From daveviner at yahoo.com Tue Aug 1 20:48:41 2006 From: daveviner at yahoo.com (Dave Viner) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 20:48:41 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] time conversion question In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20060728150152.04876418@peterbenjamin.com> References: <20060727053000.GA10558@mitch.veggiechinese.net> <20060727062606.GA7176@level22.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20060728150152.04876418@peterbenjamin.com> Message-ID: <26E3FA07-E8BA-42B2-B7C3-5A691C642934@yahoo.com> you might also check out the family of DateTime modules... http://datetime.perl.org/index.cgi?Modules not sure how they compare in terms of performance... but the information is quite extensive on date manipulations in perl. dave On Jul 28, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Peter Benjamin wrote: > > MySQL will reformat dates it outputs. > It has an extensive set of input and output formats. > And I've been told it is faster than perl's date handling. > > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm From naterajj at gmail.com Thu Aug 3 12:17:26 2006 From: naterajj at gmail.com (Juan Jose Natera) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:17:26 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] possible dates for my "Perl Best Practices" talk In-Reply-To: <86odv88jtn.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <86odv88jtn.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Message-ID: <349627440608031217w2d40b447l7047f386ffefc141@mail.gmail.com> Hello Everyone, Any chance this is going to happen? If Ticketmaster can't host it, can someone offer another venue? Thanks in advance, JJ On 29 Jul 2006 09:19:48 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > I'm in town from the 2nd to the 16th. If you can find a room for me, I'd be > happy to present "Perl Best Practices", an hour talk extracted from Damian's > book of the same name. Tuesdays would be best, as my Sunday and Monday nights > are spoken for (karaoke at www.sardosbar.com). > > -- > Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 > > Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. > See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > From merlyn at stonehenge.com Thu Aug 3 12:19:09 2006 From: merlyn at stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Date: 03 Aug 2006 12:19:09 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] possible dates for my "Perl Best Practices" talk In-Reply-To: <349627440608031217w2d40b447l7047f386ffefc141@mail.gmail.com> References: <86odv88jtn.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <349627440608031217w2d40b447l7047f386ffefc141@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <8664h9vd8y.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> >>>>> "Juan" == Juan Jose Natera writes: Juan> Any chance this is going to happen? Nobody has contacted me in private, if that's what you mean. Juan> If Ticketmaster can't host it, can someone offer another venue? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! From sean at testmethods.net Thu Aug 3 13:28:47 2006 From: sean at testmethods.net (Sean Gallagher) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:28:47 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] possible dates for my "Perl Best Practices" talk In-Reply-To: <8664h9vd8y.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <86odv88jtn.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <349627440608031217w2d40b447l7047f386ffefc141@mail.gmail.com> <8664h9vd8y.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Message-ID: On Aug 3, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > Nobody has contacted me Hi Randall. Sorry that no one has contacted you. Todd Cranson-Cuebas is the person who usually sets up the LA.pm events here at Ticketmaster. He is currently out of town on vacation. A talk on Perl Best Practices sounds great! I would be happy to take on the task of setting things up if you are still available to speak. I have booked the screening room here at Ticketmaster for Tuesday, 8/8, from 7-9PM. (tentative until I hear back from you) Please let me know if that will work for you and I will then confirm by sending another email to the LA.pm group. Thanks! --Sean Sean Gallagher sean at testmethods.net From merlyn at stonehenge.com Thu Aug 3 13:33:51 2006 From: merlyn at stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Date: 03 Aug 2006 13:33:51 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] possible dates for my "Perl Best Practices" talk In-Reply-To: References: <86odv88jtn.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <349627440608031217w2d40b447l7047f386ffefc141@mail.gmail.com> <8664h9vd8y.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Message-ID: <86hd0ttv80.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> >>>>> "Sean" == Sean Gallagher writes: Sean> I have booked the screening room here at Ticketmaster for Tuesday, 8/8, Sean> from 7-9PM. (tentative until I hear back from you) Apparently, Westlake.PM has gotten to me first. the date is the 9th at valueclick. Details to follow. I know that's a bit far for some of you. Start earlier. :) :) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! From rspier at pobox.com Sat Aug 5 21:15:17 2006 From: rspier at pobox.com (Robert Spier) Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 21:15:17 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] possible dates for my "Perl Best Practices" talk In-Reply-To: <86hd0ttv80.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <86odv88jtn.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <349627440608031217w2d40b447l7047f386ffefc141@mail.gmail.com> <8664h9vd8y.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <86hd0ttv80.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Message-ID: > Sean> I have booked the screening room here at Ticketmaster for Tuesday, 8/8, > Sean> from 7-9PM. (tentative until I hear back from you) > > Apparently, Westlake.PM has gotten to me first. the date is the 9th at > valueclick. Details to follow. > > I know that's a bit far for some of you. Start earlier. :) :) Have you *seen* the 101 West during the evening rush hour? -R From mackenziemikebus at yahoo.com Tue Aug 8 12:24:37 2006 From: mackenziemikebus at yahoo.com (Mike MacKenzie) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [LA.pm] possible dates for my "Perl Best Practices" talk In-Reply-To: <86hd0ttv80.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Message-ID: <20060808192437.91914.qmail@web52203.mail.yahoo.com> The talk is tomorrow, right? Do you have any additional information to share with us so those of us who are interested might attend? Thanks, Mike MacKenzie --- "Randal L. Schwartz" wrote: > >>>>> "Sean" == Sean Gallagher writes: > > Sean> I have booked the screening room here at Ticketmaster for Tuesday, 8/8, > Sean> from 7-9PM. (tentative until I hear back from you) > > Apparently, Westlake.PM has gotten to me first. the date is the 9th at > valueclick. Details to follow. > > I know that's a bit far for some of you. Start earlier. :) :) > > -- > Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 > > Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. > See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From naterajj at gmail.com Tue Aug 8 12:30:44 2006 From: naterajj at gmail.com (Juan Jose Natera) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:30:44 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] possible dates for my "Perl Best Practices" talk In-Reply-To: <20060808192437.91914.qmail@web52203.mail.yahoo.com> References: <86hd0ttv80.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <20060808192437.91914.qmail@web52203.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <349627440608081230k17bbf2d1s3f12cabf2b48450a@mail.gmail.com> Hi, Unfortunately it seems Randal had to cancel, though it is not confirmed: http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/thousand-oaks-pm/2006-August/000314.html It seems ThousandOaks.pm will meet regardless, but I don't know if there will be any presentations. Juan Natera On 8/8/06, Mike MacKenzie wrote: > The talk is tomorrow, right? Do you have any additional information to share > with us so those of us who are interested might attend? > > Thanks, > > Mike MacKenzie > > --- "Randal L. Schwartz" wrote: > > > >>>>> "Sean" == Sean Gallagher writes: > > > > Sean> I have booked the screening room here at Ticketmaster for Tuesday, 8/8, > > Sean> from 7-9PM. (tentative until I hear back from you) > > > > Apparently, Westlake.PM has gotten to me first. the date is the 9th at > > valueclick. Details to follow. > > > > I know that's a bit far for some of you. Start earlier. :) :) > > > > -- > > Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 > > > > Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. > > See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! > > _______________________________________________ > > Losangeles-pm mailing list > > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > From merlyn at stonehenge.com Tue Aug 8 12:31:27 2006 From: merlyn at stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Date: 08 Aug 2006 12:31:27 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] possible dates for my "Perl Best Practices" talk In-Reply-To: <20060808192437.91914.qmail@web52203.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20060808192437.91914.qmail@web52203.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <86psfbc9dc.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> >>>>> "Mike" == Mike MacKenzie writes: Mike> The talk is tomorrow, right? Do you have any additional information to Mike> share with us so those of us who are interested might attend? No, this talk was cancelled. However, I'm in negotiation to do the same talk at Ticketmaster for LA.pm next tuesday. Details forthcoming (nudge nudge). -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! From Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com Tue Aug 8 15:50:27 2006 From: Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com (Todd Cranston-Cuebas) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:50:27 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] LA.pm Tech Talk - Randal Schwartz's Best Practices and Inside-Out Objects Message-ID: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D403540@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Announcing the Next LA.pm Tech Talk! Randal Schwartz will present 2 different talks from 7-9 p.m. Plan to stay afterward to get a bite in a local restaurant. Date: Tuesday, August 15th Location: Ticketmaster 8800 W. Sunset Blvd. West Hollywood, CA 90069 Talk number 1 from roughly 7 - 8 p.m. (arrive on time!). Perl Best Practices Randal Schwartz presents an excerpt from Damian Conway's book of the same name, including some practical examples. And from 8-9 p.m. Inside-out Objects Randal Schwartz provides insight and motivation into "inside out objects": a means to precisely control access to attributes and reduce the chance that a typo can mess up your day. Practical information you should know.... Please arrive a few minutes early if you can. I realize that traffic can be difficult in LA but since we have 2 back-to-back talks, Randal will start at 7:00 sharp. Ticketmaster is located on the southeast corner of Sunset Blvd. and Palm Avenue. At night, it is hard to see the 8800 number on our red brick building so be careful you don't drive past. Parking is off of Palm Avenue. Please see the map link below for our location. When you arrive, please pull into our parking structure below our building unless you like getting parking tickets ;) http://www.google.com/maps?f=q &hl=en&q=8800+w.+sunset+blvd.+west+hollywood,+ca&ie=UTF8&om=1&ll=34.092934,- 118.380542&spn=0.025482,0.054245 Also note that you must meet a Ticketmaster employee on the 1st floor. We will escort you to a conference room in our building for this event. RSVP Please Finally, if you plan to attend, please RSVP to the link below. It is very helpful for us to know how many people will arrive so we can make the necessary plans. http://www.evite.com/app/publicUrl/tcc at ticketmaster.com/techtalk081506 If you have any other questions, you can contact me directly. Todd Cranston-Cuebas 310-360-2436 tcc at ticketmaster.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/losangeles-pm/attachments/20060808/435ce2a5/attachment.html From naterajj at gmail.com Tue Aug 8 15:59:55 2006 From: naterajj at gmail.com (Juan Jose Natera) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 15:59:55 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] LA.pm Tech Talk - Randal Schwartz's Best Practices and Inside-Out Objects In-Reply-To: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D403540@pasmail3.office.tmcs> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D403540@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Message-ID: <349627440608081559r35763a35sced6188a8c032644@mail.gmail.com> This is good news, thanks! On 8/8/06, Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote: > Announcing the Next LA.pm Tech Talk! > > Randal Schwartz will present 2 different talks from 7-9 p.m. > Plan to stay afterward to get a bite in a local restaurant. From david at fetter.org Tue Aug 8 18:58:10 2006 From: david at fetter.org (David Fetter) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 18:58:10 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] [JOB] [Jstomel@oversee.net: Oversee.net (Sr. Perl Developer) -- Los Angeles] Message-ID: <20060809015810.GB31528@fetter.org> Folks, I neither know this person nor vouch for him, but I figured somebody might be interested. Contact him if you are :) Cheers, D ----- Forwarded message from "Josh S." ----- > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on fetter.org > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS, > FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=no version=3.1.3 > X-Original-To: david at fetter.org > Delivered-To: david at fetter.org > From: "Josh S." > To: David Fetter > Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:15:27 -0800 > Subject: Oversee.net (Sr. Perl Developer) -- Los Angeles > X-Mailer: XyberSleuth - TalentHook > X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at oversee.net > > > David > > Wanted to see if you may be able to assist me. (Came across an old resume of > yours) > > I am with Oversee.net (Located in Downtown Los Angeles) > > Anyways, I am looking to hire some extremely solid Perl / Mod_perl Developers. > > We are a completely privately held company. We have about 160 employees and > have been growing over the past few years. > > ** I have a .ppt about our business if you are interested.... > > Some of our premier .com's are; > > www.domainsponsor.com (Leader in Domain Monetization) > www.information.com > www.livedigital.com (Consumer Site) > www.compare.com (Coming soon) > www.low.com (Lead gen for Mortgage) > www.degrees.com (lead gen for .edu) > > We are doing some amazing things and we need some STRONG perl talent. > > Let me know if you may know anyone that may be interested! > > We are considering both FULL TIME AND CONTRACT!! However it needs to be in our San Mateo office or Los Angeles Office! > > > Josh Stomel > > > Josh Stomel | Business Development > Jstomel at oversee.net > Tel: 213.408.0072 > Fax: 213.892.1214 > YIM: TechRecruiter00 > > _________________________ > > Headquartered in Los Angeles, California, Oversee.net is a dynamic, growing > company with interests in multiple segments of the online media and > advertising space. It is the parent company of Revenue.net, a leading > online advertising network and domain monetization service that is built for > performance marketing. > > Oversee operates two lead generation businesses. Low.com is a leading > consumer financial services portal committed to helping users find the > lowest cost, most reputable purchase, refinance and home equity loans. They > connect highly-motivated consumers with financial institutions, resulting in > leads that generate among the highest percentage of closed loans in our > industry. Degrees.com offers lead generation opportunities for > post-secondary institutions, helping match students with the right school > and schools with the right students. > > The Company also owns premium consumer properties that include > Information.com, Newsalerts.com and Blogsource.com. > > > Oversee's Technical Team is seeking a senior-level Perl developer. This > position will focus on building clever, scalable, extensible, reliable web > applications and support frameworks. We need someone who will be creative > and thorough and takes great pride in creating the best possible systems for > continued development. We use mod_perl and HTML::Mason on Linux. > > Requirements: > >  4+ years of experience developing under mod_perl. >  Very strong Perl skills. Strong knowledge of OO concepts a must. >  Experience engineering large Perl software projects from modules to > scripts and web interfaces. >  HTML::Mason experience >  Experience with relational database and DBI >  MySQL experience is a plus. >  Strong Unix/Linux user skills. >  System administration experience is a plus. > > > Company Benefits > * Competitive salaries and generous bonus programs aligned with company > goals. > * Excellent Medical, Dental and Vision Insurance > * 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, and a Company Match > * Tuition Reimbursement > * Company paid short-term and long term disability > * Company paid group term life insurance > * Company Holidays and Paid Time Off (PTO) > * Gym membership > * Employee Referral Bonus > * Friendly work environment and flexible schedules > * Enjoy friendly competition in our game room > * Catered weekly lunches, complimentary soft drinks, Starbucks coffee, food > and snacks > > > To learn more, please visit us at http://www.oversee.net > > > Josh Stomel | Business Development > Jstomel at oversee.net > Tel: 213.408.0072 > Fax: 213.892.1214 > YIM: TechRecruiter00 > AIM: WcidUsa > Skype: JoshStomel > Professional Profile > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Properties > www.revenue.net > www.domainsponsor.com > www.blogsource.com > www.low.com > www.information.com > www.degrees.com > www.newsalerts.com > www.livedigital.com > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- -- David Fetter http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! From Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com Thu Aug 10 17:24:24 2006 From: Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com (Todd Cranston-Cuebas) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:24:24 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] As if you didn't know... Ticketmaster is looking for solid perl p eople ; ) Message-ID: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D40357E@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Since the topic came up, I thought I should point out that Ticketmaster is continuing to grow and is also looking for solid perl engineers. Basically, if you love perl, love the open-source development world, can code OO-perl, then we'll have a great place to work. I have positions on both our primary Ticketmaster.com development team and a position in our datawarehousing group. The main distinction between the roles is that the datawarehousing team is focusing on the applicant's ability to work with databases and data models and perl is secondary (although you will be working in perl). So, if you're a database wizard, consider this role and you can learn the perl on the job. If you're already a perl guru and looking to work for one of the coolest perl teams in town, then let me know. Drop me a note and we'll talk. Regards, Todd Todd Cranston-Cuebas Manager of Technical Recruiting Ticketmaster 8800 W. Sunset Blvd. West Hollywood, CA 90069 Phone: (310) 360-2436; Mobile: (310) 422-3347 tcc at ticketmaster.com Available Ticketmaster Positions Join the Ticketmaster Job Network! Your dream job is just a click away... