[Melbourne-pm] named regexp matches ...

[Jacinta Richardson]

On 21/06/11 20:41, Malcolm Herbert wrote:
> OK, thanks - a bit later version than I was hoping ... might have to do
> it the boring old skool way ... :)
>
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:00 +1000, "David Warring"
> <david.warring at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Malcolm,
>> I think this came in with the work on named captures re-written regex
>> engine
>> in 5.10.0.

David is correct, all the new shiny stuff has been coming in since 5.10.  We're 
now up to 5.14.  I recommend upgrading if you can.  ;)

     J