[kw-pm] Perlski II

[Daniel R. Allen]

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, John Macdonald wrote:

> OK, the reference to unsigned char is, as you say, (a) lame,
> and (b) not applicable to Perl.  So, does the fact that you
> did not put a second identical footnote mean that writing
> snowbAUd instead of snowbOARd was a serendipidous accident?

Nope; it was merely a baud joke. [1]

[1] http://use.perl.org/~Matts/journal/28269



> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 12:31:51PM -0500, Eric Maki wrote:
> >
> > Perlski I was such a success, that we are doing it again.  Grab
> > or rent some skis or a snowbaud, and head for the hills next
> > Thursday (Feb 02).  Same meeting time, same meeting place. (7pm,
> > the skischoolshed)
> >
> > I will post this on the website today.  SOs encouraged... last
> > time this contained so little geek related talk that I think we
> > underflowed an unsigned char¹.
> >
> > Notes:
> >  - if you feel that key details are lacking, email me
> >  - if you are worried that your skiing skills aren't up to snuff,
> >    don't be.  We have a bunnyhill squad.
> >
> > Regards,
> > fishbot
> >
> > ¹yes, I know that joke is (a) lame, and (b) not applicable to Perl.
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > kw-pm mailing list
> > kw-pm at pm.org
> > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kw-pm
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> kw-pm mailing list
> kw-pm at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kw-pm
>