[Phoenix-pm] Meeting Agenda - meeting on July 28, 2005

Scott Walters scott at illogics.org
Fri Jul 22 16:43:36 PDT 2005


Okay, I'll get to work then! I'll make it short - 15 or 30 minutes. 
I'll get back to the list when I figure out exactly what Perl 6 related
thing I'm going to talk about, but it'll probably go one of two directions.

Brock, why don't you plan on doing your ICFP entry presentation next time?
I'm afraid I'm going to forget about a presentation... that would be bad.

-scott


On  0, Brock <awwaiid at thelackthereof.org> wrote:
> 
> OK, by my count we have 6 or 7 RSVPs, and there are always some straglers,
> so we're going to go ahead and use the library room (which I've already
> reserved anyway). It'll be a good test of the facilities too (I am still
> happy to hear about other ideas for locations, btw).
> 
> Main topics will be Perl6, lead by Scott (you can do Perl6::Contexts or
> whatever you like!), and Andrew will talk about POD.
> 
> Secondary topics proposed were Perl Best Practices, and I wanted to talk a
> bit about this year's ICFP contest. I'm not qualified to present more than
> random tidbits on Perl Best Practices, so perhaps using collective
> knowledge we can banter that around a bit after the POD and Perl6
> discussions. O'Reilly is sending us a copy of Perl Best Practices, btw,
> but I don't think it'll get here in time for this meeting.
> 
> To recap --
> 
> Phoenix.pm Meeting
> Topics: POD, Perl6(::Contexts)?, Perl Best Practices
> Time: July 28, 2005 @7:00pm
> Location: Scottsdale Public Library, Civic Center, Silver Room
>           3839 N. Drinkwater Blvd.
>           Scottsdale, AZ 85251-4467
>           http://library.scottsdaleaz.gov/
> Map: http://maps.google.com/maps?q=library+civic+center+scottsdale,+az&num=1
> 
> See you there!
> --Brock
> 
> > I'm going to let Brock do the decision making, but as a recap, POD is a
> > good
> > idea, someone else offered to do something (I forget just what, I'm
> > sorry),
> > and there are a few votes of Perl 6 related stuff.  I see nothing wrong
> > with
> > having three presentations, assuming the presenters can decide how much
> > time they
> > want to be clamped down to and someone has a stopwatch.
> >
> > -scott
> >
> > On  0, Frooninckx Craig - cfroon <Craig.Frooninckx at acxiom.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>    Hi guys,  just curious if we have an agenda for next Thursday and a
> >>    list of who is presenting.
> >>
> >>    **********************************************************************
> >>    The information contained in this communication is
> >>    confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
> >>    named above, and may be legally privileged.
> >>    If the reader of this message is not the intended
> >>    recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> >>    distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
> >>    prohibited.
> >>    If you have received this communication in error,
> >>    please re-send this communication to the sender and
> >>    delete the original message or any copy of it from your
> >>    computer system. Thank You.
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Phoenix-pm mailing list
> >> Phoenix-pm at pm.org
> >> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/phoenix-pm
> > _______________________________________________
> > Phoenix-pm mailing list
> > Phoenix-pm at pm.org
> > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/phoenix-pm
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Phoenix-pm mailing list
> Phoenix-pm at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/phoenix-pm


More information about the Phoenix-pm mailing list