[sf-perl] 100 levels deep in subroutine calls!

[Loo, Peter # PHX]

I am sorry.  I guess I am not understanding your question.  I am not
seeing the difference.
 
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Randal L. Schwartz [mailto:merlyn at stonehenge.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:42 AM
To: Loo, Peter # PHX
Cc: San Francisco Perl Mongers User Group
Subject: Re: [sf-perl] 100 levels deep in subroutine calls!

>>>>> "Loo," == Loo, Peter # PHX <Peter.Loo at source.wolterskluwer.com>
writes:

Loo,> Because I was getting a core dump right when the program attempted
to Loo,> connect at this very STEP, I wanted to see all the values of
the Loo,> variables so I was STEPPING through each row surrounding this
Loo,> connection.

This doesn't answer any of the questions I asked.  Not sure why you
responded to be with a non-responsive answer.  {sigh}

Half the battle of getting something solved is figuring out what you're
doing in the first case.

Repeating the most important question:

          WHY ARE YOU RECURSING INSTEAD OF ITERATING?

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777
0095 <merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl
training!


This E-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply E-mail, and
destroy all copies of the original message.