[Kc] DBIx::Class or Class::DBI

[Andrew Hanenkamp]

To quote the folks on #perl @ irc.freenode.net:

14:46:25 < zostay> can somebody summarize the diff between Classs::DBI and
DBIx::Class? i want to make sure i remember correctly before answer a PM
list message
14:49:28 < mst> zostay: DBIx::Class obsoletes Class::DBI
14:49:48 < cfedde> DBIx::Class works better.
14:50:03 < zostay> then my memory serves... :)
14:50:27 < mst> zostay: DBIx::Class also provides a full compatibility layer
for Class::DBI, which in 08100 is better tested than Class::DBI and being
maintained
                by Scgwern himself
14:51:35 < cfedde> s/cg/ch/

Cheers,
Sterling (aka zostay)

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Kit Peters <popefelix at gmail.com> wrote:

> I am personally enamoured with DBIC, and most of the Catalyst
> documentation that I'm seeing assumes DBIC.  If I had to choose, I'd
> go with DBIC right now.
>
> KP
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:35 PM,  <developer at peelle.org> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> >
> >     Thanks in advance for your responces. My boss is doing the whole
> standardize thing. Luckily I have pretty well sealed the deal for us keeping
> Perl, and even using Catalyst. But What I was curious about was Which is
> better? DBIx::Class or Class::DBI. I read each one's description on cpan.
> and couln't pick out a clear advantage between them.
> >
> >  Any advice would be a great help.
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >
> >  James Carman
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  kc mailing list
> >  kc at pm.org
> >  http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kc
> >
>
>
>
> --
> GPG public key fingerpint: 1A12 04B6 0C80 306A B292  14FD 2C7A 1037 F666
> 46A7
> _______________________________________________
> kc mailing list
> kc at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/kc/attachments/20080403/c618d2a3/attachment.html