and communicate status of your projects to management on a recurring basis. Ability to help clients via telephone and email. Desired (not required) technical skills These are desired skills. If there are gaps in your knowledge we have no problem teaching you if you want to learn new skills. We like people who like to learn new skills. Understanding of setting up and configuring ospf, bonding, BGP, managed switches. High-availability systems setup. Telecom/SIP/VoIP knowledge. Cyclades console server setup. Personal Highly intelligent, innovative problem-solver. Detail oriented with strong follow-through. Ability to learn new concepts quickly. Happy working solo or in a team. Reliable, trustworthy, honest. Sense of humor a must. Benefits As close to BART as you can get (building has its own entrance inside the Montgomery BART station). Medical, dental, vision, paid vacation. Centrally located in San Francisco near restaurants, cafes, etc. We require three professional references from candidates at the preliminary interview. We perform credit and criminal background checks on candidates after the second interview per our corporate security policy. No phone calls or visits without prior invitation. Absolutely no agents or third party inquiries. If you're interested, e-mail your resume and a cover letter introducing yourself to job-6343 at webcdr.com. -- Earl Ruby http://earlruby.org/ @earlruby From doomvox at gmail.com Wed Jan 4 14:08:05 2012 From: doomvox at gmail.com (Joseph Brenner) Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:08:05 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] #code2011 on twitter In-Reply-To: <1325548673.15381.140661018480085@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1325548673.15381.140661018480085@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: Well, if you consider ruby and php as "perl-derived languages", then the perl family would get: 30 + 29 + 14 = 73 easily beating-out the java and javascript worlds. (I wonder who the poor sucker was using pascal. That was probably a joke.) On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Philip J. Hollenback wrote: > Tracking the languages people claimed they used in 2011: > > http://code2011.hybridgroup.com/ > > so apparently I need to write some javascript to get with the program. > > (I know this is baloney and it only checks the last 100 tweets with the > #code2011 tag) > > P. > -- > Philip J. Hollenback > philiph at pobox.com > www.hollenback.net > > _______________________________________________ > SanFrancisco-pm mailing list > SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From biztos at mac.com Thu Jan 5 04:44:42 2012 From: biztos at mac.com (Kevin Frost) Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:44:42 +0100 Subject: [sf-perl] #code2011 on twitter In-Reply-To: References: <1325548673.15381.140661018480085@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: <9E29F5C7-B5AE-4587-988D-DE4D57C2B83D@mac.com> Isn't it a little odd that they don't keep *all* the results, and build a much more interesting data set? Clearly these are not Perl Hackers. ;-) I like that Perl is currently scoring higher than Objective C... as far as I can tell everybody and their puppy is writing an iPhone app right now. Seriously though, it would be cool to do this kind of thing longer-term, with better data collection and other visualizations. I hope somebody does; my side-project queue is too full right now. -- f. On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:08 PM, Joseph Brenner wrote: > Well, if you consider ruby and php as "perl-derived languages", then the perl family would get: > > 30 + 29 + 14 = 73 > > easily beating-out the java and javascript worlds. > > (I wonder who the poor sucker was using pascal. That was probably a joke.) > > > On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Philip J. Hollenback wrote: > Tracking the languages people claimed they used in 2011: > > http://code2011.hybridgroup.com/ > > so apparently I need to write some javascript to get with the program. > > (I know this is baloney and it only checks the last 100 tweets with the > #code2011 tag) > > P. > -- > Philip J. Hollenback > philiph at pobox.com > www.hollenback.net > > _______________________________________________ > SanFrancisco-pm mailing list > SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm > > _______________________________________________ > SanFrancisco-pm mailing list > SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From philiph at pobox.com Fri Jan 6 12:16:11 2012 From: philiph at pobox.com (Philip J. Hollenback) Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:16:11 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] ugh another knock on perl Message-ID: <1325880971.6362.140661020187509@webmail.messagingengine.com> That stupid study about