[KPUG] Oddities with VM setup

Griffin Kelton griffin.kelton at gmail.com
Mon Sep 17 00:10:34 PDT 2012


It sounds like you have something wrong with your VM setup. Corrupted
install? Preferences issue? I'm not sure what the trouble is. Sorry I
couldn't help.
On Sep 17, 2012 3:05 AM, "Jon" <halfbrown at gmail.com> wrote:

> Griffin,
>
> See the attached for what my Network options looks like. My Adapter(s) 2-4
> are grayed out and unclickable, so I can't add anything else.
>
> Jon
>
> From: Griffin Kelton <griffin.kelton at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Kitsap Perl Users Group <kpug-pm at pm.org>
> Date: Sunday, September 16, 2012 11:53 PM
> To: Kitsap Perl Users Group <kpug-pm at pm.org>
> Subject: Re: [KPUG] Oddities with VM setup
>
> Jon,
>
> You need to somehow enable eth1 to be your host-only adapter. Otherwise,
> like you said, the connection will by default timeout because 192.168.56.2
> won't be online. Just to clarify, this is what my disabled network adapters
> look like: http://cl.ly/image/3S3a170H1u3C. This is what they look like
> when enabled: http://cl.ly/image/1y1f0G3N2I3X. Are you saying that when
> they are disabled, you are unable to select the "Enable Network Adapter"
> check box?
>
> In regards to your ssh client, I used Terminal as well. =)
>
> Griffin Kelton
> (919)306.1135
> www.griffinkelton.com
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Jon <halfbrown at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Lady (Ladies?) & Gentlemen,
>>
>> I've run into an odd snag on the VM install for my lovely MacBook Pro, so
>> I thought I'd post to the group to see if anyone has any help because my
>> Google-Fu is sending me around in circles.
>>
>> I got all the way to Section E, "Establish a non-console/SSH connection
>> to the local host-only address" and finally hit said snag. I cracked open
>> SSH, typed in:
>>
>> ssh –p 22 –v jon at 192.168.56.2
>>
>> And received the following error:
>>
>> ssh: connect to host 192.168.56.2 port 22: Connection timed out
>>
>> This got me thinking. Dangerous, yes, but thinking nonetheless. :)
>>
>> During Section D, "Debian setup", I ran into a previous snag. Several
>> times I kept getting a problem wherein I would receive the error message:
>>
>> Failed to bring up eth1.
>>
>> Oddly enough the way I (accidentally) got around that was through a bug I
>> typed into /etc/network/interfaces detailing the auto eth1 and then face
>> eth2 (et c). Nothing alerted me to this until later on in the process when
>> I began debugging my "odd snag" I initially mentioned. Anyhoo…  I figured
>> something had to be right since I did all of the apt updates between
>> Section D and Section E, so obviously I had networking out to the
>> inter-tubes. Admittedly, while I'm pretty good with code, hardware has been
>> a mystery to me since circa 1996. And even then, not so much.
>>
>> So I've been mucking around Google trying to see what's up, heading to
>> virtualbox.org to do the same, and all that jazz. But I'm stumped and
>> was hoping someone could at least point me in the right direction.
>>
>> As such, I have a few ideas for where things could have gone wrong, and I
>> thought I'd share.
>>
>>    - When working on the VirtualBlox Manager, under Network, I only have
>>    one option, and that's for Adapter 1. I selected Bridged Adapter, the Name
>>    is en0: Wi-Fi (Airport), which was the default, and the only other options
>>    I have are for Promiscuous Mode (scandalous!), the Mac Address, and a
>>    checkbox for "Cable connected". Pretty sure I didn't touch any of those, so
>>    I'm feeling good about those. However, in the VM setup instructions under
>>    B.5.d.ii, I couldn't set a virtual adapter because I have no
>>    option/availability to do so. All of the non-used Adapters listed (2-4) are
>>    grayed out and cannot be selected. I presume that's by design via the
>>     VirtualBox software or my hardware, so I just skipped it.
>>    - Section D.3, that's where I'm guessing the real issue is. AFAICT I
>>    only have 1 Adapter (see my notes above RE: B.5.d.ii), and I keep getting a
>>    "hey you can't run 2 auto loads of eth0" error if I don't use eth1, so my
>>    thinking is/was I'd have a /etc/network/interfaces file that looks like
>>    this:
>>
>> auto lo
>> iface lo inet loopback
>>
>> auto eth0
>> allow-hotplug eth0
>> iface eth0 inet dhcp
>>
>> auto eth1
>> iface eth1 inet static
>> address 192.168.56.2
>> gateway 192.168.56.1
>> netmask 255.255.255.0
>> network 192.168.56.0
>> broadcast 192.168.56.255
>>
>> Yes, that's actually what's in my /etc/network/interfaces file right
>> now. It's that last section I'm really wondering about, and hoping that
>> someone can verify yes/no on if I did that correctly. Yes, I did the
>> restart, yes I tried the ifdown's, etc. Mostly I keep getting messages
>> saying it doesn't recognize eth1.
>>
>> I'm guessing that since I had apt/etc. working already, once I get past
>> this issue the rest will be a breeze. That's what I'm hoping for, at least.
>>
>> Oh! And one more thing… Section E starts off with "Establish a
>> non-console/SSH connection to the local host-only address". Well, the
>> console is my favorite SSH client. :) Is there some funky issue where if
>> I'm attempting to SSH (and assuming this whole time that I should be SSHing
>> via the VM CLI), that that is the problem? Or at least a problem?
>>
>> Jon
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/kpug-pm/attachments/20120917/9cc8b6a8/attachment.html>


More information about the KPUG-PM mailing list