[sf-perl] lack of perl in config management - problem?
Randal L. Schwartz
merlyn at stonehenge.com
Sat Dec 10 16:43:26 PST 2011
>>>>> "Philip" == Philip J Hollenback <philiph at pobox.com> writes:
Philip> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011, at 03:44 PM, Rich Morin wrote:
>> One question I'd have is whether Perl is as facile as Ruby at the
>> kinds of metaprogramming and internal DSL creation that (say) Chef
>> uses). If not, the result of a Perl rework might not be very pretty.
Philip> I agree - what is it about ruby that makes it so attractive for config
Philip> management? I know nothing about ruby at all.
The ruby config management grew out of the ruby-on-rails camp. Now that
RoR has lost some steam, I imagine the next big config thing won't be
ruby. In fact, "salt" looks like it has some steam (remote execution
based on zeromq). Too bad it's Python. :)
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
More information about the SanFrancisco-pm