<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On Sep 1, 2014, at 16:54, Mark Allen wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:lucida console, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13px; font-family: 'lucida console', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span><br></span></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13px; font-family: 'lucida console', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span>I am curious why you feel like "Moo" is drinking the kool-aid and rolled your own (Package::New)?</span></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Actually, I didn't roll it, it was the common part of module maker from at least 10 years ago. It was in an internal package until 2011 which is when I spilt it off about the same time as Moose was getting popular.</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:lucida console, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 13px; font-family: 'lucida console', sans-serif; background-color: transparent; font-style: normal;"><span>What about Moo do you find technically deficient?</span></div></div></blockquote><br><div>I'm not sure I've ever found something Moose did for me. If it had something that I needed I'd adopt it. Since I POD all of my code the pod is always more typing than the code So I don't see how "has" is any shorter than "sub".</div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Mike</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>mrdvt92</div><div><br></div></body></html>