how perl is worse than random syntax is popping up all over the place: http://www.fastcodesign.com/1665735/why-arent-computer-programming-languages-designed-better -- Philip J. Hollenback philiph at pobox.com www.hollenback.net From biztos at mac.com Fri Jan 6 14:35:09 2012 From: biztos at mac.com (Kevin Frost) Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:35:09 +0100 Subject: [sf-perl] ugh another knock on perl In-Reply-To: <1325880971.6362.140661020187509@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1325880971.6362.140661020187509@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: <4D919162-5D82-452C-A24A-7C92BCBBB96E@mac.com> And of course his example of Perl is this: for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { } I can never tell whether "int" is random syntax or whether I'm speaking the wrong $LANGUAGE. On Jan 6, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Philip J. Hollenback wrote: > That stupid study about how perl is worse than random syntax is popping > up all over the place: > > http://www.fastcodesign.com/1665735/why-arent-computer-programming-languages-designed-better > -- > Philip J. Hollenback > philiph at pobox.com > www.hollenback.net > > _______________________________________________ > SanFrancisco-pm mailing list > SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm From philiph at pobox.com Fri Jan 6 14:41:11 2012 From: philiph at pobox.com (Philip J. Hollenback) Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 14:41:11 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] ugh another knock on perl In-Reply-To: <4D919162-5D82-452C-A24A-7C92BCBBB96E@mac.com> References: <1325880971.6362.140661020187509@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4D919162-5D82-452C-A24A-7C92BCBBB96E@mac.com> Message-ID: <1325889671.6476.140661020235045@webmail.messagingengine.com> I agree, it's a terrible example (and several commenters on the article point that out). Even though I haven't written any C in 10 years or so I still cringe every time I see one of those. On Fri, Jan 6, 2012, at 11:35 PM, Kevin Frost wrote: > And of course his example of Perl is this: > > for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { > } > > I can never tell whether "int" is random syntax or whether I'm speaking > the wrong $LANGUAGE. > > > On Jan 6, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Philip J. Hollenback wrote: > > > That stupid study about how perl is worse than random syntax is popping > > up all over the place: > > > > http://www.fastcodesign.com/1665735/why-arent-computer-programming-languages-designed-better > > -- > > Philip J. Hollenback > > philiph at pobox.com > > www.hollenback.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SanFrancisco-pm mailing list > > SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm > > -- Philip J. Hollenback philiph at pobox.com www.hollenback.net From biztos at mac.com Fri Jan 6 15:15:00 2012 From: biztos at mac.com (Kevin Frost) Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:15:00 +0100 Subject: [sf-perl] ugh another knock on perl In-Reply-To: <1325889671.6476.140661020235045@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1325880971.6362.140661020187509@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4D919162-5D82-452C-A24A-7C92BCBBB96E@mac.com> <1325889671.6476.140661020235045@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: <0934E9F8-2B4D-44D8-9BD6-C6840FEE0A89@mac.com> I was sort of kidding, and while I think the author of that piece is far, far out of his depth, there's another side that I find interesting. Leaving aside the question of whether Perl is cruftier than Python or Javascript is scarier than Obj-C or whatever, I believe there really is an aesthetic sensibility in favor of more expressive versus more natural-sounding computer language. (I say "natural-sounding" on purpose; I don't think there is such a thing as "natural-looking" instructions for a computer.) A lot of people think it's better if it sounds more like a natural language: "repeat ten times!" "YOU HAVE TEN SECONDS TO COMPLY!" But a lot of other people can "speak computer" well enough to understand how limiting it is to declare it all in English, and presumably as a result of their fluency they have an aesthetic preference for a "foreach" or whatever. For instance I think this bit of Ruby is super cool and very powerfully expressive: (1..10).each do|n| puts "number #{n}" end I don't speak Ruby, but I speak "computer" well enough to quickly grasp what the |n| is about, and I like the sound of it. It tells me a lot, and doesn't beat around the bush. Probably everyone on this list understands that you can "do" more this way, but my point is that I think with experience you have an actual aesthetic feel for it, and it feels better. Of course, as with natural languages, not