[Kc] meeting Tuesday Oct 10 2006

[Matthew Wilson]

> I wish there was more documentation on the approach Cinematch takes 
> and the alternative approaches. The progress bounty might be had by 
> anyone who stumbles upon a better balance of approaches, but I doubt 
> anyone will manage the million dollar prize without a novel approach.

More on the method Cinematch might use...

http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=1&p=1&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&S1=20050125307&OS=20050125307&RS=20050125307
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 2852 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/kc/attachments/20061008/3fd5f975/attachment.bin