[Mpls-pm] Another lightning talk note
Dave Rolsky
autarch at urth.org
Thu Nov 10 12:02:08 PST 2005
So folks are doing a pretty bad job at keeping them down to 10 minutes or
so. I went way over in answering questions.
My question to the group is whether or not this is a problem. My personal
take on it is that I'd prefer people try to stick to a time limit, as it
encourages you to think more up front about what you want to say rather
than rambling cause you know you can go way over. I think it also
encourages presenters to limit the scope of their talks in a way that is
beneficial to the audience, since I think that the listeners will get more
from either very brief overviews or very narrowly focused in-depth looks
at something, rather than an overview that tries to cover everything with
some (but not enough) depth.
I was thinking of being more strict, and maybe even bringing a buzzer or
something like that. Thoughts on this?
-dave
/*===================================================
VegGuide.Org www.BookIRead.com
Your guide to all that's veg. My book blog
===================================================*/
More information about the Mpls-pm
mailing list