-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Saw this on NetworkWorld...<br/>
<br/>
<a
href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/113005-perl-flaw.html">http://www.networkworld.com/news/2005/113005-perl-flaw.html</a><br/>
<br/>
It's too vaigue to help any, but it sounds like the classic use of
un-checked user input being executed directly by the interperter (Perl or
otherwise). <br/>
<br/>
Anyone heard anything more?<br/>
<br/>
Dan<br/>
<br/>
- - - - -<br/>
"Wait for that wisest of all counselors, time." -- Pericles<br/>
"I do not fear computers, I fear the lack of them." -- Isaac
Asimov<br/>
GPG fingerprint:6FFD DB94 7B96 0FD8 EADF 2EE0 B2B0 CC47 4FDE 9B68
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDji7LsrDMR0/em2gRAgjSAKC1RFU6ndhXc5iZNq4YrcpA5r0ERwCggn/3
Q3mwX13lUtqkRMepSk1DT6M=
=ogxg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----