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/losangeles-pm/attachments/20060810/69e4e201/attachment.html From lapm at veggiechinese.net Thu Aug 10 17:30:45 2006 From: lapm at veggiechinese.net (William Yardley) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:30:45 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] As if you didn't know... Ticketmaster is looking for solid perl p eople ; ) In-Reply-To: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D40357E@pasmail3.office.tmcs> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D40357E@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Message-ID: <20060811003045.GC21037@mitch.veggiechinese.net> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 05:24:24PM -0700, Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote: > Since the topic came up, I thought I should point out that Ticketmaster > is continuing to grow and is also looking for > solid perl engineers. What I want to see is a special deal where members of LAPM can get accounts that are free of Ticketmaster's surcharges! If anyone working for Ticketmaster can hook me up, hit me up off-list. (Bonus if we can also get exempted from the junk emails too) w From ask at develooper.com Thu Aug 10 19:54:20 2006 From: ask at develooper.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?=) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:54:20 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] As if you didn't know... Ticketmaster is looking for solid perl p eople ; ) In-Reply-To: <20060811003045.GC21037@mitch.veggiechinese.net> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D40357E@pasmail3.office.tmcs> <20060811003045.GC21037@mitch.veggiechinese.net> Message-ID: <4CC93424-9AAA-4858-A391-FD7D23F13E16@develooper.com> On Aug 10, 2006, at 5:30 PM, William Yardley wrote: If you take up Todd's offer and get a job there I'm pretty sure you'll be able to get tickets without the ticketing fees. :-) - ask From jeff at yoak.com Fri Aug 11 08:02:00 2006 From: jeff at yoak.com (Jeff Yoak) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:02:00 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] [JOB] [Jstomel@oversee.net: Oversee.net (Sr. Perl Developer) -- Los Angeles] In-Reply-To: <20060809015810.GB31528@fetter.org> References: <20060809015810.GB31528@fetter.org> Message-ID: <7.0.0.16.0.20060811075015.04ded2e0@tomorrowsearch.com> All, I don't know him either, but I know that company pretty well having built some of those systems. This guy must have come along after my vintage. The company is a solid one and a pretty good place to work. There are some really top tech people there which is always a pleasure. I'm still in touch with some of the technology decision-makers there so if any of you here that I know are thinking of applying, drop me a line and I'll see if I can move things along, pass the good word, etc. Cheers, Jeff At 06:58 PM 8/8/2006, David Fetter wrote: >Folks, > >I neither know this person nor vouch for him, but I figured somebody >might be interested. Contact him if you are :) > >Cheers, >D >----- Forwarded message from "Josh S." ----- > > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on fetter.org > > X-Spam-Level: > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.0 > tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS, > > FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=no version=3.1.3 > > X-Original-To: david at fetter.org > > Delivered-To: david at fetter.org > > From: "Josh S." > > To: David Fetter > > Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 15:15:27 -0800 > > Subject: Oversee.net (Sr. Perl Developer) -- Los Angeles > > X-Mailer: XyberSleuth - TalentHook > > X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at oversee.net > > > > > > David > > > > Wanted to see if you may be able to assist me. (Came across an > old resume of > > yours) > > > > I am with Oversee.net (Located in Downtown Los Angeles) > > > > Anyways, I am looking to hire some extremely solid Perl / > Mod_perl Developers. > > > > We are a completely privately held company. We have about 160 employees and > > have been growing over the past few years. > > > > ** I have a .ppt about our business if you are interested.... > > > > Some of our premier .com's are; > > > > www.domainsponsor.com (Leader in Domain Monetization) > > www.information.com > > www.livedigital.com (Consumer Site) > > www.compare.com (Coming soon) > > www.low.com (Lead gen for Mortgage) > > www.degrees.com (lead gen for .edu) > > > > We are doing some amazing things and we need some STRONG perl talent. > > > > Let me know if you may know anyone that may be interested! > > > > We are considering both FULL TIME AND CONTRACT!! However it needs > to be in our San Mateo office or Los Angeles Office! > > > > > > Josh Stomel > > > > > > Josh Stomel | Business Development > > Jstomel at oversee.net > > Tel: 213.408.0072 > > Fax: 213.892.1214 > > YIM: TechRecruiter00 > > > > _________________________ > > > > Headquartered in Los Angeles, California, Oversee.net is a dynamic, growing > > company with interests in multiple segments of the online media and > > advertising space. It is the parent company of Revenue.net, a leading > > online advertising network and domain monetization service that > is built for > > performance marketing. > > > > Oversee operates two lead generation businesses. Low.com is a leading > > consumer financial services portal committed to helping users find the > > lowest cost, most reputable purchase, refinance and home equity > loans. They > > connect highly-motivated consumers with financial institutions, > resulting in > > leads that generate among the highest percentage of closed loans in our > > industry. Degrees.com offers lead generation opportunities for > > post-secondary institutions, helping match students with the right school > > and schools with the right students. > > > > The Company also owns premium consumer properties that include > > Information.com, Newsalerts.com and Blogsource.com. > > > > > > Oversee's Technical Team is seeking a senior-level Perl developer. This > > position will focus on building clever, scalable, extensible, reliable web > > applications and support frameworks. We need someone who will be creative > > and thorough and takes great pride in creating the best possible > systems for > > continued development. We use mod_perl and HTML::Mason on Linux. > > > > Requirements: > > > > 4+ years of experience developing under mod_perl. > > Very strong Perl skills. Strong knowledge of OO concepts a must. > > Experience engineering large Perl software projects from modules to > > scripts and web interfaces. > > HTML::Mason experience > > Experience with relational database and DBI > > MySQL experience is a plus. > > Strong Unix/Linux user skills. > > System administration experience is a plus. > > > > > > Company Benefits > > * Competitive salaries and generous bonus programs aligned with company > > goals. > > * Excellent Medical, Dental and Vision Insurance > > * 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, and a Company Match > > * Tuition Reimbursement > > * Company paid short-term and long term disability > > * Company paid group term life insurance > > * Company Holidays and Paid Time Off (PTO) > > * Gym membership > > * Employee Referral Bonus > > * Friendly work environment and flexible schedules > > * Enjoy friendly competition in our game room > > * Catered weekly lunches, complimentary soft drinks, Starbucks > coffee, food > > and snacks > > > > > > To learn more, please visit us at http://www.oversee.net > > > > > > Josh Stomel | Business Development > > Jstomel at oversee.net > > Tel: 213.408.0072 > > Fax: 213.892.1214 > > YIM: TechRecruiter00 > > AIM: WcidUsa > > Skype: JoshStomel > > Professional Profile > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Properties > > www.revenue.net > > www.domainsponsor.com > > www.blogsource.com > > www.low.com > > www.information.com > > www.degrees.com > > www.newsalerts.com > > www.livedigital.com > > > > > > > > > > > >----- End forwarded message ----- > >-- >David Fetter http://fetter.org/ >phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 > Skype: davidfetter > >Remember to vote! >_______________________________________________ >Losangeles-pm mailing list >Losangeles-pm at pm.org >http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm From pablo at paeli.com Fri Aug 11 18:38:33 2006 From: pablo at paeli.com (Pablo Velasquez) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:38:33 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] =?iso-8859-1?q?As_if_you_didn=27t_know=2E=2E=2E_Ticketmas?= =?iso-8859-1?q?ter_is_looking_for_solid_perl_p=09eople_=3B_=29?= In-Reply-To: <4CC93424-9AAA-4858-A391-FD7D23F13E16@develooper.com> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D40357E@pasmail3.office.tmcs> <20060811003045.GC21037@mitch.veggiechinese.net> <4CC93424-9AAA-4858-A391-FD7D23F13E16@develooper.com> Message-ID: <200608111838.33354.pablo@paeli.com> but never from the spam, no exceptions to that one! :-) On Thursday 10 August 2006 7:54 pm, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote: > On Aug 10, 2006, at 5:30 PM, William Yardley wrote: > > > If you take up Todd's offer and get a job there I'm pretty sure > you'll be able to get tickets without the ticketing fees. :-) > > > - ask > > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm From nick at ccl4.org Sat Aug 12 07:24:12 2006 From: nick at ccl4.org (Nicholas Clark) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 15:24:12 +0100 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA Message-ID: <20060812142412.GC5342@plum.flirble.org> There's some irony here, I feel. In LA we have (at least) 3 big money- making mod_perl using companies trying to recruit solid Perl people to write in depth Perl code, and finding that they're in short supply locally. (Shopzilla, Ticketmaster, Oversee.net. Not sure if Citysearch are currently recruiting, not aware if I've missed any other firms. If so, sorry) Yet in London it seems that there are more good people than good jobs to stretch them: http://london.pm.org/pipermail/london.pm/Week-of-Mon-20060731/003436.html thread spills into the next week http://london.pm.org/pipermail/london.pm/Week-of-Mon-20060807/thread.html (and I've had feedback that Paris and Amsterdam are roughly similar) What's wrong with the world? Nicholas Clark From dpisoni at shopzilla.com Sat Aug 12 10:15:06 2006 From: dpisoni at shopzilla.com (David Pisoni) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:15:06 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060812142412.GC5342@plum.flirble.org> References: <20060812142412.GC5342@plum.flirble.org> Message-ID: <6035E2A8-E9D8-4999-AD28-E7D16AB96123@shopzilla.com> Well, Citysearch == Ticketmaster (and many other brands.) Valueclick seems to be as aggressive as the aforementioned companies as well, though they're a bit further afield. What's wrong with the world? Lots of things, though I'm not sure this issue qualifies as something "wrong with the world." Chock it up to the peculiarity of market forces? That's all I got. David On Aug 12, 2006, at 07.24 , Nicholas Clark wrote: > There's some irony here, I feel. In LA we have (at least) 3 big money- > making mod_perl using companies trying to recruit solid Perl people to > write in depth Perl code, and finding that they're in short supply > locally. > > (Shopzilla, Ticketmaster, Oversee.net. Not sure if Citysearch are > currently > recruiting, not aware if I've missed any other firms. If so, sorry) > > Yet in London it seems that there are more good people than good > jobs to > stretch them: > > http://london.pm.org/pipermail/london.pm/Week-of- > Mon-20060731/003436.html > thread spills into the next week > http://london.pm.org/pipermail/london.pm/Week-of-Mon-20060807/ > thread.html > > (and I've had feedback that Paris and Amsterdam are roughly similar) > > What's wrong with the world? > > Nicholas Clark > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm From rspier at pobox.com Sat Aug 12 10:27:36 2006 From: rspier at pobox.com (Robert Spier) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:27:36 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <6035E2A8-E9D8-4999-AD28-E7D16AB96123@shopzilla.com> References: <20060812142412.GC5342@plum.flirble.org> <6035E2A8-E9D8-4999-AD28-E7D16AB96123@shopzilla.com> Message-ID: > Well, Citysearch == Ticketmaster (and many other brands.) This is not true, and has not been true for many years. When I left, the companies shared a parent company and some corporate IT infrastructure (i.e. Exchange Servers and a few other things). That's pretty much it. -R From nick at ccl4.org Sat Aug 12 10:40:03 2006 From: nick at ccl4.org (Nicholas Clark) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:40:03 +0100 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: References: <20060812142412.GC5342@plum.flirble.org> <6035E2A8-E9D8-4999-AD28-E7D16AB96123@shopzilla.com> Message-ID: <20060812174002.GF5342@plum.flirble.org> On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 10:27:36AM -0700, Robert Spier wrote: > > Well, Citysearch == Ticketmaster (and many other brands.) > > This is not true, and has not been true for many years. > > When I left, the companies shared a parent company and some corporate > IT infrastructure (i.e. Exchange Servers and a few other things). > That's pretty much it. I wasn't sure, but I found that the street addresses on whois and the nameservers were totally different, so I assumed that they were not. whois is a great source of information, some of which people are careful not to put on the web. Nicholas Clark From ask at develooper.com Sat Aug 12 11:30:18 2006 From: ask at develooper.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?=) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 11:30:18 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: References: <20060812142412.GC5342@plum.flirble.org> <6035E2A8-E9D8-4999-AD28-E7D16AB96123@shopzilla.com> Message-ID: On Aug 12, 2006, at 10:27, Robert Spier wrote: >> Well, Citysearch == Ticketmaster (and many other brands.) > > This is not true, and has not been true for many years. > > When I left, the companies shared a parent company and some corporate > IT infrastructure (i.e. Exchange Servers and a few other things). > That's pretty much it. They share the Peets Coffee under the Citysearch office as well. :-) Despite what whois says they are neighbors across the street on Sunset Blvd. On the original subject: Overture Yahoo Search Marketing is in Burbank and of course Google in Santa Monica have suckered a few people to come work there (even if they aren't much of a Perl shop). My impression is that it's much more common to use LAMP-stuff for building web things here than than in Europe (and the rest of the world, maybe with the exception of Japan). Maybe the bigger "local" market makes it easier to get forced away from Windows systems? - ask -- http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/ From kevin+lapm at scaldeferri.com Sat Aug 12 11:42:33 2006 From: kevin+lapm at scaldeferri.com (Kevin Scaldeferri) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 11:42:33 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060812142412.GC5342@plum.flirble.org> References: <20060812142412.GC5342@plum.flirble.org> Message-ID: <57dcc083f3539b096f7f5566f96cf257@scaldeferri.com> On Aug 12, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Nicholas Clark wrote: > There's some irony here, I feel. In LA we have (at least) 3 big money- > making mod_perl using companies trying to recruit solid Perl people to > write in depth Perl code, and finding that they're in short supply > locally. > > (Shopzilla, Ticketmaster, Oversee.net. Not sure if Citysearch are > currently > recruiting, not aware if I've missed any other firms. If so, sorry) > > Yet in London it seems that there are more good people than good jobs > to > stretch them: > > http://london.pm.org/pipermail/london.pm/Week-of-Mon-20060731/ > 003436.html > thread spills into the next week > http://london.pm.org/pipermail/london.pm/Week-of-Mon-20060807/ > thread.html > > (and I've had feedback that Paris and Amsterdam are roughly similar) > > What's wrong with the world? > Well, I don't know about the world, but in the US many people don't want to live in LA (perhaps even for valid reasons), and it is nearly impossible to get people to move from the Bay Area / Silicon Valley in particular, even when the job situation there was truly dire but LA was hiring like crazy. Of course, there's also the fact that we (Overture) never lacked for applicants. What was hard to find was people we were willing to hire (and who didn't also have other offers in Silicon Valley, which they inevitably took even when we were offering more money in a less expensive area). -kevin From Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com Mon Aug 14 08:41:56 2006 From: Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com (Todd Cranston-Cuebas) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:41:56 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA Message-ID: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> David, Wanted to point out that while Ticketmaster and Citysearch are both IAC companies (owned by InterActiveCorp), the relationship really isn't Citysearch == Ticketmaster. At one point, that was much closer to being true, but for many years now, the two companies act independently in just about every way short of certain cross-promotion agreements. In fact, it is my understanding that Citysearch is now doing more Java development, but honestly, I'd need someone from that team to clarify the situation. In terms of market forces, I think that there are a number of issues worth discussing. I hope that the local demand for perl engineers is enough to cause the much needed market shift (i.e., more people in the States learning perl on a very deep level). I'm concerned that other forces may counteract this adjustment including the fact that schools in the States push Java, python is becoming more popular as a general purpose scripting language, and other languages and frameworks (e.g., Ruby on Rails) are taking up the "I want to build a simple web site" position. As far as engineers in the UK go, the visa issues making things tough, but when the next allotment of visas are available next year (We can apply in April, 07), I'd love to talk to UK engineers! Todd tcc at ticketmaster.com > -----Original Message----- > From: losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org > [mailto:losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org] On > Behalf Of David Pisoni > Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 10:15 AM > To: Nicholas Clark > Cc: losangeles-pm at pm.org > Subject: Re: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA > > Well, Citysearch == Ticketmaster (and many other brands.) > Valueclick seems to be as aggressive as the aforementioned > companies as well, though they're a bit further afield. > > What's wrong with the world? Lots of things, though I'm not > sure this issue qualifies as something "wrong with the > world." Chock it up to the peculiarity of market forces? > That's all I got. > > David > > On Aug 12, 2006, at 07.24 , Nicholas Clark wrote: > > > There's some irony here, I feel. In LA we have (at least) 3 > big money- > > making mod_perl using companies trying to recruit solid > Perl people to > > write in depth Perl code, and finding that they're in short supply > > locally. > > > > (Shopzilla, Ticketmaster, Oversee.net. Not sure if Citysearch are > > currently recruiting, not aware if I've missed any other > firms. If so, > > sorry) > > > > Yet in London it seems that there are more good people than > good jobs > > to stretch them: > > > > http://london.pm.org/pipermail/london.pm/Week-of- > > Mon-20060731/003436.html > > thread spills into the next week > > http://london.pm.org/pipermail/london.pm/Week-of-Mon-20060807/ > > thread.html > > > > (and I've had feedback that Paris and Amsterdam are roughly similar) > > > > What's wrong with the world? > > > > Nicholas Clark > > _______________________________________________ > > Losangeles-pm mailing list > > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > From nick at ccl4.org Mon Aug 14 09:02:01 2006 From: nick at ccl4.org (Nicholas Clark) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:02:01 +0100 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Message-ID: <20060814160200.GQ5342@plum.flirble.org> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:41:56AM -0700, Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote: > As far as engineers in the UK go, the visa issues making things tough, but > when the next allotment of visas are available next year (We can apply in > April, 07), I'd love to talk to UK engineers! The US Technology industry thinks that it's unlikely to be able to successfully lobby the government to change this? Nicholas Clark From dpisoni at shopzilla.com Mon Aug 14 09:27:48 2006 From: dpisoni at shopzilla.com (David Pisoni) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:27:48 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Message-ID: On Aug 12, 2006, at 10.27 , Robert Spier wrote: >> Well, Citysearch == Ticketmaster (and many other brands.) > > This is not true, and has not been true for many years. > > When I left, the companies shared a parent company and some corporate > IT infrastructure (i.e. Exchange Servers and a few other things). > That's pretty much it. On Aug 14, 2006, at 08.41 , Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote: > David, > > Wanted to point out that while Ticketmaster and Citysearch are both > IAC > companies (owned by InterActiveCorp), the relationship really isn't > Citysearch == Ticketmaster. At one point, that was much closer to > being > true, but for many years now, the two companies act independently > in just > about every way short of certain cross-promotion agreements. In > fact, it is > my understanding that Citysearch is now doing more Java > development, but > honestly, I'd need someone from that team to clarify the situation. I got it guys, thanks. :) Per Ask's point, you can't blame me too much for drawing the inference, erroneous as it may have been. David From dpisoni at shopzilla.com Mon Aug 14 09:31:51 2006 From: dpisoni at shopzilla.com (David Pisoni) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:31:51 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060814160200.GQ5342@plum.flirble.org> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> <20060814160200.GQ5342@plum.flirble.org> Message-ID: <7889F878-77D8-4E57-84C7-680E6CB94B0B@shopzilla.com> On Aug 14, 2006, at 09.02 , Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:41:56AM -0700, Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote: > >> As far as engineers in the UK go, the visa issues making things >> tough, but >> when the next allotment of visas are available next year (We can >> apply in >> April, 07), I'd love to talk to UK engineers! > > The US Technology industry thinks that it's unlikely to be able to > successfully lobby the government to change this? > > Nicholas Clark The need for foreign, technical workers and the paranoia of "Homeland Security" are often at odds. It muddies the water a bit in Congress. David From apisoni at shopzilla.com Mon Aug 14 10:10:22 2006 From: apisoni at shopzilla.com (Adam Pisoni) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:10:22 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Message-ID: On Aug 14, 2006, at 8:41 AM, Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote: > I'm concerned that other forces may counteract > this adjustment including the fact that schools in the States push > Java, > python is becoming more popular as a general purpose scripting > language, and > other languages and frameworks (e.g., Ruby on Rails) are taking up > the "I > want to build a simple web site" position. > Ruby is a great language, but it is also just the flavor of the month. I don't think Perl is going anywhere anytime soon. Since Rails is basically the de-facto web app framework for Ruby, it gets a lot of press. Perl has any number of similar and perhaps better frameworks, but they are not as well known. Most people writing perl web apps still think in terms of scripts. If anything, we just need more publicity of the ease of creating Perl web apps. Thanks, adam From Peter at PSDT.com Mon Aug 14 10:22:58 2006 From: Peter at PSDT.com (Peter Scott) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:22:58 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060814160200.GQ5342@plum.flirble.org> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> <20060814160200.GQ5342@plum.flirble.org> Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.2.20060814101456.025ca710@mail.webquarry.com> At 09:02 AM 8/14/2006, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > As far as engineers in the UK go, the visa issues making things tough, but > > when the next allotment of visas are available next year (We can apply in > > April, 07), I'd love to talk to UK engineers! > >The US Technology industry thinks that it's unlikely to be able to >successfully lobby the government to change this? The ITAA has some powerful opponents. The AFL-CIO (eq TUC) for one, I assume, but there is also opposition in the senate from, e.g., Chris Dodd. Numerous federal bills have been proposed limiting offshoring, all of them shot down or watered down in some way, but H1-Bs have been caught in the crossfire and several similar statewide bills have passed. Public sentiment in the US is somewhat, um, xenophobic at the moment, and the politicos are pandering to the popular vote. Plus, the immigration department is in disarray due to reorganization and backlogs caused by far stricter applicant checking requirements. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies http://www.perldebugged.com/ http://www.perlmedic.com/ From jamespitts at yahoo.com Mon Aug 14 10:28:16 2006 From: jamespitts at yahoo.com (James Pitts) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060814172816.2754.qmail@web55206.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Perl seems to be a strong thread throughout the Idealabs companies. For those of you who worked at Shopzilla, eToys, and Citysearch, do you know any of the history about how Bill Gross' companies became perl shops? Was there a perl advocate from Caltech or JPL on the Idealabs staff? Or has LA been a good place for perl merely because it became ubiq in the online porn industry :) - James --- Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote: > > On the original subject: Overture Yahoo Search > Marketing is in Burbank and of course Google in Santa Monica have > suckered a few people to come work there (even if they aren't much of > > a Perl shop). > > My impression is that it's much more common to use LAMP-stuff for > building web things here than than in Europe (and the rest of the > world, maybe with the exception of Japan). > > Maybe the bigger "local" market makes it easier to get forced away > from Windows systems? > > > - ask > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From ehammond at thinksome.com Mon Aug 14 12:26:07 2006 From: ehammond at thinksome.com (Eric Hammond) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:26:07 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060814172816.2754.qmail@web55206.mail.re4.yahoo.com> References: <20060814172816.2754.qmail@web55206.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20060814192607.GC6037@level22.com> James Pitts wrote: > Perl seems to be a strong thread throughout the Idealabs companies. For > those of you who worked at Shopzilla, eToys, and Citysearch, do you > know any of the history about how Bill Gross' companies became perl > shops? Was there a perl advocate from Caltech or JPL on the Idealabs > staff? I am pretty sure I can take credit for being the first Perl advocate at the first Idealab company. I was one of the first technology folks hired at Citysearch and was writing and pushing Perl there in July 1996. I was previously coding Perl (and C, C++, etc) in Cincinnati before Caskey (18 at the time) asked me to move to LA for Citysearch. Though the Citysearch development team was not able to switch the front end to Perl until after I left, we did code large chunks of the back end in Perl and ended up with quite a few Perl lovers who spread out to other companies in the area. In particular two groups of developers left Citysearch and went to eToys (an Idealab company) and Rent.com (not an Idealab company). I don't know how Perl became popular at other Idealab companies and the rest of LA. I'm sure it wasn't any one person's influence unless you count Larry. -- Eric Hammond ehammond at thinksome.com From Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com Mon Aug 14 12:59:55 2006 From: Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com (Todd Cranston-Cuebas) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:59:55 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA Message-ID: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035D0@pasmail3.office.tmcs> While perl is very popular in LA, we should note that I'm hearing that perl is being supplanted in a number of industries by languages like Python. For example, python used more and more for movie industry "pipelining" applications where images are pipelined through image processors until they are then consolidated again for the final production. I've heard that this industry was mostly perl and now may be as much 50/50 perl/python. The perl foundation has to take this type of a shift seriously. I think each engineer thinks in terms of their own, individual needs (which is understandable), but the perl foundation needs to see perl in the context of a changing industry. I know that they are and do take these points seriously. I recently met with two perl foundation members to discuss this very point. I only mentioned ruby on rails in an earlier post since many people "stick" with the language that scratched their earliest itches. This was clearly the case for many PHP people. If perl is the language of choice only for ad-hoc automation scripts or large-scale, complex solutions on the other extreme, then you run the risk of having your potential "new blood" siphoned off by other technologies that allow for the building of modest, but complete solutions with lower learning curves. All groups/organizations/entities need to think in terms of the overall "health" of the community (e.g., maintaining a flow of new members, satisfying the needs of existing members, etc.). Todd > -----Original Message----- > From: losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org > [mailto:losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org] On > Behalf Of Eric Hammond > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 12:26 PM > To: James Pitts > Cc: losangeles-pm at pm.org > Subject: Re: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA > > James Pitts wrote: > > Perl seems to be a strong thread throughout the Idealabs companies. > > For those of you who worked at Shopzilla, eToys, and Citysearch, do > > you know any of the history about how Bill Gross' companies became > > perl shops? Was there a perl advocate from Caltech or JPL on the > > Idealabs staff? > > I am pretty sure I can take credit for being the first Perl > advocate at the first Idealab company. I was one of the > first technology folks hired at Citysearch and was writing > and pushing Perl there in July 1996. > I was previously coding Perl (and C, C++, etc) in Cincinnati > before Caskey (18 at the time) asked me to move to LA for Citysearch. > > Though the Citysearch development team was not able to switch > the front end to Perl until after I left, we did code large > chunks of the back end in Perl and ended up with quite a few > Perl lovers who spread out to other companies in the area. > In particular two groups of developers left Citysearch and > went to eToys (an Idealab company) and Rent.com (not an > Idealab company). > > I don't know how Perl became popular at other Idealab > companies and the rest of LA. I'm sure it wasn't any one > person's influence unless you count Larry. > > -- > Eric Hammond > ehammond at thinksome.com > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > From nick at ccl4.org Mon Aug 14 13:17:33 2006 From: nick at ccl4.org (Nicholas Clark) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:17:33 +0100 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Message-ID: <20060814201732.GS5342@plum.flirble.org> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:41:56AM -0700, Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote: > In terms of market forces, I think that there are a number of issues worth > discussing. I hope that the local demand for perl engineers is enough to > cause the much needed market shift (i.e., more people in the States learning > perl on a very deep level). I'm concerned that other forces may counteract > this adjustment including the fact that schools in the States push Java, > python is becoming more popular as a general purpose scripting language, and > other languages and frameworks (e.g., Ruby on Rails) are taking up the "I > want to build a simple web site" position. Surely the adjustment will only happen if forces in favour of Perl increase relative to other languages? Basically Perl has to be perceived as some combination of "more fun" and "more lucrative" than the average of the competition. And right now there's a general recruiting suck across the field, isn't there, rather than a particularly hard vacuum in the area of Perl? Nicholas Clark From jleader at alumni.caltech.edu Mon Aug 14 13:22:59 2006 From: jleader at alumni.caltech.edu (Jeremy Leader) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:22:59 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060814172816.2754.qmail@web55206.mail.re4.yahoo.com> References: <20060814172816.2754.qmail@web55206.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <44E0DBA3.40308@alumni.caltech.edu> on 08/14/2006 10:28 AM James Pitts wrote: > Perl seems to be a strong thread throughout the Idealabs companies. For > those of you who worked at Shopzilla, eToys, and Citysearch, do you > know any of the history about how Bill Gross' companies became perl > shops? Was there a perl advocate from Caltech or JPL on the Idealabs > staff? > > Or has LA been a good place for perl merely because it became ubiq in > the online porn industry :) > > - James I worked with Dan Kegel at Knowledge Adventure, Bill Gross's edutainment CDROM (and floppy!) company before the start of Idealabs. This was around '93 to '95. Dan was a big Perl and open source advocate; as a result, we had a fair number of internal tools and scripts, originally written in Perl 4. Dan also set up KA's first web site, and mentored quite a few interns, some of whom went on to other Idealabs companies, including CitySearch, New.net, and Evolution Robotics. I believe Dan was probably the first person to expose Bill Gross to Perl. -- Jeremy Leader jleader at alumni.caltech.edu leaderj at yahoo-inc.com (work) From Peter at PSDT.com Mon Aug 14 13:24:04 2006 From: Peter at PSDT.com (Peter Scott) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:24:04 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060814201732.GS5342@plum.flirble.org> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> <20060814201732.GS5342@plum.flirble.org> Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.2.20060814132107.024c1b70@mail.webquarry.com> At 01:17 PM 8/14/2006, Nicholas Clark wrote: >Surely the adjustment will only happen if forces in favour of Perl increase >relative to other languages? Two words: Perl 6. >Basically Perl has to be perceived as some >combination of "more fun" and "more lucrative" than the average of the >competition. And right now there's a general recruiting suck across the >field, isn't there, rather than a particularly hard vacuum in the area of >Perl? Regardless of the general trend, there's a more pronounced, er, suckiness, in the Perl arena. Take a look at http://www.google.com/trends?q=perl+programming%2Cpython+programming%2Cruby+programming&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all . The Perl line is going down while the Python line is level and the Ruby line is coming up. I think this is as close to unbiased empirical industrywide data as we're going to get. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies http://www.perldebugged.com/ http://www.perlmedic.com/ From nick at ccl4.org Mon Aug 14 13:49:36 2006 From: nick at ccl4.org (Nicholas Clark) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:49:36 +0100 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20060814132107.024c1b70@mail.webquarry.com> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> <20060814201732.GS5342@plum.flirble.org> <6.2.3.4.2.20060814132107.024c1b70@mail.webquarry.com> Message-ID: <20060814204934.GU5342@plum.flirble.org> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 01:24:04PM -0700, Peter Scott wrote: > At 01:17 PM 8/14/2006, Nicholas Clark wrote: > >Surely the adjustment will only happen if forces in favour of Perl increase > >relative to other languages? > > Two words: Perl 6. I can't see that really kicking in until an implementation is sufficiently production ready that it's a viable choice for quick scripts and true prototypes. There's a lot of activity both in the language spec and the various implementations, but it's not easy to gauge how near anything is to readiness. Nicholas Clark From merlyn at stonehenge.com Mon Aug 14 14:16:04 2006 From: merlyn at stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Date: 14 Aug 2006 14:16:04 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060814192607.GC6037@level22.com> References: <20060814172816.2754.qmail@web55206.mail.re4.yahoo.com> <20060814192607.GC6037@level22.com> Message-ID: <8664gvxbl7.