[Raleigh-talk] Still stymied by BigInt inheritance.

Matt Nash mattnashbrowns at gmail.com
Sun Oct 9 12:04:55 PDT 2011


Why do you want IP::Address::Util to be a subclass of Math::BigInt? It would
seem to make more sense to have one or more object variables (members of
IP::Address::Util) which are references to Math::BigInt objects.


On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Paul Bennett <paul.w.bennett at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for Perl developers who know about inheriting from
> Math::BigInt::GMP and/or Math::BigInt::Pari to help me improve
> http://matrix.cpantesters.org/**?dist=Net-IPAddress-Util<http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=Net-IPAddress-Util>-- latest source is at
> http://code.google.com/p/perl-**ipaddress-simple/source/**
> browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Flib%**2FNet%2FIPAddress<http://code.google.com/p/perl-ipaddress-simple/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Flib%2FNet%2FIPAddress>
>
> I'm convinced I'm doing something obviously and stupidly wrong, but I can't
> for the life of me see the forest for the trees.
>
> --
> Paul
> ______________________________**_________________
> Raleigh-talk mailing list
> Raleigh-talk at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/**listinfo/raleigh-talk<http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/raleigh-talk>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/raleigh-talk/attachments/20111009/8667b3a0/attachment.html>


More information about the Raleigh-talk mailing list