<b><i>David Fetter <david@fetter.org></i></b> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><david@fetter.org>You're mistaken on many, many different counts here. Every single one of them is what they call "sex positive" in the local jargon. There's a giant difference between porn and its variants and the work place, where that stuff is totally inappropriate. That the women I know who manage to stay in technology aren't thrilled about seeing yet another unimaginative objectification is not a giant surprise. Just getting through engineering school and being out in the workplace is enough to<span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span></span>cause a lot of them to have a pretty short fuse for this kind of nonsense.<br></david@fetter.org></blockquote><br>Ah, yes, "sex positive", another cute Bay Area PC term, just as codified as the laundry list of PC approved
sexual behavior that goes along with it. I wouldn't be surprised if Good Vibrations actually registers "sex positive" as a trademark. Talk about nonsense. You must be a big hit in Berkeley, David, you wield the jingoism quite readily.<br><br>Cheers,<br><br>Adrien<br><br><br><p> 
<hr size=1><a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=43256/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta"> All-new Yahoo! Mail </a>- Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.