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> >>>>> "Eric" == Eric Hammond writes: Eric> I am pretty sure I can take credit for being the first Perl advocate at Eric> the first Idealab company. I was one of the first technology folks Eric> hired at Citysearch and was writing and pushing Perl there in July 1996. I'm not entirely sure of the history, but I think Idealabs was also the breeding grounds of goto.com, which became Overture and eventually Yahoo Search Marketing. And there's still quite a bit of Perl in those parts. I can't exactly say how I know. :) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! From apisoni at shopzilla.com Mon Aug 14 14:10:46 2006 From: apisoni at shopzilla.com (Adam Pisoni) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:10:46 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060814201732.GS5342@plum.flirble.org> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> <20060814201732.GS5342@plum.flirble.org> Message-ID: <92386C7D-D1E6-48EF-A85C-4AE1E95E35D8@shopzilla.com> I don't know. Its pretty easy to find Java guys right now. Good ones too. At least in LA, there is definitely a difference in the availability of qualified Perl engineers as opposed to C, Java, PHP.. Not sure about Python or Ruby. Thanks, Adam On Aug 14, 2006, at 1:17 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:41:56AM -0700, Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote: > >> In terms of market forces, I think that there are a number of >> issues worth >> discussing. I hope that the local demand for perl engineers is >> enough to >> cause the much needed market shift (i.e., more people in the >> States learning >> perl on a very deep level). I'm concerned that other forces may >> counteract >> this adjustment including the fact that schools in the States push >> Java, >> python is becoming more popular as a general purpose scripting >> language, and >> other languages and frameworks (e.g., Ruby on Rails) are taking up >> the "I >> want to build a simple web site" position. > > Surely the adjustment will only happen if forces in favour of Perl > increase > relative to other languages? Basically Perl has to be perceived as > some > combination of "more fun" and "more lucrative" than the average of the > competition. And right now there's a general recruiting suck across > the > field, isn't there, rather than a particularly hard vacuum in the > area of > Perl? > > Nicholas Clark > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm From Peter at PSDT.com Mon Aug 14 14:34:16 2006 From: Peter at PSDT.com (Peter Scott) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:34:16 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060814204934.GU5342@plum.flirble.org> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> <20060814201732.GS5342@plum.flirble.org> <6.2.3.4.2.20060814132107.024c1b70@mail.webquarry.com> <20060814204934.GU5342@plum.flirble.org> Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.2.20060814143326.024bf8a0@mail.webquarry.com> At 01:49 PM 8/14/2006, Nicholas Clark wrote: >On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 01:24:04PM -0700, Peter Scott wrote: > > At 01:17 PM 8/14/2006, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > >Surely the adjustment will only happen if forces in favour of Perl > increase > > >relative to other languages? > > > > Two words: Perl 6. > >I can't see that really kicking in until an implementation is sufficiently >production ready that it's a viable choice for quick scripts and true >prototypes. There's a lot of activity both in the language spec and the >various implementations, but it's not easy to gauge how near anything is >to readiness. Right, but I was responding to the future hypothetical tense in your statement :-) -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies http://www.perldebugged.com/ http://www.perlmedic.com/ From ehammond at thinksome.com Mon Aug 14 14:41:01 2006 From: ehammond at thinksome.com (Eric Hammond) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:41:01 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <8664gvxbl7.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <20060814172816.2754.qmail@web55206.mail.re4.yahoo.com> <20060814192607.GC6037@level22.com> <8664gvxbl7.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Message-ID: <20060814214101.GB6403@level22.com> Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > I'm not entirely sure of the history, but I think Idealabs was also the > breeding grounds of goto.com, which became Overture and eventually Yahoo > Search Marketing. For those not familiar with the history, Citysearch was marketed as "an Idealab company" but had very little to do with the Idealabs incubation factory. We were not located near any other Idealabs companies and had zero interaction with their developers. I only remember seeing Bill Gross once in my years at Citysearch. The Perl growth in Idealabs and other LA companies has come from many corners with each developer using it adding his or her own contribution to the expansion. I have programmed almost exclusively in Perl since 1993 and am quick to explain to others how useful I find it, but I don't think the whole world should use Perl, nor do I object to the rise of Ruby or Python. Coming from an evangelical Christian background I understand how strong the human desire is to belong to a group and to want to convince everybody to do things the way "we" do. I see some of the same traits in users of programming language and operating systems. -- Eric Hammond ehammond at thinksome.com From apisoni at shopzilla.com Mon Aug 14 17:29:54 2006 From: apisoni at shopzilla.com (Adam Pisoni) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:29:54 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060814204934.GU5342@plum.flirble.org> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> <20060814201732.GS5342@plum.flirble.org> <6.2.3.4.2.20060814132107.024c1b70@mail.webquarry.com> <20060814204934.GU5342@plum.flirble.org> Message-ID: <21D16D3E-87EE-4BA9-B338-2DED7018EA80@shopzilla.com> On Aug 14, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 01:24:04PM -0700, Peter Scott wrote: >> At 01:17 PM 8/14/2006, Nicholas Clark wrote: >>> Surely the adjustment will only happen if forces in favour of >>> Perl increase >>> relative to other languages? >> >> Two words: Perl 6. > > I can't see that really kicking in until an implementation is > sufficiently > production ready that it's a viable choice for quick scripts and true > prototypes. There's a lot of activity both in the language spec and > the > various implementations, but it's not easy to gauge how near > anything is > to readiness. > > Nicholas Clark I think there's a conflict of interest having the Perl 5 maintainer say we shouldn't use Perl 6 now. You're just trying to keep your job, admit it! Thanks, adam From perl.monger at yahoo.com Mon Aug 14 20:14:57 2006 From: perl.monger at yahoo.com (Christian Bryant) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035BD@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Message-ID: <20060815031457.54430.qmail@web39808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> On a completely side note, did Randal ever appear at Ticketmaster? We had just wrapped up our Perl training with Mr. Sherer of the TO PM, when we learned Schwartz was, then wasn't showing up at Value Click. Personally, I'd prefer Ticketmaster where all the real Perl elite work... Regards, Christian Bryant A Los Angeles Perl Monger http://la.pm.org/ Phone: 818-519-1880 E-mail: perl.monger at yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From merlyn at stonehenge.com Mon Aug 14 20:53:00 2006 From: merlyn at stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Date: 14 Aug 2006 20:53:00 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060815031457.54430.qmail@web39808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060815031457.54430.qmail@web39808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <861wriwt7n.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> >>>>> "Christian" == Christian Bryant writes: Christian> On a completely side note, did Randal ever appear at Christian> Ticketmaster? We had just wrapped up our Perl Christian> training with Mr. Sherer of the TO PM, when we learned Christian> Schwartz was, then wasn't showing up at Value Click. Christian> Personally, I'd prefer Ticketmaster where all the real Christian> Perl elite work... That's tomorrow night. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! From perl.monger at yahoo.com Mon Aug 14 20:54:20 2006 From: perl.monger at yahoo.com (Christian Bryant) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:54:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <861wriwt7n.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Message-ID: <20060815035420.94793.qmail@web39808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Most excellent. I shall be there, Mr. Schwartz. --- "Randal L. Schwartz" wrote: > >>>>> "Christian" == Christian Bryant > writes: > > Christian> On a completely side note, did Randal > ever appear at > Christian> Ticketmaster? We had just wrapped up our > Perl > Christian> training with Mr. Sherer of the TO PM, > when we learned > Christian> Schwartz was, then wasn't showing up at > Value Click. > Christian> Personally, I'd prefer Ticketmaster where > all the real > Christian> Perl elite work... > > That's tomorrow night. > > -- > Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, > Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 > > > Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, > Comedy, etc. etc. > See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and > open-enrollment Perl training! > Regards, Christian Bryant A Los Angeles Perl Monger http://la.pm.org/ Phone: 818-519-1880 E-mail: perl.monger at yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From ehgrad at yahoo-inc.com Tue Aug 15 09:54:23 2006 From: ehgrad at yahoo-inc.com (Eric Gradman) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:54:23 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035D0@pasmail3.office.tmcs> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035D0@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Message-ID: When I was a Perl Monger at Oversee.net, I conducted a sobering interview. We had a candidate come in the door with a strong command of Perl (a rare event to be sure). During the interview it came out that he was learning Java. I asked him why, and he explained that former colleagues at Idealab had complained that due to the extreme difficulty of finding competent Perl programmers, they were increasingly starting new development projects in Java. My jaw dropped, and I spent the rest of the interview in shock. Personally, I'm avoiding learning anything at all about Perl 6... I worry that if I fall in love with new language features that I can't use in a production environment for a decade, I'll have switch to a different language that scratches that itch. And despite their faults, Python and Ruby have a lot of compelling features. On Aug 14, 2006, at 12:59 PM, Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote: > While perl is very popular in LA, we should note that I'm hearing > that perl > is being supplanted in a number of industries by languages like > Python. For > example, python used more and more for movie industry "pipelining" > applications where images are pipelined through image processors > until they > are then consolidated again for the final production. I've heard > that this > industry was mostly perl and now may be as much 50/50 perl/python. > The perl > foundation has to take this type of a shift seriously. I think each > engineer > thinks in terms of their own, individual needs (which is > understandable), > but the perl foundation needs to see perl in the context of a changing > industry. I know that they are and do take these points seriously. I > recently met with two perl foundation members to discuss this very > point. > > I only mentioned ruby on rails in an earlier post since many people > "stick" > with the language that scratched their earliest itches. This was > clearly the > case for many PHP people. If perl is the language of choice only > for ad-hoc > automation scripts or large-scale, complex solutions on the other > extreme, > then you run the risk of having your potential "new blood" siphoned > off by > other technologies that allow for the building of modest, but complete > solutions with lower learning curves. All groups/organizations/ > entities need > to think in terms of the overall "health" of the community (e.g., > maintaining a flow of new members, satisfying the needs of existing > members, > etc.). > > Todd > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org >> [mailto:losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org] On >> Behalf Of Eric Hammond >> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 12:26 PM >> To: James Pitts >> Cc: losangeles-pm at pm.org >> Subject: Re: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA >> >> James Pitts wrote: >>> Perl seems to be a strong thread throughout the Idealabs companies. >>> For those of you who worked at Shopzilla, eToys, and Citysearch, do >>> you know any of the history about how Bill Gross' companies became >>> perl shops? Was there a perl advocate from Caltech or JPL on the >>> Idealabs staff? >> >> I am pretty sure I can take credit for being the first Perl >> advocate at the first Idealab company. I was one of the >> first technology folks hired at Citysearch and was writing >> and pushing Perl there in July 1996. >> I was previously coding Perl (and C, C++, etc) in Cincinnati >> before Caskey (18 at the time) asked me to move to LA for Citysearch. >> >> Though the Citysearch development team was not able to switch >> the front end to Perl until after I left, we did code large >> chunks of the back end in Perl and ended up with quite a few >> Perl lovers who spread out to other companies in the area. >> In particular two groups of developers left Citysearch and >> went to eToys (an Idealab company) and Rent.com (not an >> Idealab company). >> >> I don't know how Perl became popular at other Idealab >> companies and the rest of LA. I'm sure it wasn't any one >> person's influence unless you count Larry. >> >> -- >> Eric Hammond >> ehammond at thinksome.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Losangeles-pm mailing list >> Losangeles-pm at pm.org >> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm >> > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > > From perl.monger at yahoo.com Tue Aug 15 10:29:14 2006 From: perl.monger at yahoo.com (Christian Bryant) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060815172914.98499.qmail@web39801.mail.mud.yahoo.com> As a _user_ more than a programmer, I have to say that over the last 15 years I've seen many usage arguments for various languages. I consider myself a Perl monger as a user and integrator, certainly not a programmer, and I'm personally excited to see Perl 6 (which, by the way, I believe is a mostly transparent change when it comes to language features) start reaching the production environment in major companies. I've worked with Java this last year on a level I'd never had before in an online banking environment. All our Configuration Management tasks are automated and controlled by Perl. All our applications are J2EE. I see that as perfect symbiosis. Nobody ever suggested we use Java for the CM tasks - well, I explored the notion then discounted it due to detailed requirements analysis. What I would say in response to this anecdote is, if detailed requirements were written and it was determined that in fact Java was the most useful language for their task, then great! I don't believe the availability of coders in a language has any part in such a decision, though. Never discount a language as useful, either. As a systems integrator, I see the value of multiple languages at work every day. - CB --- Eric Gradman wrote: > When I was a Perl Monger at Oversee.net, I conducted > a sobering > interview. We had a candidate come in the door with > a strong command > of Perl (a rare event to be sure). During the > interview it came out > that he was learning Java. I asked him why, and he > explained that > former colleagues at Idealab had complained that due > to the extreme > difficulty of finding competent Perl programmers, > they were > increasingly starting new development projects in > Java. My jaw > dropped, and I spent the rest of the interview in > shock. > > Personally, I'm avoiding learning anything at all > about Perl 6... I > worry that if I fall in love with new language > features that I can't > use in a production environment for a decade, I'll > have switch to a > different language that scratches that itch. And > despite their > faults, Python and Ruby have a lot of compelling > features. > > On Aug 14, 2006, at 12:59 PM, Todd Cranston-Cuebas > wrote: > > > While perl is very popular in LA, we should note > that I'm hearing > > that perl > > is being supplanted in a number of industries by > languages like > > Python. For > > example, python used more and more for movie > industry "pipelining" > > applications where images are pipelined through > image processors > > until they > > are then consolidated again for the final > production. I've heard > > that this > > industry was mostly perl and now may be as much > 50/50 perl/python. > > The perl > > foundation has to take this type of a shift > seriously. I think each > > engineer > > thinks in terms of their own, individual needs > (which is > > understandable), > > but the perl foundation needs to see perl in the > context of a changing > > industry. I know that they are and do take these > points seriously. I > > recently met with two perl foundation members to > discuss this very > > point. > > > > I only mentioned ruby on rails in an earlier post > since many people > > "stick" > > with the language that scratched their earliest > itches. This was > > clearly the > > case for many PHP people. If perl is the language > of choice only > > for ad-hoc > > automation scripts or large-scale, complex > solutions on the other > > extreme, > > then you run the risk of having your potential > "new blood" siphoned > > off by > > other technologies that allow for the building of > modest, but complete > > solutions with lower learning curves. All > groups/organizations/ > > entities need > > to think in terms of the overall "health" of the > community (e.g., > > maintaining a flow of new members, satisfying the > needs of existing > > members, > > etc.). > > > > Todd > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: > losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org > >> > [mailto:losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org] > On > >> Behalf Of Eric Hammond > >> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 12:26 PM > >> To: James Pitts > >> Cc: losangeles-pm at pm.org > >> Subject: Re: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA > >> > >> James Pitts wrote: > >>> Perl seems to be a strong thread throughout the > Idealabs companies. > >>> For those of you who worked at Shopzilla, eToys, > and Citysearch, do > >>> you know any of the history about how Bill > Gross' companies became > >>> perl shops? Was there a perl advocate from > Caltech or JPL on the > >>> Idealabs staff? > >> > >> I am pretty sure I can take credit for being the > first Perl > >> advocate at the first Idealab company. I was one > of the > >> first technology folks hired at Citysearch and > was writing > >> and pushing Perl there in July 1996. > >> I was previously coding Perl (and C, C++, etc) in > Cincinnati > >> before Caskey (18 at the time) asked me to move > to LA for Citysearch. > >> > >> Though the Citysearch development team was not > able to switch > >> the front end to Perl until after I left, we did > code large > >> chunks of the back end in Perl and ended up with > quite a few > >> Perl lovers who spread out to other companies in > the area. > >> In particular two groups of developers left > Citysearch and > >> went to eToys (an Idealab company) and Rent.com > (not an > >> Idealab company). > >> > >> I don't know how Perl became popular at other > Idealab > >> companies and the rest of LA. I'm sure it wasn't > any one > >> person's influence unless you count Larry. > >> > >> -- > >> Eric