<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<tt>yes - I have submitted actual bug-fixes and test cases (I know of a
couple of specific bugs), but they were rejected.<br>
<br>
I'm not particularly precious about any of my code - but I do use
nearly every extension in my own code, so not having them in the
mainline code simply means that I need to maintain a branch.<br>
<br>
Mathew<br>
</tt><br>
Matthew Robinson wrote:
<blockquote cite="midPine.LNX.4.61.0603090959220.3634@sweep.bur.st"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:leif.eriksen@hpa.com.au">leif.eriksen@hpa.com.au</a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The decision to create a new namespace has already been made for you by
the H::T developer - he doesn't want your extra features in his
namespace, so you need another.
Did he give a reason - I suspect he felt the new features didn't fit
with his idea of what H::T should do. The doco and design seem to
indicate they have refined H::T to be exactly what they want.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
In the past I have suggested changes, including patches, to the
HTML::Template module and had them rejected. However, don't be surprised
if some of your suggestions turn up in a future version of H::T as this
happened to me. I don't have a problem with this as I got the features I
wanted but it depends on how "precious" you are about your ideas.
Matt
_______________________________________________
Melbourne-pm mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Melbourne-pm@pm.org">Melbourne-pm@pm.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pm">http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/melbourne-pm</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>