[Phoenix-pm] Perl developer job

[David A. Sinck]

\_ SMTP quoth Brock on 4/19/2007 21:05 as having spake thusly:
\_
\_ On 2007.04.19.20.00, Lane Davis wrote:
\_ | 
\_ | Ah, 
\_ | 
\_ | Actually, the recruiter had (especially nicely) asked me not to say the name of
\_ | the company in the job posting, but.. at this stage it's too late and besides
\_ | nobody said any different.  Fair is fair I s'pose :-)

If I wasn't affiliated with said company, I probably wouldn't have
mentioned it.

\_ | 
\_ | -L
\_ 
\_ Ahh, the increasing danger that is the internets!

Or a local talent pool that all subscribes to the same groups/email lists.

\_ What would the motivation be for posting a job and not listing the name
\_ of the company? 

*We* did.  The recruiter is probably looking for a slice of the action
to get paid would be my guess.  If you're more comfortable letting
someone else negotiate your working terms, that's up to you.

\_ Seems to me you'd want to attract good programmers by
\_ going beyond the technical buzzwords and delving into the social,
\_ political, and philisopical interest one might have in working for them
\_ (beyond the taunting of the PHP lovers).

We have multiple shiny objects!  :-)

\_ Unless, I suppose, it isn't an interesting job :)
\_ 
\_ Maybe some sort of "stealth mode"?

Ha.  Hardly stealth.  Incentive Logic survived the 2000 .bomb and has
a full PR and HR approved website that will go into everything one
would want to know. 

As far as interesting, that all depends on the measuring stick you're
using, doesn't it?  :-)  

Besides working with me, what else could you want?  :-)

Cheers,


David