[mplspm]: Followup: module validity

[Chris Josephes]

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Ken Williams wrote:

> 
> On Friday, October 11, 2002, at 06:48  AM, Chris Josephes wrote:
> > I posted a message on comp.lang.perl.modules the other day (MSG ID
> > 5OLo9.629$YJ1.1334545 at ruti.visi.com),including a brief RFC, plus the POD
> > that comes with the main module of the software.
> >
> > There were no replies, but since it's a voluntary community I wasn't
> > expecting too much feedback.
> >
> > I think I'm going to try a couple of other forums for the heck of it, 
> > and
> > I'll probably post the code to CPAN this weekend.
> 
> Please consider:
> 
>   1) modules at perl.org - the official place you're supposed to discuss new 
> CPAN namespaces
> 
>   2) module-authors at perl.org - a good place to discuss the relationships 
> between your modules and existing CPAN ones.

Will do.

> 
> I do cringe at the idea of yet another templating module, and I suspect 
> you'll get various suggestions on either of those lists recommending 
> that you try to extend an existing module if none does what you need at 
> the moment.
> 

Noted.

I'll address this issue in the RFC, including comparisons to existing
modules.  If you want, I'll send a draft to mpls at pm.org for commentary,
suggestions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher Josephes    | http://www.visi.com/~cpj1
cpj1 at visi.com           |




--------------------------------------------------
Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list

To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo at pm.org
with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message.