everyone is going to agree on what feels best and why. I'm probably not going to convince you that Hungarian sounds better than French, but to me it does. Arguing that English codes better than code is more like saying Pig Latin sounds better than French... there might be someone for whom that is true, but would you want to have unch-lay with them? cheers -- f. On Jan 6, 2012, at 11:41 PM, Philip J. Hollenback wrote: > I agree, it's a terrible example (and several commenters on the article > point that out). Even though I haven't written any C in 10 years or so > I still cringe every time I see one of those. > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012, at 11:35 PM, Kevin Frost wrote: >> And of course his example of Perl is this: >> >> for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { >> } >> >> I can never tell whether "int" is random syntax or whether I'm speaking >> the wrong $LANGUAGE. >> >> >> On Jan 6, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Philip J. Hollenback wrote: >> >>> That stupid study about how perl is worse than random syntax is popping >>> up all over the place: >>> >>> http://www.fastcodesign.com/1665735/why-arent-computer-programming-languages-designed-better >>> -- >>> Philip J. Hollenback >>> philiph at pobox.com >>> www.hollenback.net >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SanFrancisco-pm mailing list >>> SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org >>> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm >> >> > -- > Philip J. Hollenback > philiph at pobox.com > www.hollenback.net > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From josh at agliodbs.com Fri Jan 6 18:24:35 2012 From: josh at agliodbs.com (Josh Berkus) Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:24:35 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] [OT] Looking for passenger to SCALE 10X Message-ID: <4F07ACE3.10706@agliodbs.com> SF Geeks: I'm driving down to SCALE in Los Angeles, leaving on January 19 and returning on January 23. I'm looking for someone to be a passenger, ideally a geek who's going to SCALE but I'll take any good conversationalist. No charge; I'm basically looking for someone to change CDs and keep me awake. I can also get you into the conference if you're willing/able to do 4 hours of booth duty in the PostgreSQL booth. It is only $100 to attend, though. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com From greg at blekko.com Fri Jan 6 22:10:29 2012 From: greg at blekko.com (Greg Lindahl) Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 22:10:29 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] ugh another knock on perl In-Reply-To: <1325889671.6476.140661020235045@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1325880971.6362.140661020187509@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4D919162-5D82-452C-A24A-7C92BCBBB96E@mac.com> <1325889671.6476.140661020235045@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: <20120107061029.GB3901@bx9.net> Best of all was the most-well-designed language for novices: integer i = 0 repeat 10 times i = i + 1 end A return to COBOL in begin comp-sci classes? On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 02:41:11PM -0800, Philip J. Hollenback wrote: > I agree, it's a terrible example (and several commenters on the article > point that out). Even though I haven't written any C in 10 years or so > I still cringe every time I see one of those. > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012, at 11:35 PM, Kevin Frost wrote: > > And of course his example of Perl is this: > > > > for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { > > } > > > > I can never tell whether "int" is random syntax or whether I'm speaking > > the wrong $LANGUAGE. > > > > > > On Jan 6, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Philip J. Hollenback wrote: > > > > > That stupid study about how perl is worse than random syntax is popping > > > up all over the place: > > > > > > http://www.fastcodesign.com/1665735/why-arent-computer-programming-languages-designed-better > > > -- > > > Philip J. Hollenback > > > philiph at pobox.com > > > www.hollenback.net > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > SanFrancisco-pm mailing list > > > SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org > > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm > > > > > -- > Philip J. Hollenback > philiph at pobox.com > www.hollenback.net > > _______________________________________________ > SanFrancisco-pm mailing list > SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm From philiph at pobox.com Thu Jan 12 16:51:55 2012 From: philiph at pobox.com (Philip J. Hollenback) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:51:55 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] Perl training Message-ID: <1326415915.24666.140661022768933@webmail.messagingengine.com> The group I manage at work does a lot of bash scripting, and I'm trying to get everyone trained up on Perl. We have some classes at work, and of course there are the UCSC extension courses. Can anyone suggest any other good perl training resources in SF or the south bay? I'm looking for something I can send someone to for a few months in the evenings or something like that. Thanks, P. -- Philip J. Hollenback philiph at pobox.com www.hollenback.net From mkenley at yahoo.com Thu Jan 12 17:10:43 2012 From: mkenley at yahoo.com (martin) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:10:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: [sf-perl] Perl training In-Reply-To: <1326415915.24666.140661022768933@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1326415915.24666.140661022768933@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: <1326417043.89728.YahooMailNeo@web39403.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Foothill college offers Perl courses and the prices are very reasonable.? I took a beginning course there that was very good. Martin Kenley ________________________________ From: Philip J. Hollenback To: sanfrancisco-pm at pm.org Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 4:51 PM Subject: [sf-perl] Perl training The group I manage at work does a lot of bash scripting, and I'm trying to get everyone trained up on Perl.? We have some classes at work, and of course there are the UCSC extension courses. Can anyone suggest any other good perl training resources in SF or the south bay?? I'm looking for something I can send someone to for a few months in the evenings or something like that. Thanks, P. --? Philip J. Hollenback philiph at pobox.com www.hollenback.net _______________________________________________ SanFrancisco-pm mailing list SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rdm at cfcl.com Thu Jan 12 17:28:47 2012 From: rdm at cfcl.com (Rich Morin) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:28:47 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] Perl training In-Reply-To: <1326415915.24666.140661022768933@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1326415915.24666.140661022768933@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: At 4:51 PM -0800 1/12/12, Philip J. Hollenback wrote: > The group I manage at work does a lot of bash scripting, > and I'm trying to get everyone trained up on Perl. We > have some classes at work, and of course there are the > UCSC extension courses. Assuming your training rooms aren't full, you might want to consider inviting would-be Perlies to attend. This could benefit them, your company, and the Perl community. -r -- http://www.cfcl.com/rdm Rich Morin http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume rdm at cfcl.com http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/weblog +1 650-873-7841 Software system design, development, and documentation From rdm at cfcl.com Fri Jan 13 11:53:51 2012 From: rdm at cfcl.com (Rich Morin) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:53:51 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] organizations with local data centers? Message-ID: I'm working on a notion regarding data center management. I'd like to find some organizations with local data centers, so that I can talk to them about use cases, look over their server rooms, and possibly do some free trial runs. To avoid filling up the list, please send any suggestions directly to me. -r -- http://www.cfcl.com/rdm Rich Morin http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume rdm at cfcl.com http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/weblog +1 650-873-7841 Software system design, development, and documentation From doomvox at gmail.com Thu Jan 19 11:24:19 2012 From: doomvox at gmail.com (Joseph Brenner) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:24:19 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] perl6 humor Message-ID: And now, courtesy of perlmonks "meditations" we have another entry in the genre of vicious perl6 humor: http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=946630 Someone should put together a collection of these things. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From doom at kzsu.stanford.edu Thu Jan 19 11:25:00 2012 From: doom at kzsu.stanford.edu (Joseph Brenner) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:25:00 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] perl6 humor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: And now, courtesy of perlmonks "meditations" we have another entry in the genre of vicious perl6 humor: http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=946630 Someone should put together a collection of these things. