[pm-h] July Houston.pm Meeting topic

[G. Wade Johnson]

Well, so far we still seem to be lacking opinions.

Let's try narrowing it down by looking at JD's top two, lightning talks
or social meeting.

I could probably come up with a 5-10 minute talk if we have enough
people to make it worthwhile. Any other takers?

If we don't have a solid idea before Tuesday, we'll need to fall back
to a social meeting.

Any other volunteers?

G. Wade

On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 13:40:42 -0500
John Lightsey via Houston <houston at pm.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 13:20 -0500, Robert Stone via Houston wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > Brainstorming some ideas:
> > 
> >    1. Perhaps this would be a good time for a YAPC (errr I mean
> > "The Perl Conference") wrap up?  I know how much Todd *loves*
> > talking about YAPC (double errr TPC)!
> >    2. Another round of picks/lightening talks could be
> > interesting!  I am confident a number of us could do 5-10 minute
> > talks about cool new toys we've found.
> >    3. We could always go Social this month.  It's been awhile since
> > we got together for that sort of meeting.
> >    4. If anyone has a game they are looking to automate, a round
> > table discussion on clever solutions to the problem would be
> > fascinating.  We could even further discuss WordBrain ( now on CPAN
> >    https://metacpan.org/release/Game-WordBrain ) but it may be
> > challenging to find more low hanging fruit.
> >    5. Hackathon - Several of us have modules on CPAN that need some
> > work, for those that do not currently have any CPAN modules we
> > could help them get a PAUSE account and release ACME::(pause
> > id)::MyFirstModule.  Idea shamelessly stolen from brian d foy.
> > 
> > Any opinions/favorites from the above list?  I vote for
> > picks/lightening talks but any of the above sound like great fun.
> > 
> 
> Most to least preferred, I'd put the options you've given in this
> order:
> 
> 2 3 1 5 4
> 
> I can definitely put together a lightning talk if we go that route.
> 
> You didn't mention your preference though.
> 


-- 
The function of good software is to make the complex appear to be
simple. -- Grady Booch