[JaxPM] && usage?

[j proctor]

On the jacksonville-pm-list; Jax.PM'er j proctor <jproctor at oit.umass.edu> wrote -



> OK, having thought some more about it, I feel that "&&" or "and" 
> are pretty close to if() in length -- so what we are really talking 
> about is "clarity" (like Steve said  :)

IIRC, we're *only* talking about clarity.  The interpreter actually uses
the same code for the conditional once it's parsed.  Of course, the
precedence is slightly different, but that doesn't seem to be an issue in
this case.


j


Jax.PM Moderator's Note:
This message was posted to the Jacksonville Perl Monger's Group listserv.
The group manager can be reached at -- owner-jacksonville-pm-list at pm.org
to whom send all praises, complaints, or comments...