[Kc] Apache Lucy 0.1.0 released

[Peter Karman]

Me wrote on 6/11/11 8:40 PM:
> I have looked at Lucene before.
> And it handles a lot of constructions of search morphology.
> But, of course, it requires a grounding in java to use.
> (I know there is solr, but you still need to maintain the software.)
> 

right. /me nods

> It looks like Lucy is maybe not quite as massive as Lucene, but easier to
> use in smaller productions (via apache instead of a servlet).
> They mention a quicker startup time than Lucene.
> Which seem to support this approach?

Lucy relies heavily on mmap().

> 
> Is lucy easy to install?
> (Which would make it nice for smaller projects.)

tias.

% cpan -i Lucy


-- 
Peter Karman  .  http://peknet.com/  .  peter at peknet.com