[Mpls-pm] Another lightning talk note
Dave Rolsky
autarch at urth.org
Thu Nov 10 12:31:11 PST 2005
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Ian Malpass wrote:
> I don't have a problem with stricter time limits, as long as they're applied
> to the talks, and not the Q&A afterwards. Or, rather, as long as there's a
> separate time limit applied to the Q&A afterwards. And as long as people then
> keep their questions until the Q&A, rather than asking them mid-talk.
>
> I think for a lightning talk, keeping questions to the end probably wouldn't
> be difficult or bad. For something like the OOP talk I was supposed to give
> last night, it might be easier to allow for questions mid-stream rather than
> lose someone because the speaker explained something oddly.
I agree. I think queueing up questions would be a good practice.
-dave
/*===================================================
VegGuide.Org www.BookIRead.com
Your guide to all that's veg. My book blog
===================================================*/
More information about the Mpls-pm
mailing list