Hammond > >> ehammond at thinksome.com > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Losangeles-pm mailing list > >> Losangeles-pm at pm.org > >> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Losangeles-pm mailing list > > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > Regards, Christian Bryant A Los Angeles Perl Monger http://la.pm.org/ Phone: 818-519-1880 E-mail: perl.monger at yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From duong.v at gmail.com Tue Aug 15 10:32:53 2006 From: duong.v at gmail.com (Duong Vu) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:32:53 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035D0@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Message-ID: <50b93bb00608151032x359ddc22obc2195f3a6ffb5f@mail.gmail.com> One of the things I've observe in our industry, and not just the Perl market, is that everyone wants seasoned veterans. No one seems to be willing to hire junior anything in IT anymore. In order for there more competent Perl developers with experience, Perl companies need to be willing to hire and train young undeveloped talents. Young kids out of college will commit themselves to what ever pays the bills more often than what suites their personal interests or likes. And very often, these kids won't know what they like yet. Java/.Net with its many more jobs will be much more attractive to them. In order for there to be more Perl shops, there need to be more Perl developers. And if we want more Perl developers, we need to recruit, train, and give them enough experiences so they are desirable. Duong On 8/15/06, Eric Gradman wrote: > When I was a Perl Monger at Oversee.net, I conducted a sobering > interview. We had a candidate come in the door with a strong command > of Perl (a rare event to be sure). During the interview it came out > that he was learning Java. I asked him why, and he explained that > former colleagues at Idealab had complained that due to the extreme > difficulty of finding competent Perl programmers, they were > increasingly starting new development projects in Java. My jaw > dropped, and I spent the rest of the interview in shock. > > Personally, I'm avoiding learning anything at all about Perl 6... I > worry that if I fall in love with new language features that I can't > use in a production environment for a decade, I'll have switch to a > different language that scratches that itch. And despite their > faults, Python and Ruby have a lot of compelling features. > > On Aug 14, 2006, at 12:59 PM, Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote: > > > While perl is very popular in LA, we should note that I'm hearing > > that perl > > is being supplanted in a number of industries by languages like > > Python. For > > example, python used more and more for movie industry "pipelining" > > applications where images are pipelined through image processors > > until they > > are then consolidated again for the final production. I've heard > > that this > > industry was mostly perl and now may be as much 50/50 perl/python. > > The perl > > foundation has to take this type of a shift seriously. I think each > > engineer > > thinks in terms of their own, individual needs (which is > > understandable), > > but the perl foundation needs to see perl in the context of a changing > > industry. I know that they are and do take these points seriously. I > > recently met with two perl foundation members to discuss this very > > point. > > > > I only mentioned ruby on rails in an earlier post since many people > > "stick" > > with the language that scratched their earliest itches. This was > > clearly the > > case for many PHP people. If perl is the language of choice only > > for ad-hoc > > automation scripts or large-scale, complex solutions on the other > > extreme, > > then you run the risk of having your potential "new blood" siphoned > > off by > > other technologies that allow for the building of modest, but complete > > solutions with lower learning curves. All groups/organizations/ > > entities need > > to think in terms of the overall "health" of the community (e.g., > > maintaining a flow of new members, satisfying the needs of existing > > members, > > etc.). > > > > Todd > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org > >> [mailto:losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org] On > >> Behalf Of Eric Hammond > >> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 12:26 PM > >> To: James Pitts > >> Cc: losangeles-pm at pm.org > >> Subject: Re: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA > >> > >> James Pitts wrote: > >>> Perl seems to be a strong thread throughout the Idealabs companies. > >>> For those of you who worked at Shopzilla, eToys, and Citysearch, do > >>> you know any of the history about how Bill Gross' companies became > >>> perl shops? Was there a perl advocate from Caltech or JPL on the > >>> Idealabs staff? > >> > >> I am pretty sure I can take credit for being the first Perl > >> advocate at the first Idealab company. I was one of the > >> first technology folks hired at Citysearch and was writing > >> and pushing Perl there in July 1996. > >> I was previously coding Perl (and C, C++, etc) in Cincinnati > >> before Caskey (18 at the time) asked me to move to LA for Citysearch. > >> > >> Though the Citysearch development team was not able to switch > >> the front end to Perl until after I left, we did code large > >> chunks of the back end in Perl and ended up with quite a few > >> Perl lovers who spread out to other companies in the area. > >> In particular two groups of developers left Citysearch and > >> went to eToys (an Idealab company) and Rent.com (not an > >> Idealab company). > >> > >> I don't know how Perl became popular at other Idealab > >> companies and the rest of LA. I'm sure it wasn't any one > >> person's influence unless you count Larry. > >> > >> -- > >> Eric Hammond > >> ehammond at thinksome.com > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Losangeles-pm mailing list > >> Losangeles-pm at pm.org > >> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Losangeles-pm mailing list > > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > From nick at ccl4.org Tue Aug 15 10:45:44 2006 From: nick at ccl4.org (Nicholas Clark) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:45:44 +0100 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <50b93bb00608151032x359ddc22obc2195f3a6ffb5f@mail.gmail.com> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035D0@pasmail3.office.tmcs> <50b93bb00608151032x359ddc22obc2195f3a6ffb5f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060815174541.GA5342@plum.flirble.org> I read this: > On 8/15/06, Eric Gradman wrote: > > that he was learning Java. I asked him why, and he explained that > > former colleagues at Idealab had complained that due to the extreme > > difficulty of finding competent Perl programmers, they were > > increasingly starting new development projects in Java. My jaw > > dropped, and I spent the rest of the interview in shock. And was about to write this very reply: On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:32:53AM -0700, Duong Vu wrote: > One of the things I've observe in our industry, and not just the Perl > market, is that everyone wants seasoned veterans. No one seems to be > willing to hire junior anything in IT anymore. > > In order for there more competent Perl developers with experience, > Perl companies need to be willing to hire and train young undeveloped > talents. Young kids out of college will commit themselves to what ever > pays the bills more often than what suites their personal interests or > likes. And very often, these kids won't know what they like yet. > Java/.Net with its many more jobs will be much more attractive to > them. > > In order for there to be more Perl shops, there need to be more Perl > developers. And if we want more Perl developers, we need to recruit, > train, and give them enough experiences so they are desirable. (So now I'm guilty of the Usenet sin not trimming any of it) The only thing I can add is that nowhere I've worked has had any sort of process of mentoring junior perl programmers into competent, senior perl programmers. Every firm seems to expect to hire senior people straight out, which isn't sustainable, as it gives no consideration to who is going to train the next iteration. This sort of naive policy *does* work with C, C++ or Java programmers (for example, and for accountants, for that matter), because there are degree courses churning them out, and there are large consulting firms that recruit smart young things straight out of university and indoctrinate them into their way of doing things. Although based on a straw poll of one at a previous job, whilst the C++ programmer we hired ex-Logica was competent, he didn't have anywhere near the breadth of knowledge that the self taught open source hacking C++ programmer knew. So I'm not convinced that these mass production factories are the answer either. So, next question, how many recruiters/hiring managers on this list are looking to recruit smart juniors and mentor them up? Nicholas Clark From Craig.McLane at ticketmaster.com Tue Aug 15 11:09:12 2006 From: Craig.McLane at ticketmaster.com (Craig McLane) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:09:12 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA Message-ID: Of the 8 software engineers we have hired in the last 12 months 6 were hired with the knowledge that we would need to provide them training or mentoring in Perl. Several of them had prior experience in other languages so they weren't junior by any means, but in all cases we planed on helping develop their software engineering and Perl skills. Craig -----Original Message----- The only thing I can add is that nowhere I've worked has had any sort of process of mentoring junior perl programmers into competent, senior perl programmers. Every firm seems to expect to hire senior people straight out, which isn't sustainable, as it gives no consideration to who is going to train the next iteration. From ehgrad at yahoo-inc.com Tue Aug 15 11:20:37 2006 From: ehgrad at yahoo-inc.com (Eric Gradman) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:20:37 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060815174541.GA5342@plum.flirble.org> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035D0@pasmail3.office.tmcs> <50b93bb00608151032x359ddc22obc2195f3a6ffb5f@mail.gmail.com> <20060815174541.GA5342@plum.flirble.org> Message-ID: <15CFA267-6A6D-4358-B8F4-92DD5A0791AA@yahoo-inc.com> At Oversee we did just that. Just to be clear, I am no longer an employee of Oversee, but I have great things to say about them. We hired good developers with good computer science skills (in whatever language), and sat them down with a Perl book. I conducted multiple "Perl Boot Camps." New developers' first couple weeks with the company were spent learning basic Perl, templating (TT), MVC design patterns, and database interaction. What I noticed is that even a few months developing commercial software (in any language) made a new hire immeasurably more apt to pick up the Perl in our dev environment. That is to say, I think the major stumbling block isn't so much the language but the patterns of development: MVC, etc. but also patterns for handling high traffic volumes, and even "how do I write code that talks to an SQL server?" That should come as no surprise, but I have a feeling that those sorts of patterns are easier to pick up in languages other than Perl. TMTOWTDI (did I get that right?) can free experienced developers from the constraints that other languages impose. Coming to Perl from C many years ago was an experience of "wow, I can write efficient code concisely in a fraction of the time with Perl" But I would not want universities to necessarily churn out new developers who know Perl. There's More Than One Way To Do It, and 95% of them are crap. Identifying that 5% is easier if you've written production code in a more structured language. On Aug 15, 2006, at 10:45 AM, Nicholas Clark wrote: > I read this: > >> On 8/15/06, Eric Gradman wrote: > >>> that he was learning Java. I asked him why, and he explained that >>> former colleagues at Idealab had complained that due to the extreme >>> difficulty of finding competent Perl programmers, they were >>> increasingly starting new development projects in Java. My jaw >>> dropped, and I spent the rest of the interview in shock. > > And was about to write this very reply: > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:32:53AM -0700, Duong Vu wrote: >> One of the things I've observe in our industry, and not just the Perl >> market, is that everyone wants seasoned veterans. No one seems to be >> willing to hire junior anything in IT anymore. >> >> In order for there more competent Perl developers with experience, >> Perl companies need to be willing to hire and train young undeveloped >> talents. Young kids out of college will commit themselves to what >> ever >> pays the bills more often than what suites their personal >> interests or >> likes. And very often, these kids won't know what they like yet. >> Java/.Net with its many more jobs will be much more attractive to >> them. >> >> In order for there to be more Perl shops, there need to be more Perl >> developers. And if we want more Perl developers, we need to recruit, >> train, and give them enough experiences so they are desirable. > > (So now I'm guilty of the Usenet sin not trimming any of it) > > The only thing I can add is that nowhere I've worked has had any > sort of > process of mentoring junior perl programmers into competent, senior > perl > programmers. Every firm seems to expect to hire senior people > straight out, > which isn't sustainable, as it gives no consideration to who is > going to > train the next iteration. > > This sort of naive policy *does* work with C, C++ or Java > programmers (for > example, and for accountants, for that matter), because there are > degree > courses churning them out, and there are large consulting firms > that recruit > smart young things straight out of university and indoctrinate them > into > their way of doing things. Although based on a straw poll of one at a > previous job, whilst the C++ programmer we hired ex-Logica was > competent, he > didn't have anywhere near the breadth of knowledge that the self > taught open > source hacking C++ programmer knew. So I'm not convinced that these > mass > production factories are the answer either. > > So, next question, how many recruiters/hiring managers on this list > are > looking to recruit smart juniors and mentor them up? > > Nicholas Clark > > From kevin+lapm at scaldeferri.com Tue Aug 15 12:20:21 2006 From: kevin+lapm at scaldeferri.com (Kevin Scaldeferri) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:20:21 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060815174541.GA5342@plum.flirble.org> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D4035D0@pasmail3.office.tmcs> <50b93bb00608151032x359ddc22obc2195f3a6ffb5f@mail.gmail.com> <20060815174541.GA5342@plum.flirble.org> Message-ID: <0e554e27134781886541157d9a7d5348@scaldeferri.com> On Aug 15, 2006, at 10:45 AM, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > So, next question, how many recruiters/hiring managers on this list are > looking to recruit smart juniors and mentor them up? > We (Overture/Yahoo Search Marketing) absolutely did bring people in as summer interns, and frequently hired them full-time after graduation. Personally, I never used perl knowledge as a filter, even when hiring for jobs that were primarily perl programming. (Well, that's not quite true. If someone claimed to be a perl whiz but couldn't correctly answer intermediate perl questions, that would get them the axe.) What was a problem in my view was the number of people, at any level of experience, who couldn't answer questions about freshman level CS: basic data structures and the like. -kevin From Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com Tue Aug 15 12:28:42 2006 From: Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com (Todd Cranston-Cuebas) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:28:42 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA Message-ID: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D403601@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Duong, I can't agree with you more. One of my main concerns is that the industry as a whole needs to have more of a "grow your own" philosophy. When the industry was "down" a few years box, nobody hired juniors at all. It's not that surprising that a 3-4 years later, there are no mid-level people now. Basically, the funnel ran dry and it's time to fill up the funnel again. Todd > -----Original Message----- > From: losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org > [mailto:losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org] On > Behalf Of Duong Vu > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:33 AM > To: Eric Gradman > Cc: losangeles-pm at pm.org > Subject: Re: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA > > One of the things I've observe in our industry, and not just > the Perl market, is that everyone wants seasoned veterans. No > one seems to be willing to hire junior anything in IT anymore. > > In order for there more competent Perl developers with > experience, Perl companies need to be willing to hire and > train young undeveloped talents. Young kids out of college > will commit themselves to what ever pays the bills more often > than what suites their personal interests or likes. And very > often, these kids won't know what they like yet. > Java/.Net with its many more jobs will be much more > attractive to them. > > In order for there to be more Perl shops, there need to be > more Perl developers. And if we want more Perl developers, we > need to recruit, train, and give them enough experiences so > they are desirable. > > Duong > > On 8/15/06, Eric Gradman wrote: > > When I was a Perl Monger at Oversee.net, I conducted a sobering > > interview. We had a candidate come in the door with a > strong command > > of Perl (a rare event to be sure). During the interview it > came out > > that he was learning Java. I asked him why, and he explained that > > former colleagues at Idealab had complained that due to the extreme > > difficulty of finding competent Perl programmers, they were > > increasingly starting new development projects in Java. My jaw > > dropped, and I spent the rest of the interview in shock. > > > > Personally, I'm avoiding learning anything at all about Perl 6... I > > worry that if I fall in love with new language features > that I can't > > use in a production environment for a decade, I'll have switch to a > > different language that scratches that itch. And despite their > > faults, Python and Ruby have a lot of compelling features. > > > > On Aug 14, 2006, at 12:59 PM, Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote: > > > > > While perl is very popular in LA, we should note that I'm hearing > > > that perl is being supplanted in a number of industries > by languages > > > like Python. For example, python used more and more for movie > > > industry "pipelining" > > > applications where images are pipelined through image processors > > > until they are then consolidated again for the final production. > > > I've heard that this industry was mostly perl and now may > be as much > > > 50/50 perl/python. > > > The perl > > > foundation has to take this type of a shift seriously. I > think each > > > engineer thinks in terms of their own, individual needs (which is > > > understandable), but the perl foundation needs to see perl in the > > > context of a changing industry. I know that they are and do take > > > these points seriously. I recently met with two perl foundation > > > members to discuss this very point. > > > > > > I only mentioned ruby on rails in an earlier post since > many people > > > "stick" > > > with the language that scratched their earliest itches. This was > > > clearly the case for many PHP people. If perl is the language of > > > choice only for ad-hoc automation scripts or large-scale, complex > > > solutions on the other extreme, then you run the risk of > having your > > > potential "new blood" siphoned off by other technologies > that allow > > > for the building of modest, but complete solutions with lower > > > learning curves. All groups/organizations/ entities need > to think in > > > terms of the overall "health" of the community (e.g., > maintaining a > > > flow of new members, satisfying the needs of existing members, > > > etc.). > > > > > > Todd > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org > > >> [mailto:losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org] On > > >> Behalf Of Eric Hammond > > >> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 12:26 PM > > >> To: James Pitts > > >> Cc: losangeles-pm at pm.org > > >> Subject: Re: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA > > >> > > >> James Pitts wrote: > > >>> Perl seems to be a strong thread throughout the > Idealabs companies. > > >>> For those of you who worked at Shopzilla, eToys, and > Citysearch, > > >>> do you know any of the history about how Bill Gross' companies > > >>> became perl shops? Was there a perl advocate from > Caltech or JPL > > >>> on the Idealabs staff? > > >> > > >> I am pretty sure I can take credit for being the first Perl > > >> advocate at the first Idealab company. I was one of the first > > >> technology folks hired at Citysearch and was writing and pushing > > >> Perl there in July 1996. > > >> I was previously coding Perl (and C, C++, etc) in > Cincinnati before > > >> Caskey (18 at the time) asked me to move to LA for Citysearch. > > >> > > >> Though the Citysearch development team was not able to > switch the > > >> front end to Perl until after I left, we did code large > chunks of > > >> the back end in Perl and ended up with quite a few Perl > lovers who > > >> spread out to other companies in the area. > > >> In particular two groups of developers left Citysearch > and went to > > >> eToys (an Idealab company) and Rent.com (not an Idealab company). > > >> > > >> I don't know how Perl became popular at other Idealab > companies and > > >> the rest of LA. I'm sure it wasn't any one person's influence > > >> unless you count Larry. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Eric Hammond > > >> ehammond at thinksome.com > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Losangeles-pm mailing list > > >> Losangeles-pm at pm.org > > >> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Losangeles-pm mailing list > > > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Losangeles-pm mailing list > > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > > > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > From Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com Tue Aug 15 12:37:55 2006 From: Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com (Todd Cranston-Cuebas) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:37:55 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA Message-ID: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D403602@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Nicholas, As an organization, Ticketmaster has supported the growth of engineers. We have a number of positions where people who are not "full-fledged" engineers can join the organization and get exposure to our development teams, QA groups, operations teams, etc. For instance, we have roles in our application support group where you get a birds-eye view of the systems and teams that come together to essentially become Ticketmaster.com. In this role, the app support engineer can build their perl skills writing utilities for their team while seeing how a very large, enterprise-wide system works. A junior engineer has to be willing to spend some time in this role to learn and grow and understand that they will not be heads down coding all day. They will be learning and supporting a mission-critical application. On the other hand, we do also bring in very bright junior engineers directly into our engineering teams. Typically, these associate-level engineers are really quite exceptional in terms of their drive, ambition, love of the technology as a whole, etc., but clearly may lack real-world work experience, skills, and knowledge. Basically, I do my best to keep my eyes out for talent that can be groomed into a solid engineer. Drive, ambition, and a proven ability to "create" through either open-source projects or even part-time employment during school, all help. In our case, being solid in perl is really a major plus. I can't always make these roles available, but we do our best to accommodate the available market (i.e., if someone is available with these basic traits, we'll do our best to make a role available). Todd > -----Original Message----- > From: losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org > [mailto:losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org] On > Behalf Of Nicholas Clark > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:46 AM > To: Duong Vu > Cc: losangeles-pm at pm.org > Subject: Re: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA > > I read this: > > > On 8/15/06, Eric Gradman wrote: > > > > that he was learning Java. I asked him why, and he > explained that > > > former colleagues at Idealab had complained that due to > the extreme > > > difficulty of finding competent Perl programmers, they were > > > increasingly starting new development projects in Java. My jaw > > > dropped, and I spent the rest of the interview in shock. > > And was about to write this very reply: > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:32:53AM -0700, Duong Vu wrote: > > One of the things I've observe in our industry, and not > just the Perl > > market, is that everyone wants seasoned veterans. No one > seems to be > > willing to hire junior anything in IT anymore. > > > > In order for there more competent Perl developers with experience, > > Perl companies need to be willing to hire and train young > undeveloped > > talents. Young kids out of college will commit themselves > to what ever > > pays the bills more often than what suites their personal > interests or > > likes. And very often, these kids won't know what they like yet. > > Java/.Net with its many more jobs will be much more attractive to > > them. > > > > In order for there to be more Perl shops, there need to be > more Perl > > developers. And if we want more Perl developers, we need to > recruit, > > train, and give them enough experiences so they are desirable. > > (So now I'm guilty of the Usenet sin not trimming any of it) > > The only thing I can add is that nowhere I've worked has had > any sort of process of mentoring junior perl programmers into > competent, senior perl programmers. Every firm seems to > expect to hire senior people straight out, which isn't > sustainable, as it gives no consideration to who is going to > train the next iteration. > > This sort of naive policy *does* work with C, C++ or Java > programmers (for example, and for accountants, for that > matter), because there are degree courses churning them out, > and there are large consulting firms that recruit smart young > things straight out of university and indoctrinate them into > their way of doing things. Although based on a straw poll of > one at a previous job, whilst the C++ programmer we hired > ex-Logica was competent, he didn't have anywhere near the > breadth of knowledge that the self taught open source hacking > C++ programmer knew. So I'm not convinced that these mass > production factories are the answer either. > > So, next question, how many recruiters/hiring managers on > this list are looking to recruit smart juniors and mentor them up? > > Nicholas Clark > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > From perl.monger at yahoo.com Tue Aug 15 13:18:01 2006 From: perl.monger at yahoo.com (Christian Bryant) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:18:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA Message-ID: <20060815201801.66088.qmail@web39811.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Hehe ;) That was a light-hearted prod, and I just realized that I hadn't finished my thought with a smile :) The folks in the Thousand Oaks PM and guys at Value Click are great ;) Keep up the good work guys ;) This just happens to be where I get my most essential Perl info, so, hats off to Ticketmaster and the LA PM for keeping us all on-topic, and always keeping the information critical. - CB > > --- Todd Cranston-Cuebas > wrote: > > > Christian, > > > > Glad to hear ;) > > > > Todd > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Christian Bryant > > [mailto:perl.monger at yahoo.com] > > > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 8:15 PM > > > To: Todd Cranston-Cuebas > > > Cc: losangeles-pm at pm.org > > > Subject: Re: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA > > > > > > > > > On a completely side note, did Randal ever > appear > > at > > > Ticketmaster? We had just wrapped up our Perl > > training with > > > Mr. Sherer of the TO PM, when we learned > Schwartz > > was, then > > > wasn't showing up at Value Click. > > > Personally, I'd prefer Ticketmaster where all > the > > real Perl > > > elite work... > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Christian Bryant > > > A Los Angeles Perl Monger > > > http://la.pm.org/ > > > Phone: 818-519-1880 > > > E-mail: perl.monger at yahoo.com > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > protection > > > around http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > Regards, > > Christian Bryant > A Los Angeles Perl Monger > http://la.pm.org/ > http://thousand-oaks-perl.org/bin/view/Main/ChristianBryant > Phone: 310-479-3293 > E-mail: perl.monger at yahoo.com > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > Regards, Christian Bryant A Los Angeles Perl Monger http://la.pm.org/ http://thousand-oaks-perl.org/bin/view/Main/ChristianBryant Phone: 310-479-3293 E-mail: perl.monger at yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From apisoni at shopzilla.com Thu Aug 17 11:18:03 2006 From: apisoni at shopzilla.com (Adam Pisoni) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:18:03 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D403602@pasmail3.office.tmcs> References: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D403602@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Message-ID: <93DEE264-D91F-4E79-B5E3-DEDB2FE9859F@shopzilla.com> I gave up using knowledge of Perl as a filter for engineers a while ago. I found that the vast majority of people responding to our add for Perl engineers did not have a firm enough grasp of OO architecture and design. So now I basically use general engineering and OO proficiency as my main filter. That said, people with a firm grasp of OO often use Perl as a way of filtering out us. Obviously I have to tell them they will be learning and working with Perl. Its hard to find people who are passionate about OO, but are also interested in learning/using Perl. The hardcore OO people moving away from Java or C++ tend to be moving towards languages like Python and Ruby. I have no problem teaching someone Perl, but it takes far to long to turn a functional programmer into an OO programmer. Thanks, Adam On Aug 15, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote: > Nicholas, > > As an organization, Ticketmaster has supported the growth of > engineers. We > have a number of positions where people who are not "full-fledged" > engineers > can join the organization and get exposure to our development > teams, QA > groups, operations teams, etc. For instance, we have roles in our > application support group where you get a birds-eye view of the > systems and > teams that come together to essentially become Ticketmaster.com. In > this > role, the app support engineer can build their perl skills writing > utilities > for their team while seeing how a very large, enterprise-wide > system works. > A junior engineer has to be willing to spend some time in this role > to learn > and grow and understand that they will not be heads down coding all > day. > They will be learning and supporting a mission-critical application. > > On the other hand, we do also bring in very bright junior engineers > directly > into our engineering teams. Typically, these associate-level > engineers are > really quite exceptional in terms of their drive, ambition, love of > the > technology as a whole, etc., but clearly may lack real-world work > experience, skills, and knowledge. Basically, I do my best to keep > my eyes > out for talent that can be groomed into a solid engineer. Drive, > ambition, > and a proven ability to "create" through either open-source > projects or even > part-time employment during school, all help. In our case, being > solid in > perl is really a major plus. I can't always make these roles > available, but > we do our best to accommodate the available market (i.e., if > someone is > available with these basic traits, we'll do our best to make a role > available). > > Todd > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org >> [mailto:losangeles-pm-bounces+tcc=ticketmaster.com at pm.org] On >> Behalf Of Nicholas Clark >> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:46 AM >> To: Duong Vu >> Cc: losangeles-pm at pm.org >> Subject: Re: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA >> >> I read this: >> >>> On 8/15/06, Eric Gradman wrote: >> >>>> that he was learning Java. I asked him why, and he >> explained that >>>> former colleagues at Idealab had complained that due to >> the extreme >>>> difficulty of finding competent Perl programmers, they were >>>> increasingly starting new development projects in Java. My jaw >>>> dropped, and I spent the rest of the interview in shock. >> >> And was about to write this very reply: >> >> On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:32:53AM -0700, Duong Vu wrote: >>> One of the things I've observe in our industry, and not >> just the Perl >>> market, is that everyone wants seasoned veterans. No one >> seems to be >>> willing to hire junior anything in IT anymore. >>> >>> In order for there more competent Perl developers with experience, >>> Perl companies need to be willing to hire and train young >> undeveloped >>> talents. Young kids out of college will commit themselves >> to what ever >>> pays the bills more often than what suites their personal >> interests or >>> likes. And very often, these kids won't know what they like yet. >>> Java/.Net with its many more jobs will be much more attractive to >>> them. >>> >>> In order for there to be more Perl shops, there need to be >> more Perl >>> developers. And if we want more Perl developers, we need to >> recruit, >>> train, and give them enough experiences so they are desirable. >> >> (So now I'm guilty of the Usenet sin not trimming any of it) >> >> The only thing I can add is that nowhere I've worked has had >> any sort of process of mentoring junior perl programmers into >> competent, senior perl programmers. Every firm seems to >> expect to hire senior people straight out, which isn't >> sustainable, as it gives no consideration to who is going to >> train the next iteration. >> >> This sort of naive policy *does* work with C, C++ or Java >> programmers (for example, and for accountants, for that >> matter), because there are degree courses churning them out, >> and there are large consulting firms that recruit smart young >> things straight out of university and indoctrinate them into >> their way of doing things. Although based on a straw poll of >> one at a previous job, whilst the C++ programmer we hired >> ex-Logica was competent, he didn't have anywhere near the >> breadth of knowledge that the self taught open source hacking >> C++ programmer knew. So I'm not convinced that these mass >> production factories are the answer either. >> >> So, next question, how many recruiters/hiring managers on >> this list are looking to recruit smart juniors and mentor them up? >> >> Nicholas Clark >> _______________________________________________ >> Losangeles-pm mailing list >> Losangeles-pm at pm.org >> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm >> > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm From ben_tilly at operamail.com Thu Aug 17 15:49:35 2006 From: ben_tilly at operamail.com (Benjamin J. Tilly) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:49:35 +0800 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA Message-ID: <20060817224935.8CD673AA3D3@ws5-8.us4.outblaze.com> "Adam Pisoni" wrote: > > I gave up using knowledge of Perl as a filter for engineers a while > ago. I found that the vast majority of people responding to our > add for Perl engineers did not have a firm enough grasp of OO > architecture and design. So now I basically use general engineering > and OO proficiency as my main filter. We use general engineering and database instead. Basically replace OO design questions with database design questions. Same general goal. Perl is a lot easier to teach than intelligence and good design sense. > That said, people with a firm > grasp of OO often use Perl as a way of filtering out us. Obviously > I have to tell them they will be learning and working with Perl. > Its hard to find people who are passionate about OO, but are also > interested in learning/using Perl. The hardcore OO people moving > away from Java or C++ tend to be moving towards languages like Python > and Ruby. We are up front about using Perl so don't have any sense of how many get filtered out. But we've been told that people who go through our interview wind up convinced that they will be working with a bright team that they will learn from. > I have no problem teaching someone Perl, but it takes far > to long to turn a functional programmer into an OO programmer. And this is the only thing I really wanted to respond to. When you say "functional programmer", I think of someone who is used to using things like higher order functions. Think MJD's Higher Order Perl. I have yet to meet someone at that level of skill who had any problem using OO techniques. The reverse is not true. What I think you meant is that it is not easy to turn an imperative programmer into an OO programmer. This I would agree with. Furthermore I would say that there are lots of people who think that they are OO programmers but who are just doing imperative programming with a slight OO facade. There isn't really anything wrong with this - it gets the job done - but it misses the point of what OO means. Ah heck, since I'm responding, let's wander off to talk about a question that Nicholas raised. About mentoring new programmers. One problem with Perl in particular is that Perl is very well suited to working with small teams of very good people. You want your team size to remain small enough that communication overhead doesn't destroy productivity, and also small enough that you can depend on everyone having enough personal discipline to avoid doing some of the spectacularly stupid things which Perl allows you to do. However such teams have very little room for including and mentoring junior programmers. By contrast a language like Java is geared towards having larger teams of less productive people. In that kind of environment you simply cannot insist that each and every person be top notch. And once you've accepted that fact, it is much easier to work junior programmers into your team, and therefore is easier to mentor them. Oh, and a side benefit, there wind up being more Java jobs. Incidentally this is not meant as a slam against Java - it seems to be a deliberate design decision. If you're going to have a large team work together, you need to limit the damage that one bozo can do. Those barriers also limit productivity, which in turn pushes team size up. And, of course, once team size reaches a certain point, you need to organize it to avoid having too many lines of communication out of self-defence. (Else, as Brooks noted, people wind up wasting more of each other's time than they can personally contribute.) At which point productivity drops even further. But now you can scale pretty well - add enough people and you can get a lot of throughput. In Perl teams that I've worked on, by contrast, the goal is to get as much done as possible with a small team. This philosophy is *great* for a startup since a good small team of highly paid people is a lot cheaper and faster than a large team of less well paid people. I haven't personally experienced it in the context of a large company, but if I stay at Rent long enough, I'm sure I'll find out. Cheers, Ben PS Like everyone else, we are looking to hire another Perl engineer and another QA person. From perl.monger at yahoo.com Fri Aug 18 11:30:43 2006 From: perl.monger at yahoo.com (Christian Bryant) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:30:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [LA.pm] Perl Tk UML Requirements GUI Message-ID: <20060818183043.4919.qmail@web39813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> I'm about to do research on what existing projects there are in the realm of requirements software written in Perl Tk. There are plenty in C++, Java and the like, but I have a specific need for the application to be Perl. On the off chance someone here has already seen something like this, here are my basic requirements: 1. Allow Tk GUI creation of UML-based Use Cases. 