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From frimicc at gmail.com Mon Jan 23 00:48:34 2012 From: frimicc at gmail.com (Michael Friedman) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:48:34 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] Is there a January meeting? Message-ID: By my calculation I think we should have a SFPM meeting on Tuesday, but I haven't seen any notice of a meeting. Are we skipping January this year or was it moved to a week later? -- Mike Friedman From doomvox at gmail.com Mon Jan 23 11:29:12 2012 From: doomvox at gmail.com (Joseph Brenner) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:29:12 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] Is there a January meeting? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Michael Friedman wrote: > By my calculation I think we should have a SFPM meeting on Tuesday, but I > haven't seen any notice of a meeting. Are we skipping January this year or > was it moved to a week later? > > Yes, you're quite right, sorry about that. We weren't successful in turning up a speaker for this month, so we're just going to be gathering at Naan & Curry on O'Farrell street. We should get out an Official Announcement about it today. Y'all know the N&C drill at this point, right? It's not far from the Powell station, just go up Powell a few blocks, and turn left on O'Farrell, Naan & Curry is on the right, between Mason & Taylor. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From doom at kzsu.stanford.edu Mon Jan 23 12:00:26 2012 From: doom at kzsu.stanford.edu (Joseph Brenner) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:00:26 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] Is there a January meeting? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Michael Friedman wrote: > By my calculation I think we should have a SFPM meeting on Tuesday, but I > haven't seen any notice of a meeting. Are we skipping January this year or > was it moved to a week later? > > Yes, you're quite right, sorry about that. We weren't successful in turning up a speaker for this month, so we're just going to be gathering at Naan & Curry on O'Farrell street. We should get out an Official Announcement about it today. Y'all know the N&C drill at this point, right? It's not far from the Powell station, just go up Powell a few blocks, and turn left on O'Farrell, Naan & Curry is on the right, between Mason & Taylor. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fred at redhotpenguin.com Mon Jan 23 12:17:41 2012 From: fred at redhotpenguin.com (Fred Moyer) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:17:41 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] Is there a January meeting? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8316ED9B0FD44C6B95CF8F3179EC01B5@redhotpenguin.com> On Monday, January 23, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Joseph Brenner wrote: > Michael Friedman wrote: > > By my calculation I think we should have a SFPM meeting on Tuesday, but I haven't seen any notice of a meeting. Are we skipping January this year or was it moved to a week later? > > > Yes, you're quite right, sorry about that. My bad, I had the meeting announcement on my todo list but didn't get to it. Naan and curry tomorrow evening at 7pm! > > We weren't successful in turning up a speaker for this month, so we're just going to be gathering at Naan & Curry on O'Farrell street. We should get out an Official Announcement about it today. > > Y'all know the N&C drill at this point, right? It's not far from the Powell station, just go up Powell a few blocks, and turn left on O'Farrell, Naan & Curry is on the right, between Mason & Taylor. > > _______________________________________________ > SanFrancisco-pm mailing list > SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org (mailto:SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org) > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm From philiph at pobox.com Wed Jan 25 19:17:25 2012 From: philiph at pobox.com (Philip J. Hollenback) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:17:25 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] Sending mime attachments with perl Message-ID: <1327547845.27298.140661028129193@webmail.messagingengine.com> Another of my sporadic blog posts. This time I stumble down the path of sending mime attachments via a perl script. http://www.hollenback.net/index.php/SendMimeWithPerl I probably have too much time on my hands or something. P. -- Philip J. Hollenback philiph at pobox.com www.hollenback.net From fobispo at isc.org Wed Jan 25 19:37:26 2012 From: fobispo at isc.org (Francisco Obispo) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:37:26 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] Sending mime attachments with perl In-Reply-To: <1327547845.27298.140661028129193@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1327547845.27298.140661028129193@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: <373403F8-3F99-45FA-9998-235AACFF4391@isc.org> I've been using MIME::Lite::TT::HTML with great results.. and it's very very easy to use.. my $msg = MIME::Lite::TT::HTML->new( From => 'Test Email ', To => 'destinationemail at domain.tld', Subject => 'This is the subject', Template => { text => 'text-email.tt', html => 'html-email.tt', }, TmplOptions => \%options, TmplParams => $args, ); $msg->send; that's all? On Jan 25, 2012, at 7:17 PM, Philip J. Hollenback wrote: > Another of my sporadic blog posts. This time I stumble down the path of > sending mime attachments via a perl script. > > http://www.hollenback.net/index.php/SendMimeWithPerl > > I probably have too much time on my hands or something. > > P. > -- > Philip J. Hollenback > philiph at pobox.com > www.hollenback.net > > _______________________________________________ > SanFrancisco-pm mailing list > SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm From philiph at pobox.com Wed Jan 25 23:48:19 2012 From: philiph at pobox.com (Philip J. Hollenback) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:48:19 -0800 Subject: [sf-perl] Sending mime attachments with perl In-Reply-To: <373403F8-3F99-45FA-9998-235AACFF4391@isc.org> References: <1327547845.27298.140661028129193@webmail.messagingengine.com> <373403F8-3F99-45FA-9998-235AACFF4391@isc.org> Message-ID: <1327564099.12538.140661028188397@webmail.messagingengine.com> Hey, great point. That makes it super easy to do html and text! In my blog post I was just concentrating on the somewhat arbitrary goal of creating an email with a text attachment. On Wed, Jan 25, 2012, at 07:37 PM, Francisco Obispo wrote: > I've been using MIME::Lite::TT::HTML with great results.. and it's very > very easy to use.. > > my $msg = MIME::Lite::TT::HTML->new( > From => 'Test Email ', > To => 'destinationemail at domain.tld', > Subject => 'This is the subject', > Template => { > text => 'text-email.tt', > html => 'html-email.tt', > }, > TmplOptions => \%options, > TmplParams => $args, > ); > > $msg->send; > > > that's all? > > > On Jan 25, 2012, at 7:17 PM, Philip J. Hollenback wrote: > > > Another of my sporadic blog posts. This time I stumble down the path of > > sending mime attachments via a perl script. > > > > http://www.hollenback.net/index.php/SendMimeWithPerl > > > > I probably have too much time on my hands or something. > > > > P. > > -- > > Philip J. Hollenback > > philiph at pobox.com > > www.hollenback.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SanFrancisco-pm mailing list > > SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm > -- Philip J. Hollenback philiph at pobox.com www.hollenback.net From mgrimes at cpan.org Thu Jan 26 05:22:12 2012 From: mgrimes at cpan.org (Mark Grimes) Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:22:12 -0500 Subject: [sf-perl] Sending mime attachments with perl In-Reply-To: <373403F8-3F99-45FA-9998-235AACFF4391@isc.org> References: <1327547845.27298.140661028129193@webmail.messagingengine.com> <373403F8-3F99-45FA-9998-235AACFF4391@isc.org> Message-ID: Nice write-up. The command line tool looks very useful. Another nice package for complex emails is Ricardo Signes' Email::MIME::Kit. I've used it successfully on a couple of projects. He did a post about it a few years ago for his advent calendar (http://advent.rjbs.manxome.org/2009/2009-12-10.html). It supports a number of different templating options (TT, Mason, etc). On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Francisco Obispo wrote: > I've been using MIME::Lite::TT::HTML with great results.. and it's very very easy to use.. > > ?my $msg = MIME::Lite::TT::HTML->new( > ? ?From => 'Test Email ', > ? ?To ? ? ?=> 'destinationemail at domain.tld', > ? ?Subject => 'This is the subject', > ? ?Template => { > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?text => 'text-email.tt', > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?html => 'html-email.tt', > ? ?}, > ? ?TmplOptions => \%options, > ? ?TmplParams ?=> $args, > ?); > > ?$msg->send; > > > that's all? > > > On Jan 25, 2012, at 7:17 PM, Philip J. Hollenback wrote: > >> Another of my sporadic blog posts. ?This time I stumble down the path of >> sending mime attachments via a perl script. >> >> http://www.hollenback.net/index.php/SendMimeWithPerl >> >> I probably have too much time on my hands or something. >> >> P. >> -- >> Philip J. Hollenback >> philiph at pobox.com >> www.hollenback.net >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SanFrancisco-pm mailing list >> SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org >> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm > > _______________________________________________ > SanFrancisco-pm mailing list > SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm