[Pdx-pm] No recruiters, please?

alan alan at clueserver.org
Mon Jun 18 16:47:28 PDT 2007

On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:

>>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Wilhelm <scratchcomputing at gmail.com> writes:
> Eric> Well, sort of.  I think any objections to a given recruiter means they
> Eric> can find their own venue whether they've got beer or not.  Thus,
> Eric> they're still in the "better ask first" category, (rather than some
> Eric> random recruiter showing up and expecting to get the floor to recruit
> Eric> for doTnet jobs just because they bought us a five pack.)
> We'd also not want 10 recruiters all showing up the same night, providing
> enough food and drink to feed a small army, only to consume 30 minutes of
> otherwise valuable python-bashing time. :)

Or having them bring cheap pizza or a small bag of potato chips...

"ANSI C says access to the padding fields of a struct is undefined.
ANSI C also says that struct assignment is a memcpy. Therefore struct
assignment in ANSI C is a violation of ANSI C..."
                                   - Alan Cox

More information about the Pdx-pm-list mailing list