2. Generate Perl code from Use Case requirements (anything from templates to actual scripts). 3. Run on both GNU/Linux and UNIX flavors as well as Win32 (via Cygwin or ActiveState). If there is interest in this topic beyond this, when I find something applicable I shall post the results of the research. Much thanks. Regards, Christian Bryant A Los Angeles Perl Monger http://la.pm.org/ http://thousand-oaks-perl.org/bin/view/Main/ChristianBryant Phone: 310-479-3293 E-mail: perl.monger at yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From naterajj at gmail.com Fri Aug 18 11:55:09 2006 From: naterajj at gmail.com (Juan Jose Natera) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:55:09 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] Perl Tk UML Requirements GUI In-Reply-To: <20060818183043.4919.qmail@web39813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060818183043.4919.qmail@web39813.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <349627440608181155q4d65b430o1583baa8b2992db3@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I haven't seen anything exactly like you need it, however I have played with following projects with Ok, results. Umbrello, a UML modeler for KDE that can generate Perl Code from _class diagrams_. glade, a GTK GUI Builder that can generate perl-GTK code. If I wanted to write a Portable GUI application in Perl I think I would use wxPerl rather than Tk, that's just me though. JJ On 8/18/06, Christian Bryant wrote: > > I'm about to do research on what existing projects > there are in the realm of requirements software > written in Perl Tk. There are plenty in C++, Java and > the like, but I have a specific need for the > application to be Perl. > > On the off chance someone here has already seen > something like this, here are my basic requirements: > > 1. Allow Tk GUI creation of UML-based Use Cases. > 2. Generate Perl code from Use Case requirements > (anything from templates to actual scripts). > 3. Run on both GNU/Linux and UNIX flavors as well > as Win32 (via Cygwin or ActiveState). > > If there is interest in this topic beyond this, when I > find something applicable I shall post the results of > the research. > > Much thanks. > > > Regards, > > Christian Bryant > A Los Angeles Perl Monger > http://la.pm.org/ > http://thousand-oaks-perl.org/bin/view/Main/ChristianBryant > Phone: 310-479-3293 > E-mail: perl.monger at yahoo.com > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > From remarbach at yahoo.com Fri Aug 18 12:01:44 2006 From: remarbach at yahoo.com (Randall Marbach) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [LA.pm] Fwd: Re: Perl Tk UML Requirements GUI Message-ID: <20060818190144.69805.qmail@web39611.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --- Randall Marbach wrote: > Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:37:08 -0700 (PDT) > From: Randall Marbach > Subject: Re: [LA.pm] Perl Tk UML Requirements GUI > To: Christian Bryant > > Recently, there was an article on www.perl.com > > Generating UML and Interaction Diagrams > > > > I'd be interested in the results of your research.. > > HTH > > Randy > > --- Christian Bryant wrote: > > > > > I'm about to do research on what existing projects > > there are in the realm of requirements software > > written in Perl Tk. There are plenty in C++, Java > > and > > the like, but I have a specific need for the > > application to be Perl. > > > > On the off chance someone here has already seen > > something like this, here are my basic > requirements: > > > > 1. Allow Tk GUI creation of UML-based Use Cases. > > 2. Generate Perl code from Use Case requirements > > (anything from templates to actual scripts). > > 3. Run on both GNU/Linux and UNIX flavors as well > > as Win32 (via Cygwin or ActiveState). > > > > If there is interest in this topic beyond this, > when > > I > > find something applicable I shall post the results > > of > > the research. > > > > Much thanks. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Christian Bryant > > A Los Angeles Perl Monger > > http://la.pm.org/ > > > http://thousand-oaks-perl.org/bin/view/Main/ChristianBryant > > Phone: 310-479-3293 > > E-mail: perl.monger at yahoo.com > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Losangeles-pm mailing list > > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From perl.monger at yahoo.com Fri Aug 18 13:16:56 2006 From: perl.monger at yahoo.com (Christian Bryant) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [LA.pm] Perl Tk UML Requirements GUI In-Reply-To: <349627440608181155q4d65b430o1583baa8b2992db3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060818201656.35915.qmail@web39808.mail.mud.yahoo.com> I'm definitely moving forward with Randall's link to the UML::Sequence module. We'll see how that goes. I've also used Umbrello, but my last two companies are Microsoft-oriented, alas, and StarUML for Windows offers some nice output using MS Office formats. Such is life. However, you remind me that I've seen some very nice code that uses wxPerl. I'd need to define some technical reasons to go with that over Tk but it's really not that big an issue. As long as the whole application is well managed and portable, I'm happy. Appreciate the response. Cheers. --- Juan Jose Natera wrote: > Hi, > > I haven't seen anything exactly like you need it, > however I have > played with following projects with Ok, results. > > Umbrello, a UML modeler for KDE that can generate > Perl Code from > _class diagrams_. > glade, a GTK GUI Builder that can generate perl-GTK > code. > > If I wanted to write a Portable GUI application in > Perl I think I > would use wxPerl rather than Tk, that's just me > though. > > JJ > > > > On 8/18/06, Christian Bryant > wrote: > > > > I'm about to do research on what existing projects > > there are in the realm of requirements software > > written in Perl Tk. There are plenty in C++, Java > and > > the like, but I have a specific need for the > > application to be Perl. > > > > On the off chance someone here has already seen > > something like this, here are my basic > requirements: > > > > 1. Allow Tk GUI creation of UML-based Use Cases. > > 2. Generate Perl code from Use Case requirements > > (anything from templates to actual scripts). > > 3. Run on both GNU/Linux and UNIX flavors as well > > as Win32 (via Cygwin or ActiveState). > > > > If there is interest in this topic beyond this, > when I > > find something applicable I shall post the results > of > > the research. > > > > Much thanks. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Christian Bryant > > A Los Angeles Perl Monger > > http://la.pm.org/ > > > http://thousand-oaks-perl.org/bin/view/Main/ChristianBryant > > Phone: 310-479-3293 > > E-mail: perl.monger at yahoo.com > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Losangeles-pm mailing list > > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > > > Regards, Christian Bryant A Los Angeles Perl Monger http://la.pm.org/ http://thousand-oaks-perl.org/bin/view/Main/ChristianBryant Phone: 310-479-3293 E-mail: perl.monger at yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From apisoni at shopzilla.com Fri Aug 18 13:32:33 2006 From: apisoni at shopzilla.com (Adam Pisoni) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:32:33 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060817224935.8CD673AA3D3@ws5-8.us4.outblaze.com> References: <20060817224935.8CD673AA3D3@ws5-8.us4.outblaze.com> Message-ID: Ben, I concur on Perl being best for teams of really smart people. In my experience, one junior programmer can more than do his/her weight in damage for a long time to come. We just fixed a bug on our site last week caused by an engineer who was let go of 2 years ago. That's why its even MORE important when hiring Perl programmers that you hire very skilled engineers (even if their not Perl gurus). Do we know anyone who's worked in a team of Ruby, Python and/or PHP engineers to see if they have similar sentiments? Thanks, Adam On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Benjamin J. Tilly wrote: > "Adam Pisoni" wrote: >> >> I gave up using knowledge of Perl as a filter for engineers a while >> ago. I found that the vast majority of people responding to our >> add for Perl engineers did not have a firm enough grasp of OO >> architecture and design. So now I basically use general engineering >> and OO proficiency as my main filter. > > We use general engineering and database instead. Basically replace > OO design questions with database design questions. Same general > goal. Perl is a lot easier to teach than intelligence and good > design sense. > >> That said, people with a firm >> grasp of OO often use Perl as a way of filtering out us. Obviously >> I have to tell them they will be learning and working with Perl. >> Its hard to find people who are passionate about OO, but are also >> interested in learning/using Perl. The hardcore OO people moving >> away from Java or C++ tend to be moving towards languages like Python >> and Ruby. > > We are up front about using Perl so don't have any sense of how > many get filtered out. But we've been told that people who go > through our interview wind up convinced that they will be working > with a bright team that they will learn from. > >> I have no problem teaching someone Perl, but it takes far >> to long to turn a functional programmer into an OO programmer. > > And this is the only thing I really wanted to respond to. > > When you say "functional programmer", I think of someone who is > used to using things like higher order functions. Think MJD's > Higher Order Perl. I have yet to meet someone at that level of > skill who had any problem using OO techniques. The reverse is not > true. > > What I think you meant is that it is not easy to turn an imperative > programmer into an OO programmer. This I would agree with. > Furthermore I would say that there are lots of people who think > that they are OO programmers but who are just doing imperative > programming with a slight OO facade. There isn't really anything > wrong with this - it gets the job done - but it misses the point of > what OO means. > > Ah heck, since I'm responding, let's wander off to talk about a > question that Nicholas raised. > > About mentoring new programmers. One problem with Perl in > particular is that Perl is very well suited to working with small > teams of very good people. You want your team size to remain small > enough that communication overhead doesn't destroy productivity, > and also small enough that you can depend on everyone having enough > personal discipline to avoid doing some of the spectacularly stupid > things which Perl allows you to do. However such teams have very > little room for including and mentoring junior programmers. > > By contrast a language like Java is geared towards having larger > teams of less productive people. In that kind of environment you > simply cannot insist that each and every person be top notch. And > once you've accepted that fact, it is much easier to work junior > programmers into your team, and therefore is easier to mentor > them. Oh, and a side benefit, there wind up being more Java jobs. > > Incidentally this is not meant as a slam against Java - it seems to > be a deliberate design decision. If you're going to have a large > team work together, you need to limit the damage that one bozo can > do. Those barriers also limit productivity, which in turn pushes > team size up. And, of course, once team size reaches a certain > point, you need to organize it to avoid having too many lines of > communication out of self-defence. (Else, as Brooks noted, people > wind up wasting more of each other's time than they can personally > contribute.) At which point productivity drops even further. But > now you can scale pretty well - add enough people and you can get a > lot of throughput. > > In Perl teams that I've worked on, by contrast, the goal is to get > as much done as possible with a small team. This philosophy is > *great* for a startup since a good small team of highly paid people > is a lot cheaper and faster than a large team of less well paid > people. I haven't personally experienced it in the context of a > large company, but if I stay at Rent long enough, I'm sure I'll > find out. > > Cheers, > Ben > > PS Like everyone else, we are looking to hire another Perl engineer > and another QA person. From jleader at alumni.caltech.edu Fri Aug 18 18:05:54 2006 From: jleader at alumni.caltech.edu (Jeremy Leader) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:05:54 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] [JOB] Perl Hacker, SQL (in Sunnyvale) Message-ID: <44E663F2.3040100@alumni.caltech.edu> I don't usually do this, but it seems somewhat relevant to the recent discussions about Perl jobs, though it's up North in Sunnyvale. Besides, if you mention my name, and you get hired, I could get a bonus ;) -- Jeremy Leader jleader at alumni.caltech.edu leaderj at yahoo-inc.com (work) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Job No.: RX1000013194 Location: US - Sunnyvale Job Function: ENGINEERING / INFO. SYSTEMS Are you a motivated perl hacker? ... a self starter needing little supervisions? ... interested in developer support tools? Then the platform engineering team is looking for you! Come join us and build the next generation of host configuration, package management, and release engineering tools used by Yahoo! developers worldwide. Ideal candidates should be able to develop working relationships with members of the various engineering teams at Yahoo! Basic Qualifications: Perl and Unix is required. Preferred Qualifications: A BS/MS in Computer Science or equivalent and 4+ years experience Experience with SQL, PHP, Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and Makefiles a plus Yahoo! Inc is an equal opportunity employer. For more information or to search all of our openings, please visit http://careers.yahoo.com HJIIT10 From ben_tilly at operamail.com Fri Aug 18 18:07:26 2006 From: ben_tilly at operamail.com (Benjamin J. Tilly) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 09:07:26 +0800 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA Message-ID: <20060819010726.E1D8D3AA3D3@ws5-8.us4.outblaze.com> "Adam Pisoni" wrote: > > Ben, > > I concur on Perl being best for teams of really smart people. In > my experience, one junior programmer can more than do his/her > weight in damage for a long time to come. We just fixed a bug on > our site last week caused by an engineer who was let go of 2 years > ago. That's why its even MORE important when hiring Perl > programmers that you hire very skilled engineers (even if their > not Perl gurus). I think our policy is to blame all bugs on the person who most recently left the team. Right, Eric? :-) Based on lots of theory, I believe that a good solution to both problems is to use lots of code reviews - don't let any code go into production without having it reviewed. This both limits damage from junior programmers and causes lots of mentoring to happen. Which also means that junior people don't remain junior for long. There are other benefits, for instance IBM's research indicates that code reviews are the most cost effective form of QA. But as great as the theory is, I don't have much practical experience with that approach. And there are drawbacks. Primary among them being the fact that many programmers will get upset when their code is reviewed by someone else in detail. Plus the visible overhead is hard for a lot of people to swallow. Still I'd like that environment. > Do we know anyone who's worked in a team of Ruby, Python and/or PHP > engineers to see if they have similar sentiments? Important caveat. Do we know anyone GOOD who has worked in those languages to see what their sentiments are? There are lots of programmers out there. Most aren't very good. I'm only really interested in the opinions of the good minority. PHP in particular attracts lots of bad programmers. Not their fault - it comes with being the most popular entry language for non-programmers who want to do cool stuff. A few years ago Perl suffered from the same phenomena. (Still does to some extent, but not as badly.) That isn't to say that there aren't some really, really good PHP people out there. There are. But I'm going to discount anything I hear from a PHP programmer until I get convinced that they know what they are doing. In fact we do have someone who can offer an opinion. Robert, speak up. I understand that you've been working in Python at Google. That's relevant experience. Say something. :-) > Thanks, > Adam Cheers, Ben > On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Benjamin J. Tilly wrote: [...] > > Ah heck, since I'm responding, let's wander off to talk about a > > question that Nicholas raised. > > > > About mentoring new programmers. One problem with Perl in > > particular is that Perl is very well suited to working with small > > teams of very good people. You want your team size to remain > > small enough that communication overhead doesn't destroy > > productivity, and also small enough that you can depend on > > everyone having enough personal discipline to avoid doing some > > of the spectacularly stupid things which Perl allows you to do. > > However such teams have