[Omaha.pm] camel v. onion

[Jay Hannah]

FYI

j

> Jay Hannah wrote:
>> On Nov 10, 2005, at 1:15 PM, Dave Cross wrote:
>>> I haven't seen anyone objecting to the plan.
>> $0.02 --
>> I guess it doesn't matter, but I have a mild emotional/historical 
>> attachment to the camel and the onion means nothing* to me.
>> Since I've never seen any argument for leaving the camel all I see is 
>> a change for the sake of change, a phenom I routinely resist. If 
>> there's an argument somewhere I'd like to read it.
>> Anyway I won't denounce Perl/TPF/PM over it or cry or anything.
>
> The main argument is that the camel doesn't belong to us. It belongs 
> to O'Reilly. And whilst they've always been generous allowing us to 
> use it, that has permission has always come with restrictions. Makes 
> far more sense, to me at least, to create our own logo that we can use 
> wherever we want.
>
>> Is there a huge soft copy of that onion logo somewhere? I don't see a 
>> link to one on TPF website.
>
> Let me check that out and get back to you.
>
> Dave...