[Pdx-pm] Testing demo ideas
tex at off.org
Mon Sep 13 12:42:58 CDT 2004
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:38:57AM -0700, Austin Schutz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 09:24:01AM -0700, Ovid wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Also, I prefer working with object oriented code, but I also realize that some of you may have no
> > experience there and throwing too many things at you at once may confuse things (which is one of
> > the reasons I won't be using Class::MethodMaker.) OO Perl is ridiculously simple, but that could
> > just be my perspective. Does anyone have strong feelings on this matter?
> It would be great to see some sort of cgi testing, database testing,
> and/or a combination of the two. Sounds like you have something like that in
> mind. A "currency exchange" app would be fine if it tested elements that are
> generally a little trickier to test than ok( sqr(2), 4 );
> Anyway, that sort of testing would be of use to those of us who have
> been inspired by previous testing talks but aren't very good at it. :-)
It occurs to me that doesn't really answer the oo/non-oo question.
I guess as far as I'm concerned I don't care if the code is OO or not as
long as I can imagine how I would be able to implement testing in my own
work. So, if non-oo is the lowest common denominator that's ok w/ me.
More information about the Pdx-pm-list