very little room for including and > > mentoring junior programmers. > > > > By contrast a language like Java is geared towards having larger > > teams of less productive people. In that kind of environment you > > simply cannot insist that each and every person be top notch. > > And once you've accepted that fact, it is much easier to work > > junior programmers into your team, and therefore is easier to > > mentor them. Oh, and a side benefit, there wind up being more > > Java jobs. > > > > Incidentally this is not meant as a slam against Java - it seems > > to be a deliberate design decision. If you're going to have a > > large team work together, you need to limit the damage that one > > bozo can do. Those barriers also limit productivity, which in > > turn pushes team size up. And, of course, once team size > > reaches a certain point, you need to organize it to avoid having > > too many lines of communication out of self-defence. (Else, as > > Brooks noted, people wind up wasting more of each other's time > > than they can personally contribute.) At which point > > productivity drops even further. But now you can scale pretty > > well - add enough people and you can get a lot of throughput. > > > > In Perl teams that I've worked on, by contrast, the goal is to > > get as much done as possible with a small team. This philosophy > > is *great* for a startup since a good small team of highly paid > > people is a lot cheaper and faster than a large team of less > > well paid people. I haven't personally experienced it in the > > context of a large company, but if I stay at Rent long enough, > > I'm sure I'll find out. > > > > Cheers, > > Ben > > > > PS Like everyone else, we are looking to hire another Perl > > engineer and another QA person. > From geoff at modperlcookbook.org Fri Aug 18 20:52:15 2006 From: geoff at modperlcookbook.org (Geoffrey Young) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:52:15 -0400 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060819010726.E1D8D3AA3D3@ws5-8.us4.outblaze.com> References: <20060819010726.E1D8D3AA3D3@ws5-8.us4.outblaze.com> Message-ID: <44E68AEF.4090007@modperlcookbook.org> > Based on lots of theory, I believe that a good solution to > both problems is to use lots of code reviews - don't let > any code go into production without having it reviewed. > This both limits damage from junior programmers and causes > lots of mentoring to happen. Which also means that junior > people don't remain junior for long. There are other > benefits, for instance IBM's research indicates that code > reviews are the most cost effective form of QA. > > But as great as the theory is, I don't have much practical > experience with that approach. And there are drawbacks. > Primary among them being the fact that many programmers > will get upset when their code is reviewed by someone else > in detail. Plus the visible overhead is hard for a lot of > people to swallow. Still I'd like that environment. I worked for a few years at andersen consulting (which has since been renamed accenture) and we did just that - _every_ piece of code went through a _formal_ code review process before it hit production, where we all got packets (sometimes very large packets) and went over the code line by line, discussing lesser things like style and conformity, to drawing on people's experience, both as just plain coders as well as people who understood the systems we were integrating with. yeah, it was an intensive process, but we were consultants so we just billed for it :) but the culture was there from the get-go for me, so I never saw a programmer get upset by the things that came out of the code reviews, and never got upset myself. but I can see how trying to enforce that kind of environment where one doesn't exist currently could be, um, difficult. then again, much of the open source project world works like a never ending code review, with people sometimes being far less "corporate" about their opinions. so if you are already of the mind to hire people with open source experience, people used to sending in patches and reworking them and, in general, fitting in with a project and whatnot, then it shouldn't be that hard to figure out how to institute some kind of code review. personally, I see commit emails as a very simple way to go about this, since it's a format lots of people are used to and the review and discussion can happen naturally... for those willing to take the time to read the diffs :) anyway, just some random thoughts late on a friday night :) --Geoff From ben_tilly at operamail.com Fri Aug 18 22:18:29 2006 From: ben_tilly at operamail.com (Benjamin J. Tilly) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 13:18:29 +0800 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA Message-ID: <20060819051829.BE9F13AA3D3@ws5-8.us4.outblaze.com> "Kevin Scaldeferri" wrote: > > On Aug 18, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Adam Pisoni wrote: > [...] > > We just fixed a bug on our site > > last week caused by an engineer who was let go of 2 years ago. > > Hey, if you didn't notice the bug for 2 years, how bad can it be? > (Tongue in cheek -- a bug that costs an imperceptible fraction of > a percent of revenue for years is much more expensive than one that > costs 10% and is, therefore, noticed and fixed in hours.) I wouldn't be confident that a bug that costs 10% of revenue is fixed in hours. In fact we had one in recent memory which went undetected for over half a year! In our defense, our business has such long lead times that it can be very hard to figure out what the connection is between action and reaction. So it really was hard to track down that THIS change caused THAT result. Furthermore I cannot count how many simple changes we've found that produce more than a 5% increase in revenue. We're not talking rocket science. In one case removing obvious instructions from a form made it look simpler, so more people completed it. In another example adding the right graphics did the trick. Not doing those things isn't really a *bug*, but it goes to show how hard it can be for an organization to notice money left on the table. We notice these things because we've learned to look for them. My sense is that very few organizations even measure what they'd need to to find them. Let alone make looking for improvements a standard procedure. Cheers, Ben From mackenziemikebus at yahoo.com Sat Aug 19 22:59:22 2006 From: mackenziemikebus at yahoo.com (Mike MacKenzie) Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060815174541.GA5342@plum.flirble.org> Message-ID: <20060820055922.47192.qmail@web52201.mail.yahoo.com> --- Nicholas Clark wrote: > > So, next question, how many recruiters/hiring managers on this list are > looking to recruit smart juniors and mentor them up? > We (at Language Weaver) recently hired a 'junior programmer' -- pretty much fresh out of college, and I've been mentoring him in Perl. It turns out, though, that I'm spending at least as much time helping him think through design issues that are general in nature and not specific to Perl as I am actually teaching him Perl. He gets most of the Perl knowledge (though not all) from books and looking at existing code. Mike MacKenzie __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From lapm at veggiechinese.net Tue Aug 22 16:00:35 2006 From: lapm at veggiechinese.net (William Yardley) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:00:35 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] Fwd: PriceGrabber.com Sr. Software Engr Message-ID: <20060822230035.GF16551@mitch.veggiechinese.net> We're apparently hiring as well... *************** PriceGrabber.com Senior Software Engineer Located in Los Angeles, PriceGrabber.com is a leading online comparison shopping service that helps over 18 million consumers quickly and effectively find the items they are seeking along with researching products, services, sellers, and prices prior to making a purchase decision. PriceGrabber.com, a rapidly growing, highly profitable, private Internet company founded in 1999, was recently named the 5th fastest growing technology company nationwide by the Deloitte Fast 500 and has received numerous other industry awards. Our systems are the core of the PriceGrabber.com enterprise - we build the engine that drives a great user interface and experience! Our success is based on hiring talented people and we are seeking a full time Senior Software Engineer to help us develop innovative applications. Responsibilities: * Design and implement new solutions, or refine and optimize existing code in the core layer of the system * Develop and maintain applications written in Perl and PHP, operating in a Linux, Apache, and MySQL environment Required skills: * Thorough software engineering experience (minimum 6 years) designing and implementing large scale distributed systems * Expert knowledge of Perl (minimum 5 years) * Expert knowledge of SQL and relational database experience (minimum 5 years) * Thorough knowledge of Linux * Good knowledge of Apache and HTML * Good software architecture and debugging skills * Ability to work collaboratively in a shared code environment * Ability to work effectively with evolving requirements and minimal supervision * Good communication skills To express interest in this position, please send resume and code samples to jobs at pricegrabber.com and write "Senior Software Engineer" in the subject line. From rspier at pobox.com Sun Aug 27 19:17:26 2006 From: rspier at pobox.com (Robert Spier) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:17:26 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] contrasting London and LA In-Reply-To: <20060819010726.E1D8D3AA3D3@ws5-8.us4.outblaze.com> References: <20060819010726.E1D8D3AA3D3@ws5-8.us4.outblaze.com> Message-ID: > In fact we do have someone who can offer an opinion. > Robert, speak up. I understand that you've been working > in Python at Google. That's relevant experience. Say > something. :-) What was the question again? We do have enforced code reviews and style guides. But they're not onerous. All of these things help to make our much codebase better than it would be without them. It helps bring changes out into the open (as most reviews are CC'ed to some group list or another) and I've never seen anyone have a problem with a review -- because they're always happening (and usually good natured) nobody seems to get bothered. This isn't just for Python. Same thing for Java, C++, and every other language we use. -R From Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com Mon Aug 28 13:10:12 2006 From: Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com (Todd Cranston-Cuebas) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:10:12 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] LA.pm Tech Talk-09-06-06-Luke Kanies - Why You Should Use Ruby Message-ID: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D40375E@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Time to stir things up at the LA.pm! Luke Kanies will present... Why You Should Use Ruby Plan to stay afterward to get a bite in a local restaurant. We have a special speaker this month! Luke Kanies stirred things up with a recent article (USENIX, April 2006) "Why You Should Use Ruby." With Luke's heavy experience in perl and recent work in Ruby, he's a great person to talk about what he sees as the strengths and weaknesses of both languages/platforms. Remember, this isn't a celebrity roast! It's an open discussion on our favorite language and a recent contender! Date / Time : Wednesday, September 6th, 2006; 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m Luke has a very tight schedule and he's been nice enough to squeeze us in during a trip to LA so please arrive on time if possible. Location: Ticketmaster's Movie Theater 8800 W. Sunset Blvd. West Hollywood, CA 90069 Practical information you should know.... Please arrive a few minutes early if you can. I realize that traffic can be difficult in LA but we're going to start as close to 7:00 p.m. as possible. Ticketmaster is located on the southeast corner of Sunset Blvd. and Palm Avenue. At night, it is hard to see the 8800 number on our red brick building so be careful you don't drive past. Parking is off of Palm Avenue. Please see the map link below for our location. When you arrive, please pull into our parking structure below our building unless you like getting parking tickets ;) http://www.google.com/maps?f=q &hl=en&q=8800+w.+sunset+blvd.+west+hollywood,+ca&ie=UTF8&om=1&ll=34.092934,- 118.380542&spn=0.025482,0.054245 RSVP Please Finally, if you plan to attend, please RSVP to the link below. It is very helpful for us to know how many people will arrive so we can make the necessary plans. http://www.evite.com/app/publicUrl/tcc at ticketmaster.com/techtalk-090606 If you have any other questions, you can contact me directly. Todd Cranston-Cuebas 310-360-2436 tcc at ticketmaster.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/losangeles-pm/attachments/20060828/a700d125/attachment.html From smawhoo at yahoo.com Tue Aug 29 12:50:54 2006 From: smawhoo at yahoo.com (Chris) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:50:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [LA.pm] LA.pm Tech Talk-09-06-06-Luke Kanies - Why You Should Use Ruby In-Reply-To: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D40375E@pasmail3.office.tmcs> Message-ID: <20060829195054.51199.qmail@web53209.mail.yahoo.com> I, probably like many of the members, can not participate the talk. But can some one please give a quick summary on, "why should we use Rudy, or learn Rudy"? Thanks. c --- Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote: > Time to stir things up at the LA.pm! > > Luke Kanies will present... > > Why You Should Use Ruby > Plan to stay afterward to get a bite in a local > restaurant. > > We have a special speaker this month! Luke Kanies > stirred things up with a > recent article (USENIX, April 2006) "Why You Should > Use Ruby." With Luke's > heavy experience in perl and recent work in Ruby, > he's a great person to > talk about what he sees as the strengths and > weaknesses of both > languages/platforms. Remember, this isn't a > celebrity roast! It's an open > discussion on our favorite language and a recent > contender! > > Date / Time : > Wednesday, September 6th, 2006; 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 > p.m > Luke has a very tight schedule > and he's been nice enough to squeeze us in during a > trip to LA so > please arrive on time if possible. > > Location: > Ticketmaster's Movie Theater > 8800 W. Sunset Blvd. > West Hollywood, CA 90069 > > Practical information you should know.... > > Please arrive a few minutes early if you can. I > realize that traffic can be > difficult in LA but we're going to start as close to > 7:00 p.m. as possible. > Ticketmaster is located on the southeast corner of > Sunset Blvd. and Palm > Avenue. At night, it is hard to see the 8800 number > on our red brick > building so be careful you don't drive past. Parking > is off of Palm Avenue. > Please see the map link below for our location. When > you arrive, please pull > into our parking structure below our building unless > you like getting > parking tickets ;) > > http://www.google.com/maps?f=q > +ca&ie=UTF8&om=1&ll=34.092934,-118.380542&spn=0.025482,0.054245> > &hl=en&q=8800+w.+sunset+blvd.+west+hollywood,+ca&ie=UTF8&om=1&ll=34.092934,- > 118.380542&spn=0.025482,0.054245 > > RSVP Please > > Finally, if you plan to attend, please RSVP to the > link below. It is very > helpful for us to know how many people will arrive > so we can make the > necessary plans. > > > > http://www.evite.com/app/publicUrl/tcc at ticketmaster.com/techtalk-090606 > > > If you have any other questions, you can contact me > directly. > > Todd Cranston-Cuebas > 310-360-2436 > tcc at ticketmaster.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Losangeles-pm mailing list > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com Tue Aug 29 13:03:51 2006 From: Todd.Cranston-Cuebas at Ticketmaster.com (Todd Cranston-Cuebas) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:03:51 -0700 Subject: [LA.pm] LA.pm Tech Talk-09-06-06-Luke Kanies - Why You Should Use Ruby Message-ID: <71D28C8451BFD5119B2B00508BE26E640D40378D@pasmail3.office.tmcs> I'll see if I can get hand-outs in a format that we can get up on the web. It would be good to get some of the arguments in favor of Ruby out there for review. It will also be interesting to see if some of these differences are addressed by Perl 6. Todd > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris [mailto:smawhoo at yahoo.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 12:51 PM > To: Todd Cranston-Cuebas; losangeles-pm at pm.org > Subject: Re: [LA.pm] LA.pm Tech Talk-09-06-06-Luke Kanies - > Why You Should Use Ruby > > I, probably like many of the members, can not participate the > talk. But can some one please give a quick summary on, > > "why should we use Rudy, or learn Rudy"? > > Thanks. > > c > > --- Todd Cranston-Cuebas > wrote: > > > Time to stir things up at the LA.pm! > > > > Luke Kanies will present... > > > > Why You Should Use Ruby > > Plan to stay afterward to get a bite in a local restaurant. > > > > We have a special speaker this month! Luke Kanies stirred things up > > with a recent article (USENIX, April 2006) "Why You Should > Use Ruby." > > With Luke's heavy experience in perl and recent work in > Ruby, he's a > > great person to talk about what he sees as the strengths and > > weaknesses of both languages/platforms. Remember, this isn't a > > celebrity roast! It's an open discussion on our favorite > language and > > a recent contender! > > > > Date / Time : > > Wednesday, September 6th, 2006; 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m Luke > has a very > > tight schedule and he's been nice enough to squeeze us in during a > > trip to LA so please arrive on time if possible. > > > > Location: > > Ticketmaster's Movie Theater > > 8800 W. Sunset Blvd. > > West Hollywood, CA 90069 > > > > Practical information you should know.... > > > > Please arrive a few minutes early if you can. I realize > that traffic > > can be difficult in LA but we're going to start as close to > 7:00 p.m. > > as possible. > > Ticketmaster is located on the southeast corner of Sunset Blvd. and > > Palm Avenue. At night, it is hard to see the 8800 number on our red > > brick building so be careful you don't drive past. Parking > is off of > > Palm Avenue. > > Please see the map link below for our location. When you arrive, > > please pull into our parking structure below our building > unless you > > like getting parking tickets ;) > > > > http://www.google.com/maps?f=q > > > > > +ca&ie=UTF8&om=1&ll=34.092934,-118.380542&spn=0.025482,0.054245> > > > &hl=en&q=8800+w.+sunset+blvd.+west+hollywood,+ca&ie=UTF8&om=1& > ll=34.092934,- > > 118.380542&spn=0.025482,0.054245 > > > > RSVP Please > > > > Finally, if you plan to attend, please RSVP to the link > below. It is > > very helpful for us to know how many people will arrive so > we can make > > the necessary plans. > > > > > > > alk-090606> > > > http://www.evite.com/app/publicUrl/tcc at ticketmaster.com/techta > lk-090606 > > > > > > If you have any other questions, you can contact me directly. > > > > Todd Cranston-Cuebas > > 310-360-2436 > > tcc at ticketmaster.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Losangeles-pm mailing list > > Losangeles-pm at pm.org > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/losangeles-pm > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection > around http://mail.yahoo.com >