BPDG: Re: BPDG Report

[tom poe]

On Friday 31 May 2002 08:53, WJR74 at aol.com wrote:

> > Having watched this process over the past months, and as a veteran of
> numerous groups, committees, panels, etc. within CEA, SAE, CSA, IEC, UL,
> NEMA, EPRI, and numerous others, both consensus and otherwise, I have to
> agree with what I see as the closest thing to a true consensus that has
> come out of this process. This has not been a consensus process.

- - - snip - - -

Hello:  I believe Mr. Rose has put forth a most revealing and important 
observation, along with extremely relevant suggestions on how this process 
should proceed.  Rather than use it to clearly demonstrate the unprofessional 
and immature approach the conveners chose to pursue, these observations might 
better reflect how the process can be adjusted and progress from this point 
forward.

I applaud Mr. Rose's candor and professionalism, and look forward to the 
BPDG's response to his observations.  In particular, I would suggest that his 
message be forwarded directly to the individuals that received the May 
Report, and request it be placed on the site along with the May Report.
Respectfully,
Tom Poe
Reno, NV
http://www.studioforrecording.org/
http://www.ibiblio.org/studioforrecording/
http://renotahoe.pm.org/