[Pdx-pm] Lisp class
Michael G Schwern
schwern at pobox.com
Sun May 1 01:01:32 PDT 2005
Thus spake Randal Lucas
> I will soon have surpassed that age at which Paul Graham asserts one
> must have learned Common Lisp or have missed one's chance.
The idea what one must learn big, new ideas before a certain age when your
brain meats harden and become forever crystalized against new ideas like
some sort of Magic Shell sundae topping is, imo, a load of crap.
That said, I think what to pull out of Paul Graham's Lisp assertion is not
so much about Lisp persay but about functional programming. You should
learn it. Its a whole new (actually rather old) way of looking at
programming much like OO is different from procedural. But it doesn't
have to be Lisp. Recently Haskell  has gotten a lot of attention and
unlike Lisp it reflects up-to-date functional programming theory and seems
to have solved many of the traditional programming pains of functional code.
More importantly Pugs , the prototype Perl 6 interpreter, is being
written in Haskell. You can learn Haskell and still keep generally within
the same community as Perl and work on Perl 6 all at the same time! There's
bushels of low hanging fruit in Pugs such that anyone with a few weeks
(hell, days) of Haskell under their belt can start doing some patching.
I believe the Pugs folks recommend "The Haskell School of Expression" or
"Algorithms: A Functional Progamming Approach" as well as the online "Yet
Another Haskell Tutorial".
Finally, to shamelessly plug Curtis' talk this month, he will be speaking on
Prolog which is a representative of yet another entirely different way of
programming: logic programming.
More information about the Pdx-pm-list